|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On February 05 2015 02:41 opisska wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 02:34 SKC wrote: Mühsam ernährt sich das Eichhörnchen Google translate With difficulty the squirrel.
Ok. The sentence is about a squirrel that has a hard time feeding itself. Doesn't really make much sense anyway.
This sentence makes perfect sense, if you would know German instead of relying on google translate.
It is a really common phrase along the lines of "step by step we advance" or "slow but steady"
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
SackOfWetMice finally bites the dust
|
On February 05 2015 23:34 GumBa wrote: SackOfWetMice finally bites the dust It became a SackOfDeadMice
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
It must be the general lack of good bans but you guys really make a 2 day ban look like a perm.
|
Even we can only comment on Adbots for so long. Things will pick up with LOTV before falling off completely again ;p By then shellbot will have 1 mil posts.
|
We really do lack some good bans for a while.
Imagine we didn't have Shamas...
|
KelsierSC was just temp banned for 2 days by Firebolt145.
That account was created on 2013-03-26 12:36:11 and had 5211 posts.
Reason: On February 05 2015 21:19 KelsierSC wrote: are you solo queing heroes?
I like the game but don't really enjoy playing with myself
huehuehue
no but seriously I masturbate
wat
Kelsier at least gave us a good one.
|
are dota, LoL, poker, and hearthstone members just more mature, is it lax moderation, or is it just that the sites are much smaller than tl.net? i expected so much more bans from those sites once everything was combined.
|
Based on average viewers (during NA daytime hours lol), TL is 3-4x the size of LD and LH, and 10X+ the size of LL so there's that. I'm not aware that poker bans make it to the ABL.
+ Show Spoiler [some personal speculation etc] +The sister sites also have somewhat different rules. Balance whine, for example, is simply less of a concern when 1/3 of the player base isn't deeply invested in each race and won't react emotionally instead of logically when words like "patchzerg" insinuate that they only win because of balance rather than skill. Complaining that Juggernaut or Teemo or Hunter is way overpowered and a 2 year old could win with them and needs nerfing right now is maybe not ideal but it doesn't incite nearly so much emotional backlash compared to complaining that protoss is so OP and a 2 year old can execute blink allins blah blah blah. One actually offends 1/3 of the readers, the other at worst bothers a small portion of the fanbase, most of whom actually agree and play that hero/champ/class because they think it's OP and if it wasn't OP they wouldn't play it. Which means that hard and fast balance whine rules are less necessary so balance whine bans are reserved for more egregious cases.
There's also some stuff like burden of proof that is variable between the games. In SC2 or BW, I can factually prove that a build order can finish X unit or building at Y time which is fast enough to stop Z rush. Etc. Its demonstrable and fact. So people who walk in and say "you can never go hatch first ZvP because you can't ever hold a cannon rush" get corrected, and if they persist then mod action could occur. It's a bit different in a game like dota where a discussion on which Trilane in a 3v3 scenario *should* win is very very ambiguous and based on way too many factors to be easily solvable. So if somebody argues for something, even if they suck at the game and have no clue what they are talking about you can't outright prove them wrong. It's a bad example but the idea kinda gets across. You could liken it to a math discussion forum where you get banned for saying 1+1=3 over and over versus a music discussion forum where, no matter how wrong you may be, we likely won't ban you for preferring nickelback over coldplay. Thats a better analogy.
Just some of my thoughts.
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
Yeah been low amount of good bans recently I agree. But thah wet mice ban even if only temp felt good xD such a shit poster (and this is coming from a massive shit poster)
|
On February 05 2015 21:32 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 02:41 opisska wrote:On February 05 2015 02:34 SKC wrote: Mühsam ernährt sich das Eichhörnchen Google translate With difficulty the squirrel.
Ok. The sentence is about a squirrel that has a hard time feeding itself. Doesn't really make much sense anyway. This sentence makes perfect sense, if you would know German instead of relying on google translate. It is a really common phrase along the lines of "step by step we advance" or "slow but steady"
I do actually know some German - honestly, from this sentence, I knew no words (apart from "sich" and "das" obviously) as the question of feeding squirells has never turned up neither in my German classes nor in any of my stays in Germany (and muhsam just seems to be an unusual word) but I looked them individually in a dictionary. That way, my understanding of the sentence is formally correct, but it doesn't make any sense nonetheless, because it just informs me of a completely surrealistic fact. You can't really assume that idioms are sensible to anyone who is not a native speaker. We could probably entertain each other for hours by presenting our idioms literally translated into English
|
ctstalker ending our dearth of bans by knocking out a big hitter.
Dodgin was just temp banned for 1 week by CTStalker.
That account was created on 2011-07-04 20:52:57 and had 37992 posts.
Reason: You have so many warnings, all for the same general stuff: don't post crappy one liners, don't post image macros. And yet you keep doing it. Please stop.
On February 06 2015 05:19 Dodgin wrote: User was temp banned for this post.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On February 06 2015 06:53 dAPhREAk wrote:ctstalker ending our dearth of bans by knocking out a big hitter. Show nested quote +Dodgin was just temp banned for 1 week by CTStalker.
That account was created on 2011-07-04 20:52:57 and had 37992 posts.
Reason: You have so many warnings, all for the same general stuff: don't post crappy one liners, don't post image macros. And yet you keep doing it. Please stop. Show nested quote +On February 06 2015 05:19 Dodgin wrote:On February 06 2015 03:39 dsousa wrote: Like it never happened.
2/5/2015
GG. User was temp banned for this post. That's pretty crazy. Never would have expected Dodgin to get banned.
|
|
Germany25649 Posts
On February 06 2015 08:23 SatedSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2015 08:13 Seeker wrote:On February 06 2015 06:53 dAPhREAk wrote:ctstalker ending our dearth of bans by knocking out a big hitter. Dodgin was just temp banned for 1 week by CTStalker.
That account was created on 2011-07-04 20:52:57 and had 37992 posts.
Reason: You have so many warnings, all for the same general stuff: don't post crappy one liners, don't post image macros. And yet you keep doing it. Please stop. On February 06 2015 05:19 Dodgin wrote:On February 06 2015 03:39 dsousa wrote: Like it never happened.
2/5/2015
GG. User was temp banned for this post. That's pretty crazy. Never would have expected Dodgin to get banned. Me neither, because the favouritism is strong around here.
So salty
|
your Country52797 Posts
Is that the most posts a user has ever been banned with? (It makes his ban reason slightly funnier.)
|
|
wow, first day9 and tasteless' mom, and now KBB's dad. this truly is a family website.
|
|
Germany25649 Posts
On February 06 2015 08:31 SatedSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2015 08:25 KadaverBB wrote:On February 06 2015 08:23 SatedSC2 wrote:On February 06 2015 08:13 Seeker wrote:On February 06 2015 06:53 dAPhREAk wrote:ctstalker ending our dearth of bans by knocking out a big hitter. Dodgin was just temp banned for 1 week by CTStalker.
That account was created on 2011-07-04 20:52:57 and had 37992 posts.
Reason: You have so many warnings, all for the same general stuff: don't post crappy one liners, don't post image macros. And yet you keep doing it. Please stop. On February 06 2015 05:19 Dodgin wrote:On February 06 2015 03:39 dsousa wrote: Like it never happened.
2/5/2015
GG. User was temp banned for this post. That's pretty crazy. Never would have expected Dodgin to get banned. Me neither, because the favouritism is strong around here. So salty data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" Just dropping dem truth bombs, son.
Feel free to voice your concerns in Website Feedback or drop me a PM. Moderation is supposed to be as fair and objective as possible and we always value constructive Feedback. Bring it!
|
|
|
|