|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On June 30 2020 21:11 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2020 18:35 Penev wrote:On June 30 2020 18:23 Acrofales wrote:On June 30 2020 17:13 Penev wrote:rekoJ was just banned by Seeker.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 00:20:42 and had 106 posts.
Reason: Be gone, troll! I feel like I'm missing something here. Can anyone eloborate on this insta? The post he was banned for was him being a right cunt and flaming someone who was actually contributing to the conversation. Why is it a straight perm, and not a warning or a temp ban? I'm guessing it's a PBU or his mod history is otherwise filled with trash? I'm guessing that too but I'd like to know for sure. If it's a PBU it probably should be mentioned as a reason. I don't mind mods having fun filling in ban reasons when it's clear what's going on but in this case it isn't. To me, at least. I looked at some of his most recent posts and he certainly doesn't hold back much but none of these were moderated. The way you're phrasing this makes you out to be massively entitled lol. Why do you need to be personally informed and kept appraised of moderator decisions? Is this a self-appointed position of oversight, or did someone secretly appoint you as an auditor of ban reasoning? Show nested quote +On June 30 2020 20:59 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I'm more disturbed by the repeated calls to close the sexual harassment thread from people who ostensibly want an outlet to discuss sexual harassment. Instead of banning the thread, they should be banned instead. Absolutely this. "Someone made a shitty post, show's over, clearly no one needs to talk about harassment anymore."
I probably shouldn't bother replying to someone who uses "lol" not jokingly but I'll humor you.
I'm just asking. I'm curious to why this dude got permed seemingly out of nowhere while I see others getting treated with way more lenience. Also I guess it's only called entitled if it's not you who's asking for clarification.
|
On June 30 2020 21:33 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2020 21:11 Jealous wrote:On June 30 2020 18:35 Penev wrote:On June 30 2020 18:23 Acrofales wrote:On June 30 2020 17:13 Penev wrote:rekoJ was just banned by Seeker.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 00:20:42 and had 106 posts.
Reason: Be gone, troll! I feel like I'm missing something here. Can anyone eloborate on this insta? The post he was banned for was him being a right cunt and flaming someone who was actually contributing to the conversation. Why is it a straight perm, and not a warning or a temp ban? I'm guessing it's a PBU or his mod history is otherwise filled with trash? I'm guessing that too but I'd like to know for sure. If it's a PBU it probably should be mentioned as a reason. I don't mind mods having fun filling in ban reasons when it's clear what's going on but in this case it isn't. To me, at least. I looked at some of his most recent posts and he certainly doesn't hold back much but none of these were moderated. The way you're phrasing this makes you out to be massively entitled lol. Why do you need to be personally informed and kept appraised of moderator decisions? Is this a self-appointed position of oversight, or did someone secretly appoint you as an auditor of ban reasoning? On June 30 2020 20:59 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I'm more disturbed by the repeated calls to close the sexual harassment thread from people who ostensibly want an outlet to discuss sexual harassment. Instead of banning the thread, they should be banned instead. Absolutely this. "Someone made a shitty post, show's over, clearly no one needs to talk about harassment anymore." I probably shouldn't bother replying to someone who uses "lol" not jokingly but I'll humor you.
... LOL
|
There's nothing entitled about asking for a more specific ban reason.
|
On June 30 2020 21:34 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2020 21:33 Penev wrote:On June 30 2020 21:11 Jealous wrote:On June 30 2020 18:35 Penev wrote:On June 30 2020 18:23 Acrofales wrote:On June 30 2020 17:13 Penev wrote:rekoJ was just banned by Seeker.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 00:20:42 and had 106 posts.
Reason: Be gone, troll! I feel like I'm missing something here. Can anyone eloborate on this insta? The post he was banned for was him being a right cunt and flaming someone who was actually contributing to the conversation. Why is it a straight perm, and not a warning or a temp ban? I'm guessing it's a PBU or his mod history is otherwise filled with trash? I'm guessing that too but I'd like to know for sure. If it's a PBU it probably should be mentioned as a reason. I don't mind mods having fun filling in ban reasons when it's clear what's going on but in this case it isn't. To me, at least. I looked at some of his most recent posts and he certainly doesn't hold back much but none of these were moderated. The way you're phrasing this makes you out to be massively entitled lol. Why do you need to be personally informed and kept appraised of moderator decisions? Is this a self-appointed position of oversight, or did someone secretly appoint you as an auditor of ban reasoning? On June 30 2020 20:59 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I'm more disturbed by the repeated calls to close the sexual harassment thread from people who ostensibly want an outlet to discuss sexual harassment. Instead of banning the thread, they should be banned instead. Absolutely this. "Someone made a shitty post, show's over, clearly no one needs to talk about harassment anymore." I probably shouldn't bother replying to someone who uses "lol" not jokingly but I'll humor you. ... LOL
roflmao
|
MarianoSC2 was just temp banned for 17 days by tofucake.
