|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
|
|
|
|
Gheizen64 was just temp banned for 1 week by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2010-06-15 21:09:02 and had 1172 posts.
Reason: Come back when you learn how to post without saying stupid shit like "butthurt" constantly.
On May 11 2015 00:50 Gheizen64 wrote:
He was both frequently played and had one of the top Win rates of the game. Continue ur butthurtness.
User was temp banned for this post.
On May 10 2015 21:07 Gheizen64 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 20:50 Dracolich70 wrote:
Played Undying regularly for over a year, probably still good, but it was quick he was nerfed, after rarely used by any before patch.
Don't know if it is just me, but Valve seems lost, and I doubt IceFrog is part of anything anymore. 57% wr 6.83 in pubs rarely used? Plz less butthurt.
|
On May 11 2015 06:00 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2015 05:26 boxerfred wrote:On May 11 2015 01:46 The_Templar wrote:
Bo5 is a nice change. Not every final has to be Bo7. What It's part of my theory that every game in a Bo5 is more valuable and the quality is therefore higher.
Which is why the best finals of SC2 were in Bo5 format, right
|
On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 11 2015 06:00 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2015 05:26 boxerfred wrote:On May 11 2015 01:46 The_Templar wrote:
Bo5 is a nice change. Not every final has to be Bo7. What It's part of my theory that every game in a Bo5 is more valuable and the quality is therefore higher.
you have some terrible theories
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post.
Do dumb of people possess the ability of self-reflection necessary to determine whether they are indeed dumb or not?
|
On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post.
Well Jonny got what he wanted. He's been trolling for a while now and finally got someone. Hopefully that satiates him and he can stop.
|
On May 12 2015 02:35 Zealously wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post. Do dumb of people possess the ability of self-reflection necessary to determine whether they are indeed dumb or not?
I don't know. I just know its not a valid debate strategy to call someone dumb.
|
I feel like Bo5's are alot more "anything can happen" compared with a Bo7, even if one player is down 1-2 or 0-2 winning a map then getting the momentum back is very possible and you generally see more pocket strategies in a Bo5 compared with a Bo7. But Bo7's are alot fairer to players with different skill sets. I can understand why someone would prefer a Bo5 from a spectator's point of view though.
|
On May 12 2015 06:36 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 02:35 Zealously wrote:On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post. Do dumb of people possess the ability of self-reflection necessary to determine whether they are indeed dumb or not? I don't know. I just know its not a valid debate strategy to call someone dumb.
What about calling someone a dootie head? Is that a valid debate strategy?
|
On May 12 2015 06:54 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 06:36 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 12 2015 02:35 Zealously wrote:On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post. Do dumb of people possess the ability of self-reflection necessary to determine whether they are indeed dumb or not? I don't know. I just know its not a valid debate strategy to call someone dumb. What about calling someone a dootie head? Is that a valid debate strategy?
Just call someone a fascist or an anarchist, works in any debate.
|
Jonny's use of "shitlord" brought me back to childhood playgrounds.
|
On May 12 2015 06:54 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 06:36 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 12 2015 02:35 Zealously wrote:On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post. Do dumb of people possess the ability of self-reflection necessary to determine whether they are indeed dumb or not? I don't know. I just know its not a valid debate strategy to call someone dumb. What about calling someone a dootie head? Is that a valid debate strategy?
And here I was thinking it was spelled doodie head.
|
On May 12 2015 07:01 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 06:54 ThomasjServo wrote:On May 12 2015 06:36 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 12 2015 02:35 Zealously wrote:On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post. Do dumb of people possess the ability of self-reflection necessary to determine whether they are indeed dumb or not? I don't know. I just know its not a valid debate strategy to call someone dumb. What about calling someone a dootie head? Is that a valid debate strategy? And here I was thinking it was spelled doodie head.
I went with the more firm, phonetic sound. I feel like Merriam Webster is still out on this one.
|
On May 12 2015 06:36 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2015 02:35 Zealously wrote:On May 12 2015 01:25 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 11 2015 18:35 WhiteDog wrote:On May 11 2015 18:34 puerk wrote:
Jonny so fail, didn't even write the books of Marx....
sorry but WhiteDog, you make a pretty agitated appearance, maybe you should consider slowing down your posting, to have a chance to read it again before deciding that you really want to post that Are you dumb ? This is a serious question. I really think that a normal - non stupid - person would have understood that I wrote the wrong word. User was temp banned for this post. Do dumb of people possess the ability of self-reflection necessary to determine whether they are indeed dumb or not? I don't know. I just know its not a valid debate strategy to call someone dumb.
