|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On June 12 2013 06:35 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
But why? :/
I dunno. I was reading his last few posts and he sounded sad, but thats all I could see.
|
On June 12 2013 06:28 Aerisky wrote:What?! Nooooo  he was a khan fan too
Who what? Why?
|
bgx was just banned by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2010-08-23 12:35:39 and had 6587 posts.
Reason: By request.
WHY?
|
On June 12 2013 11:14 AmorphousPhoenix wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2013 11:10 xwoGworwaTsx wrote:
Science is not pure. There are good uses and bad uses for science. More specifically, there are uses for science in the name of patriotism. So no, science is not all that it is hyped up to be. Here is some common sense. The atomic bomb was not progress, but nuclear energy was. Science is neither good, nor bad. Human action makes it so. Science has nothing to say on what is good or bad. Human judgment makes it so. Show nested quote +On June 12 2013 11:14 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
I don't know what it is, but there's something about Scientism that makes it so much more obnoxious than the other mainstream religions. The smugness is greater. At least some religious people have learned the value in humility.
This guy is practically everywhere! And with every post, he is getting more and more aggressive. hmm smells like a pbu..
|
I actually rewrote my posts three times to tone down the aggression. You should have read my original response to that thread, it was much more satisfying, to be sure. I'm not a pbu though.
|
On June 12 2013 11:58 AmorphousPhoenix wrote:
I actually rewrote my posts three times to tone down the aggression. You should have read my original response to that thread, it was much more satisfying, to be sure. I'm not a pbu though.
Those must have been aggressive O.o, those posts weren't terribly aggressive, but still had that smell of "I kinda hate what you just wrote, you fuck" in them. On the bright side, I'm glad you showed self-control. On the subject of smelling like PBU's, normally PBU's have the same writing style each time, they rarely vary it up, I don't recognize his at all.
|
Canada11372 Posts
How about we stick to actual bans rather than speculate why people you are debating with ought to be banned...
|
Baltimore, USA22258 Posts
On June 11 2013 15:55 Myrddraal wrote:Wow his posting in that thread pissed me off a fair bit, especially the one with the ban notice, but I wasn't expecting a perm to come out of that. Can't really say I'm disappointed though. Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 00:30 SamsungStar wrote:
Your analysis is terrible and it's obvious to me why you're a paralegal. Also, one law firm is not all law firms. And no, I don't play well with terrible players. It's a trait many good players share.
User was banned for this post.
To be clear, this ban wasn't JUST because of that post. More like, it's been a long time coming and that just happened to be the post I had selected when I pulled the trigger.
|
On June 12 2013 12:06 hellokitty[hk] wrote:Yay! Is there any official comment regarding how much everyone hates SNM? Is it a problem that people are bashing SNM 80% of the time on chat? Poll: Who's problem is it?The haters, they're hating too hard (19) 70% SNM, he's unbelievably bad (6) 22% There is no problem (1) 4% I HATE SNM (!!!!) (1) 4% 27 total votes Your vote: Who's problem is it? (Vote): SNM, he's unbelievably bad
(Vote): The haters, they're hating too hard
(Vote): There is no problem
(Vote): I HATE SNM (!!!!)
User was temp banned for this post.
Also good riddance (for now).
Seriously, what an asshole... I also like how his poll backfired.
And ye, agreed on the idea that that post alone wasn't the only reason for storkhwaiting's re-ban.
|
|
|
On June 12 2013 14:59 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2013 03:54 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On June 12 2013 03:38 MaxField wrote:skaffaNL was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB. That account was created on 2010-11-10 21:27:57 and had 30 posts. Reason: No balance whining please. Yeah let's fcking nerfhammer Terran like it's always been
At the same time we got imba swarmhost, ridicilously easy to execute oracles and ultralists with queens support that never die.
but fck that, lets nerf terran.
we got shit units in hots anyway I can't help but believe that this guy wrote this post with the intent of getting banned... either that or he honestly never read any tl rules ever. Sometimes frustration gets the better of us, and since he plays Terran it's easy to understand that he'd be frustrated. winning can be frustrating sometimes I suppose :p Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 15:55 Myrddraal wrote:Wow his posting in that thread pissed me off a fair bit, especially the one with the ban notice, but I wasn't expecting a perm to come out of that. Can't really say I'm disappointed though. On June 11 2013 00:30 SamsungStar wrote:
Your analysis is terrible and it's obvious to me why you're a paralegal. Also, one law firm is not all law firms. And no, I don't play well with terrible players. It's a trait many good players share.