That account was created on 2015-06-04 16:48:11 and had 1154 posts.
Reason: Your poor posting adds nothing to conversations you take part in. When you come back, post better, or you won't be coming back.
17 days is a nice round number.
|
On July 02 2020 13:46 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +MarianoSC2 was just temp banned for 17 days by tofucake.
That account was created on 2015-06-04 16:48:11 and had 1154 posts.
Reason: Your poor posting adds nothing to conversations you take part in. When you come back, post better, or you won't be coming back. 17 days is a nice round number.
1 day 2 day and 2 weeks?
|
On July 02 2020 13:46 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +MarianoSC2 was just temp banned for 17 days by tofucake.
That account was created on 2015-06-04 16:48:11 and had 1154 posts.
Reason: Your poor posting adds nothing to conversations you take part in. When you come back, post better, or you won't be coming back. 17 days is a nice round number.
Are we banning people for primes now?
|
On July 02 2020 15:16 Solar424 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2020 13:46 ZigguratOfUr wrote:MarianoSC2 was just temp banned for 17 days by tofucake.
That account was created on 2015-06-04 16:48:11 and had 1154 posts.
Reason: Your poor posting adds nothing to conversations you take part in. When you come back, post better, or you won't be coming back. 17 days is a nice round number. Are we banning people for primes now?
It's the only way to prove that we are sentient.
|
On July 02 2020 15:56 Simberto wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2020 15:16 Solar424 wrote:On July 02 2020 13:46 ZigguratOfUr wrote:MarianoSC2 was just temp banned for 17 days by tofucake.
That account was created on 2015-06-04 16:48:11 and had 1154 posts.
Reason: Your poor posting adds nothing to conversations you take part in. When you come back, post better, or you won't be coming back. 17 days is a nice round number. Are we banning people for primes now? It's the only way to prove that we are sentient.
In that case we need more 11 and 13 day bans. I think we have 2, 3, 5 and 7 under control, but we kinda skipped over 11 and 13 to go straight to 17, right?
|
So, are we banning people for word salads now? Or is it just in the harrassment thread? Because I want to know if I should be reporting unintelligible combinations of words.
|
On July 03 2020 21:08 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
So, are we banning people for word salads now? Or is it just in the harrassment thread? Because I want to know if I should be reporting unintelligible combinations of words.
I read that word salad as minimizing at best and promoting apologist ideologies at worst. Given the topic at hand and the fact that user already had a history in that thread (and elsewhere, if we're to be honest) of questionable conduct, I think the ban was warranted.
|
On July 02 2020 16:39 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2020 15:56 Simberto wrote:On July 02 2020 15:16 Solar424 wrote:On July 02 2020 13:46 ZigguratOfUr wrote:MarianoSC2 was just temp banned for 17 days by tofucake.
That account was created on 2015-06-04 16:48:11 and had 1154 posts.
Reason: Your poor posting adds nothing to conversations you take part in. When you come back, post better, or you won't be coming back. 17 days is a nice round number. Are we banning people for primes now? It's the only way to prove that we are sentient. In that case we need more 11 and 13 day bans. I think we have 2, 3, 5 and 7 under control, but we kinda skipped over 11 and 13 to go straight to 17, right?
You need to watch out for the 14 day bans of people with 14 posts.
|
generationzyklon was just banned by Firebolt145.
That account was created on 2019-12-27 01:38:12 and had 9 posts.
Reason: Ew
Between the name and the manual mod edits, I am ever so slightly curious what this guy's story was.
|
Lalalaland34495 Posts
Not to mention the thread I hid permanently.
|
On July 04 2020 01:07 Firebolt145 wrote:
Not to mention the thread I hid permanently.
Not nuked. Hidden. The plot thickens!
|
14 day bans exist, nazi mods confirmed
In front of our faces this whole time
|
Lalalaland34495 Posts
I didn't just nuke because he had a few previous posts (like 3 or 4) which weren't troll posts. I hid because we couldn't leave that thread on public display. Suffice to say I had to google and learn a few new derogatory terms I hadn't come across before.
|
|
|
On July 04 2020 02:07 Firebolt145 wrote:
I didn't just nuke because he had a few previous posts (like 3 or 4) which weren't troll posts.
They were boring, cheerful posts tho which ain't worth.
Sounds like his spicier posts honor the username with which they were named. "Good" stuff.
|
On July 04 2020 02:10 JimmiC wrote:Well at least you learned something new, a silver lining! Show nested quote +On July 04 2020 02:07 Danglars wrote:
14 day bans exist, nazi mods confirmed
In front of our faces this whole time Too slow Inge did the same joke 4 posts earlier, and better IMO.
I read and echoed him 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
