EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 3122
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8764 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10231 Posts
Oh, I guess the "anti-antifa" means he's fascist, right? Lol... | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On January 08 2021 03:13 Jealous wrote: What exactly was bannable about that post? Seems like he simply listed his beliefs and approached a question in a civil manner, I don't get it. Oh, I guess the "anti-antifa" means he's fascist, right? Lol... Libertarian, anarcho-capitalist ban spree. Note at top of thread should warn people about long posts or responding in the manner of which you’re addressed. Political beliefs at the fringes of the average posters belief are treated differently; just look at the post he got banned for. I’m way closer to his views on second amendment protections that probably any other person posting, save for maybe 1-2, and I know it’s forbidden to passionately argue for how and why they should be preserved. But whatever, it’s already a waste of breath. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On January 07 2021 18:19 BerserkSword wrote: By putting (the politicians not the electorate), it's clear what he wanted to express was that most democrats are the pinnacle of scourge in my eyes. Otherwise he would had simply written "democrat politicians". Most democrats (the politicians not the electorate) are the pinnacle of scourge in my eyes Other than that his post would had been fine in my eyes on a purely by the rules level. Context, when he wrote that an armed mob had been confirmed an hour ago to have broken into Capitol building. Somehow those guys aren't the pinnacle of scourge. He's insane of course but this posts gives an insight into the minds of that armed mob. Guns. Marxists, Socialism. Welfare. Nowhere on that list is support for democracy of course. Utter moral degeneracy and alt-reality to show. Pleasantly suprised to see zeo banned, even if it was only for 2 days. Nice to see bans towards those who continue to spew that the election was stolen. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7917 Posts
Nothing like xDaunt imo. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10231 Posts
I can understand that, but I'm still struggling to see how that post adds up to being a last straw type of deal. Maybe I am missing some sort of nuance because I'm pretty apolitical. Seems to just be a case of being punished for wrongthink. | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8640 Posts
On January 08 2021 05:39 Jealous wrote: I can understand that, but I'm still struggling to see how that post adds up to being a last straw type of deal. Maybe I am missing some sort of nuance because I'm pretty apolitical. Seems to just be a case of being punished for wrongthink. demonization of the political rival as a scourge - even if it is a heated political debate is not very subtle. the thread moved so fast I did not even catch that one lol. I mean he was out there in his views - very internet edgelord without a lot of substance behind it, but kinda inconsequential banned or not. mods did what they thought was right. law and order and house rules bitches. what else is there to say? | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8640 Posts
On January 08 2021 07:16 Dangermousecatdog wrote: How about you don't say "law and order and house rules bitches" for what else. Why so vulgar? in these trying times a little humor can make a welcoming difference. and it is house rules and mods literally doing _law and order_ by enforcing them. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8640 Posts
On January 08 2021 07:48 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Why the "bitches"? You are going to have to forgive me for not seeing that as welcome humour. you are forgiven. | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland26028 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10231 Posts
On January 08 2021 07:06 Doublemint wrote: demonization of the political rival as a scourge - even if it is a heated political debate is not very subtle. the thread moved so fast I did not even catch that one lol. I mean he was out there in his views - very internet edgelord without a lot of substance behind it, but kinda inconsequential banned or not. mods did what they thought was right. law and order and house rules bitches. what else is there to say? Good point, I guess I never put much weight on the word "scourge" since it seemed metaphorical and thus more like hyperbole than anything. I got the message and didn't think it came off as overly offensive, but I guess words can hit harder depending on who you are. On January 08 2021 07:48 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Why the "bitches"? You are going to have to forgive me for not seeing that as welcome humour. C'mon bro chiil | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12320 Posts
On January 08 2021 03:48 Danglars wrote: Libertarian, anarcho-capitalist ban spree. Note at top of thread should warn people about long posts or responding in the manner of which you’re addressed. Political beliefs at the fringes of the average posters belief are treated differently; just look at the post he got banned for. I’m way closer to his views on second amendment protections that probably any other person posting, save for maybe 1-2, and I know it’s forbidden to passionately argue for how and why they should be preserved. But whatever, it’s already a waste of breath. If you're not posting cringe the moderation is going to be fine with fringe views, I've seen that when I was in there. You've always been full of shit in terms of that accusation. I will give you that a centrist gets away with posting a ton more cringe than the "fringes", but there's no moderator stopping anyone from posting their opinions. The closest we had to that was when the ghoul on your side whose name I forgot threatened to ban anyone defending antifa, and that got him removed. An issue for the far right is of course that events like those of yesterday are utterly indefensible, so it's difficult to have civil conversations about them. But hey, it's not like you were forced to be far right, that's a choice you made, so I'm not overly concerned that you're living with it now. | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8764 Posts
| ||
|
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
I think I agreed with BerserkSword just a couple of times on the state of Protoss but he wasn't one of the most obnoxious as far as Sc2 topics go. I am not shocked to see that his beliefs are so far from mine in general, I thought his account was much older tho. I might kind of miss him in the long run. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On January 08 2021 12:02 Nebuchad wrote: If you're not posting cringe the moderation is going to be fine with fringe views ... I will give you that a centrist gets away with posting a ton more cringe than the "fringes" That seems like little more than a roundabout way of saying "you get a lot more leeway to post marginally/badly as long as you have the right opinions." | ||
| ||