User was banned for this post. What thread was this in? I haven't seen this guys in a while, thought he was permed before.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409863¤tpage=20#386 Dota 2 report system thread.
|
On June 12 2013 14:17 EvilTeletubby wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 15:55 Myrddraal wrote:Wow his posting in that thread pissed me off a fair bit, especially the one with the ban notice, but I wasn't expecting a perm to come out of that. Can't really say I'm disappointed though. On June 11 2013 00:30 SamsungStar wrote:
Your analysis is terrible and it's obvious to me why you're a paralegal. Also, one law firm is not all law firms. And no, I don't play well with terrible players. It's a trait many good players share.
User was banned for this post. To be clear, this ban wasn't JUST because of that post. More like, it's been a long time coming and that just happened to be the post I had selected when I pulled the trigger.
Ah okay, that's not too surprising now that I think about it. Thank's for the heads up.
|
That guy is actually hilarious, in a way. Here's another gem of his.
On March 11 2013 08:19 SamsungStar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 08:07 sluggaslamoo wrote:On March 11 2013 07:03 SamsungStar wrote:On March 11 2013 06:58 FallDownMarigold wrote:On March 11 2013 06:50 SamsungStar wrote:On March 11 2013 06:33 sluggaslamoo wrote:On March 11 2013 06:21 SamsungStar wrote:
This thread is now going in circles, mostly due to a lack of people reading what's been said before. Sad.
To swallow56: A sword would not be a good idea in closed confines like an airplane. There are a number of much more effective weapons like a telescoping rod, a taser, or a tonfa.
To sluggamoo: I enjoyed your theory crafting and your listing of relevant experiences. Thank you. I also enjoyed how you completely contradicted yourself in your own post. There is nothing you can do against a knife, but a set of keys is sufficient to disarm a man with a crowbar. LOL.
And I'm not e-bragging. I'm simply telling you your analysis is wrong and it's because you lack relevant experience. Your irrational fear of knives is obvious in your posting. You also have clearly lost your way as to what's being discussed. This is not a 1 on 1 where a guy shanks you from behind in a dark alleyway while you have no clue what's going on. This is 1 - 3 terrorists trying to attack a population of 150 other passengers armed with little more than pocket knives. Stop going into unrelated topics. Do I have to post your quote for the 3rd time? What is up with people thinking like sheep? As if you've never had someone come at you with a knife before. It's honestly not that big a fking deal I didn't contradict myself, it explains my point perfectly. There's nothing you can do against an attacker with a knife who is intent on killing you. You could have a crowbar against someone with a knife, and it will do jack shit. Sorry for being blunt about your retarded post about how cool you are for being able to face knife attackers and nobody else can. You can continue with your irrational fear of knives. That's your own personal choice. But don't try to convince other people of your queer religion. I've faced people with knives intent on killing me and lived to tell the tale. I 100% guarantee that if you came at me with a knife and I had a crowbar you would be the one dying not me. Can we get some outside info on the matter? Right now it's just "me me me this is the case for me personally" for the both's of you's. Maybe there is some kind of report out there on what percentage of knife attacks result in injury or fatality, something a little bit more revealing on the matter than "this is my personal story about how I personally deal with knives" That wouldn't really tell us much. How many people are going to report non-fatal, non-injurious knife attacks? It's not me, me, me personally. Slugga has never been in a knife fight so he resorts to youtube videos and strange anecdotes about the slashing power of house keys. I have been in knife fights and can tell you there are multiple ways of dealing with a knife attack that go beyond just being stabbed to death. But yes, as the above poster stated, this is about pocket knives, not any other kind. Slugga is going way off-topic. Should I post this a 4th time? SamsungStar wrote:What is up with people thinking like sheep? As if you've never had someone come at you with a knife before. It's honestly not that big a fking deal You still brag about how cool you are for being able to deal with knife attacks which has nothing to do with the topic either. All I'm saying is that you are full of shit, I know that because everyone single person that acts like you do has never been in a serious fight before. Being mugged with a knife isn't even close, because he won't actually try to kill you even if you fight him. The average passenger on a plane does not have killing intent, he can wield whatever he wants but he wouldn't be able to prevent himself from getting