|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 25 2011 03:19 maahes wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2011 01:44 Torte de Lini wrote:On May 25 2011 00:36 Maliris wrote:On May 25 2011 00:34 Aeres wrote:On May 25 2011 00:27 TL.net Bot wrote: platorepublic was just banned by Plexa.
That account was created on 2011-04-14 10:18:14 and had 344 posts.
Reason: Basically you're a bad poster and we don't want you posting here anymore. Thank you, Plexa. It's about fucking time. This, a thousand times this. I never saw what he did wrong? His topic about good-looking guys is the only thing I can recall from him. I was with you on this and then I saw this post. Yeah, he can go, no big deal. ;o
His philosophical views were outdated anyway.. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" I mean, Plato??
|
For someone that "takes philosophy at Oxford", he didn't really know much about philosophy at all.
|
On May 25 2011 03:38 koreasilver wrote: For someone that "takes philosophy at Oxford", he didn't really know much about philosophy at all. He looked up the definition of philosophy in the Oxford dictionary.
|
On May 25 2011 03:42 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2011 03:38 koreasilver wrote: For someone that "takes philosophy at Oxford", he didn't really know much about philosophy at all. He looked up the definition of philosophy in the Oxford dictionary. LOL.
Cheers, plexa! <3
|
|
Plato....
PLATOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
PLATOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY! Why would you do this.....
I will miss you plato. I will miss your 5000 blogs that somehow all lacked content. I will miss your meaningful words. I will miss your innocent, almost childlike, disregard for the rules. I will miss the days I spent reading your blogs, feeling better about myself.
I will always remember you Plato. I will always remember the last thing you said to me, right before you left us.
On May 21 2011 05:35 platorepublic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2011 03:49 Pandain wrote:On May 21 2011 02:46 platorepublic wrote:On May 21 2011 00:43 TheGiz wrote: You do not have to know good to do good, and knowing good does not necessarily bring good either. A sociopath may know what 'good' is, but has no regard for doing good and it will not guide the sociopath's actions. Indifference is a form of sociopathy as well, and there are many people in the world who are simply indifferent.
That said, ethical people may still know good but may not always perform actions that fall into the realm of 'good,' because such actions may be guided by emotion, temptation, or necessity. Good is also inherently subjective, and as such individuals may claim to know what 'good' is despite having different ideas on the subject.
Knowing good does not help elevate oneself morally unless doing good also comes of it. How do you do good if you don't know what good is? If darkness is bad, why does it hide you? If light is good, why does it blind you? I never said darkness is bad/light is good.
Good bye, Plato....
May the angels carry your shining spirit and make it a star, for all to see the greatness that you embodied.
|
Good job Plexa, I knew it was only a matter of time before plato got nuked. Man that guy was odd...this blog that he made might as been the oddest I've seen in a while:
http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=220797#2
I've never seen such a defensive poster. I got banned from posting on his blogs by him because I posted "you like blogging a lot eh?"...harsh. Even Racenilatr wasn't as defensive as this guy...
|
Thank god, he is bad enough on B.net
|
United States11390 Posts
On May 24 2011 21:32 tofucake wrote: Both the top banlings play EVE in the same corp.
Coincidence?
or conspiracy? I don't play bad games.
|
On May 25 2011 04:04 Zapdos_Smithh wrote:Good job Plexa, I knew it was only a matter of time before plato got nuked. Man that guy was odd...this blog that he made might as been the oddest I've seen in a while: http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=220797#2I've never seen such a defensive poster. I got banned from posting on his blogs by him because I posted "you like blogging a lot eh?"...harsh. Even Racenilatr wasn't as defensive as this guy... I dunno dude, the Racenilatr rage fest blog seemed pretty defensive to me, glad that idiots gone though.
The posting quality on some of the people who came with SC2 is just appalling sometimes
|
On May 24 2011 02:37 travis wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2011 02:33 Kipsate wrote:I didn't follow exactly, but as far as I can see its simple, he means you post everywhere, which is evident of the amount of posts you do and rack up, then you say ''stretching the imagination'' wheras that is not exactly true as you do rack up posts pretty fast.(as Shockkey said) Nothing wrong with it imo, but that way you come off as defensive, hence the response. On May 24 2011 01:47 GHOSTCLAW wrote: tdl, you're nowhere near the most prolific poster (even historically) that tl has ever had. Out of curiosity, who was?. im gonna have to guess konadora
I usually have nothing to say, but if i know one thing, kona is on the top of that list LOL
I wish he would come back to us in the ADT. I miss having someone who could do 100+ posts a day. Also need the loli is not a crime brigade back imho
|
On May 25 2011 04:04 Zapdos_Smithh wrote:Good job Plexa, I knew it was only a matter of time before plato got nuked. Man that guy was odd...this blog that he made might as been the oddest I've seen in a while: http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=220797#2I've never seen such a defensive poster. I got banned from posting on his blogs by him because I posted "you like blogging a lot eh?"...harsh. Even Racenilatr wasn't as defensive as this guy... This was a long time in coming, I felt bad for the blog sections, it suffered so much abuse under him.
|
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
Lol yeah, that was pretty epic when it came out.
|
Incontrol banned.....?
Nevermind, on JP's stream he said it got overturned after messaging the mods. He was quite perplexed by the ban.
|
LOL iNcontrol:
iNcontroL was just temp banned for 2 days by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2004-07-18 10:24:14 and had 26168 posts.
Reason: Three warnings in under a month for flaming. Get incontrol of yourself when going for that reply button.
You know better.
On May 25 2011 14:11 iNcontroL wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2011 14:10 cheesemaster wrote:On May 25 2011 14:09 Liquid`Tyler wrote:On May 25 2011 14:07 DoomsVille wrote:On May 25 2011 14:04 cheesemaster wrote: I think that was pretty douchey of incontrol to clown on huk for his height after he challenged him to a PVP. How does huk challenging incontrol to a PVP have anything to do with his height, and why would it make it more threatening if huk was taller.
Seems like a pretty insecure comment from incontrol having to go for a low blow like that. It's pretty douchey of Huk to try to end a discussion about strategy with lets play 1v1 because I know I'm better than you. the point of playing games is to show how it works... not to win games that are irrelevant to the discussion and say "well i bested you in this situation, so i know better in this other situation as well" yes whattyler said ^ thanks tyler even though i said pretty much the same thing, people will just ignore me unfortunately =( as they should don't try and make drama.. we are all friends. you can shut the fuck up now User was temp banned for this post.
Although he was unbanned shortly afterwards...
|
Netherlands45349 Posts
Lol I like that Sherlock guy, it was an old account too.
Hmmm interesting.
|
That whole Sherlock thing happened a while before I got an account for TL thanks for throwing that link what a funny/crazy situation, reminds me of why I don't have an active Facebook. lol Did anyone ever find out who "Sherlock" really was?
|
Wow, that's one of the most hilarious chains of posts i've ever seen. Hahahahahaha! He shouldn't have been permanently banned for that though. Still, Funny shit
|
It was hilarious, and I guess it's fine since he happened to have found the right guy, but just imagine if Sherlock was wrong and he fingered some random guy by mistake. With the internet, you can literally ruin someone's life - a power that should not to be trifled with.
|
|
|
|