Works quite well for some people, unfortunately, think Geert Wilders and his opponents.
|
On May 13 2015 15:34 playa wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2015 15:13 GGzerG wrote:On May 13 2015 15:04 playa wrote:On May 13 2015 14:44 GGzerG wrote:On May 13 2015 14:39 playa wrote:On May 13 2015 14:31 GGzerG wrote:On May 13 2015 14:14 playa wrote:On May 13 2015 13:45 GGzerG wrote:
This game was played almost 2 years ago... Yeah, and he still hacks. After at least two years of hacking, you're going to be a little better at disguising it. Yeah, it's obvious to me since I'm a GM Toss, but what are you going to deduce? Nothing, because you have fruit on your team who is blatantly hacking like this guy was two years ago. I see, so you have no replay still? You dying to have your whole team reported? I'm not sure why you are being childish / badmanner buddy, You post in GM / Master maphacking thread stating a player from my clan maphacks, I come and state I am the leader of the clan this player is in and asked for you to please provide replays to prove your accusation rather than this dead end statement and a replay from 2 years ago. I am not sure what we could consider what is happening now, you being upset, BM, and going against the rules of this the thread because you have no replays? EDIT : Grammar Stop playing stupid. Everyone already knows your team hacks. Watch any stream. Watch Kamkers last few vods and his games vs Fruit. I'm sure you're completely unaware that these players are hacking when all of GM already knows. This isn't team EG. This is a random team with a 70-80 apm player in GM who was CLEARLY hacking in the replay I showed. Let's all pay our respects to [Ever]water for becoming the best player ever for sub 85 APM. What's the secret! Just since I get the feel you must be previously associated with team Ascension, here is the replay. Feel free to humor me like they do. http://drop.sc/398852So, in this game the guy has an oracle in the corner of the map. He knows I have three stalkers in my mineral line, but since he knows I have a phoenix coming to kill it, when he shouldn't know, he decides to go ahead and try to kill as many probes as possible. What seals the deal on this being the move of someone hacking is he had stalkers about to attack my natural/front in a short matter of time, yet he didn't want to wait for that. Anyone knows that's ridiculous and you always try to draw units away from the mineral line before using an oracle. Then, later on he way points his zealots + mothership core to kill my reinforcing pylon and then sends the units right next to my pylon I had blocking his third. He had no reason to suspect something to be blocking his third. Only a noobie would waypoint to the middle of a base in P vs P and not have any other way points... If there is a pylon, 99% of the time it's going to be at the corner of a base, and you'd kill any unit that was attempting to block a nexus, that way, anyways. The guy is a noobie who is cheating. This [Ever]Fruit guy is far more brazen/bold. He's trying to go nerfy level, thus no one should take this guy seriously or his team. But ofc a clear cheater should get benefit of doubt. Water was acting oblivious to having hacked before, too. Where can I contact him to try to explain that he is hacking? Give me a break. I forgot to mention when he was waypointing his mothership core, it was phoenix vs phoenix at that point. It's generally pretty smart to have your mothership core roaming around when you have "0 idea" where the other person's phoenixes are. Lol, I love your attitude. My clan has strict policy, anyone who is caught hacking is insta banned, Kaitlyn helped catch a hacker on her stream, ophidian (her stream mod) notified me, and he aka KuDYa was immediatly removed. Me and Ever have no affiliation with Team Ascension, that is a pretty ridiculous claim as well. It is pretty sad you are saying " no one should take this team seriously", please take your little personal vendettas elsewhere. There are many good notable players in Ever, it is always possible for cheaters to slip into any team, the important part is making sure they are handled properly and in a timely manner, I will review this replay, and I would appreciate any replays on Fruit as well, as there has been other claims of this as well. There must be evidence. Evidence on Fruit? Lol. How many times does that guy get reported to you. 10 times per day minimum? It's not even worth the time. User was temp banned for this post.
playa was just temp banned for 1 week by JBright.
That account was created on 2010-12-28 11:18:46 and had 1149 posts.
Reason: It's also not worth our time reading your post without some kind of evidence/proof.
|
He doesn't seem very beach like
|
You should've just linked the whole page, it's a hilarious read.
|
On May 14 2015 03:39 Cokefreak wrote:
You should've just linked the whole page, it's a hilarious read.
We should change the name of the thread to the, "GM / Master map hacker, general hacking, cheating and dick measuring thread"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