killed by an attacker unless other people help him. Now it just comes down to can the attacker kill the victim and turn around in time to defend himself? Depends on the knife, a bunch of terrorists with box-cutters apparently could and flew the planes into a building. Doesn't matter what you say, that's what happened. If the terrorists were using the shitty knives they give you for meals, it would have been a completely different story, the pilots most likely would have been able to defend themselves, which is part of the debate here. I actually don't give a damn about the ruling, I think its fine. You just need to stop posting about how much cooler you are than everybody else because someone pointed a knife at you and didn't do shit. For some reason you believe there is an argument to be won here, there's not, just stop posting. Slugga, it's okay. Honestly. I'm sure you have other talents. But for now, I'm just flat out cooler than you because I can handle people with knives :\. That's just the reality both of us are going to have to accept. But you should be careful. People have told me I am a man with a great deal of killing intent. User was temp banned for this post.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
Relevant:
On June 12 2013 22:15 shekelberg wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2013 22:11 theking1 wrote:On June 12 2013 22:06 marvellosity wrote:On June 12 2013 21:59 ZeRoX-45 wrote:On June 12 2013 21:55 cloneThorN wrote:On June 12 2013 21:43 ZeRoX-45 wrote:
I am supportive about Russia and Ukraine about anti-homo laws. I wish my goverment could bring in the same legislative about this topic.
Main thing to question here is kind of the society you live in. In my country, Russia or some others, beng gay is unacceptable by large majority of people. So I do not understand the need if having marriages or parades if you know that people will brake half of the city apart that day or burn something if they accept gay marriages in some law. It's almost fault of gays as much as fault of people who do not want them on the streets.
On the other side, I know I can't change someones sexual behaviours but also I dont need to look at them few days per year. I dont also think orthodox chiristianity has something to do with this subject but here church(also Orthodox) is strongly opposing "pride" marches and that is one if the reasons here pride never sucedeed and never will. I would let them do whatever they want behind their walls but do not make us and our children watch that attrocious parade in the middle of capital. I agree on the pride thing. However, you said youself that you would "let them do whatever they want behind their walls", so why not just give them the same rights straights have? For instance, it will not affect straights at all, if gays are allowed to be married.(just an example). So why not just get it over with? The gay pride parades is a result of you oppressing them, so it's 100% your fault. You could easely make them stop the parades if you just give them the rights they want. I agree. I havent said that I wouldnt give them (some)rights. They are people after all. I would just like to stop parading and spreading homosexualism that much. But main thing is that here, parades arent really made for gays to get rights but to "inject finger in the eye" of straight people. Plus they get much of publicity as a unrelevant minority. Spreading homosexualism? What does that even mean :/ And please don't pretend you know what the purpose of gay parades is. he is one of those people who thinks homosexuality is a contagious desease and if you let gays marry each other they will launch a full blown campaign to corrupt our children into becoming homosexuals.In his mind gays are a sort of illuminaty type secret organization who day and night plan to corrupt heterosexuals especially heterosexual children into becoming gay.He also views the fact as letting gay having sex in their own bedroom as a sign of tolerance.Don't bother with him. You're the the one who believes that homosexuality grows on trees or is genetic or sonething stupid like that User was banned for this post.
From this thread. (don't read if allergic to completely uninformed bigots)
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
That's what I was referring to ^
Reported two of his posts in that thread alone, and checked out some of his other posts in different threads and they were all terrible too.
|
Germany25657 Posts
PM I received 15 seconds later
Go fuck yourself
|
Goodbye shekelberg, I barely knew thee and won't even miss thee.
But I seriously hoped to hear more from you in that thread.
I had a good laugh.
Thanks for the memories.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 12 2013 22:47 KadaverBB wrote:PM I received 15 seconds later
That makes it all the sweeter.
|
Big loss there, the use of, "grows on tress," was a curious choice given the subject matter in question. I don't think that will be the last ban we see out of that thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
