|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
^ Ahahaha that's great.
On May 03 2013 01:13 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +SupLilSon was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-10-08 10:33:08 and had 3164 posts.
Reason: Rape apologism.
Nausea was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-10-08 07:06:21 and had 448 posts.
Reason: Shitposting general.
edlover420 was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2012-12-27 04:56:53 and had 109 posts.
Reason: Literally "she was asking for it".
ain was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-07-29 00:15:43 and had 524 posts.
Reason: Bye.
Darkwhite was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2007-06-24 06:11:33 and had 13 posts.
Reason: Rape apologism. Best part of waking up, KwarK banning rape apologists in my cup!
Can't wait for new website feedback threads in a week or two. 
|
On May 03 2013 01:25 Kasaraki wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2013 01:13 farvacola wrote:SupLilSon was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-10-08 10:33:08 and had 3164 posts.
Reason: Rape apologism.
Nausea was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-10-08 07:06:21 and had 448 posts.
Reason: Shitposting general.
edlover420 was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2012-12-27 04:56:53 and had 109 posts.
Reason: Literally "she was asking for it".
ain was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-07-29 00:15:43 and had 524 posts.
Reason: Bye.
Darkwhite was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2007-06-24 06:11:33 and had 13 posts.
Reason: Rape apologism. Best part of waking up, KwarK banning rape apologists in my cup! I guess you could say... *puts on sunglasses* ... they were asking for it.
GG!
I find rape apologists one of the shittier things that goes on in general from time to time, but this is just the perfect response.
|
KwarK got sick self control
|
Wow, this is just as bad as reddit topics about marital rape.
|
On May 03 2013 01:35 MasterOfPuppets wrote:^ Ahahaha that's great. Show nested quote +On May 03 2013 01:13 farvacola wrote:SupLilSon was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-10-08 10:33:08 and had 3164 posts.
Reason: Rape apologism.
Nausea was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-10-08 07:06:21 and had 448 posts.
Reason: Shitposting general.
edlover420 was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2012-12-27 04:56:53 and had 109 posts.
Reason: Literally "she was asking for it".
ain was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-07-29 00:15:43 and had 524 posts.
Reason: Bye.
Darkwhite was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2007-06-24 06:11:33 and had 13 posts.
Reason: Rape apologism. Best part of waking up, KwarK banning rape apologists in my cup! Can't wait for new website feedback threads in a week or two.
SupLilSon has posted some really silly stuff before, but that shit was out of control. I don't understand people who believe stuff like that and insist on typing/saying it out loud. You think after touching the stove enough times, they might just keep it to themselves.
|
banning for opinions, even stupid ones, makes me a sad panda. the banned post wasnt even that bad.
On May 02 2013 22:56 Darkwhite wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2013 22:52 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 22:39 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 22:32 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 19:44 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 19:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 02 2013 19:35 Goozen wrote:On May 02 2013 19:29 Velr wrote:On May 02 2013 19:21 Goozen wrote:
The only solution is remove anonymity, nothing else will work. The bottom line is that there are 2 kinds of people who obey the law. Those that who do it because its a law, and those who fear the punishment that they will receive from breaking it. As long as this vocal minority isn't forced to receive consequences for their action, they won't change.
And lets face it, it doesn't help that a fair number of women use their sexuality as a tool to gain benefits. Then there are teenagers (the main adience of stuff like this?) which often don't give a shit if there is no imminent/direct punishment... Which there never can and will be for stuff like this. These are not even "easy" cases... I mean, where do you draw the line between harsh criticism or some "vulgar language" and ILLEGAL sexism/harrasment? You would need to have a Judge reading over all this and decide case by case... Oh... And your on the Internet, that means these "offenders" can come from any country in the world, witch basically all have diffrent laws... If she (or anyone else) can't deal with it... Then don't do it. It's not like actors or other TV-Persons have it "better", they normally just don't read immediate chat feedback. Your going out there in front of a camera, you will gate rated, insulted and objectified... Deal with it. I know, thats the problem. There is no way to stop or prevent this, the most that can happen is that moderates remove comments and ban people from youtube. But lets face it, i doubt that will happen also. Saying "if you can't deal with it, don't do it" is the wrong attitude. Using this logic the police can say "don't wear revealing/ provocative clothing if you don't want to get harassed". There is a problem, there simply isnt much we can do, but blaming her is not the correct action. I agree, blaming her is not the correct action. I personally am not blaming her for this happening, although I will blame her for being a hypocrite (see my other posts) and also for dealing with this in the completely wrong way. Ignore the trolls, get someone to ban/censor them for you, or smite them. Going public with this (as if it's a big deal, as if there aren't thousand of other YouTube and Twitch channels that deal with this shit just as much as her) and playing victim will NOT accomplish Anything AT ALL. EDIT: Or she can even realize that these trolls still contribute to her page views, video views, channel views etc and by commenting they push her videos higher up the YouTube ladder. So she's basically able to make more money thanks to this negative attention. Could probably try to exploit that instead of getting all pissy. You realise that women are trained from an early age not to cause a scene when men do things they're not comfortable. That it's just boys being boys and they should just put up with it, from leering to catcalling all the way up to harassment. That if a woman actually says "why don't you just fuck off" then suddenly she's hormonal, overreacting and a bitch. People blame women for rape when they don't fight enough or say "no" loudly enough and they call them attention seekers when they call out harassment. It's a no win situation. Who are these people you are talking about? Also, harrassment is punishable by law (unless you mean in Saudi Arabia). Trolls on the internet, however, are trolls on the internet. About 30% of the population will blame a victim for the rape. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html I will look for more serious sources, because the daily mail is a rather horrific source... however women should never be blamed for being the victim of rape. Just like men should never be blamed for being the victim of stabbing, even if they have worked up a ten thousand dollar debt to a drug dealer and is telling him to suck it when he shows up armed at his door. It would be naïve to assign any sort of responsibility to the victim. User was temp banned for this post.
|
On May 03 2013 04:43 dAPhREAk wrote:banning for opinions, even stupid ones, makes me a sad panda. the banned post wasnt even that bad. Show nested quote +On May 02 2013 22:56 Darkwhite wrote:On May 02 2013 22:52 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 22:39 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 22:32 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 19:44 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 19:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 02 2013 19:35 Goozen wrote:On May 02 2013 19:29 Velr wrote:On May 02 2013 19:21 Goozen wrote:
The only solution is remove anonymity, nothing else will work. The bottom line is that there are 2 kinds of people who obey the law. Those that who do it because its a law, and those who fear the punishment that they will receive from breaking it. As long as this vocal minority isn't forced to receive consequences for their action, they won't change.
And lets face it, it doesn't help that a fair number of women use their sexuality as a tool to gain benefits. Then there are teenagers (the main adience of stuff like this?) which often don't give a shit if there is no imminent/direct punishment... Which there never can and will be for stuff like this. These are not even "easy" cases... I mean, where do you draw the line between harsh criticism or some "vulgar language" and ILLEGAL sexism/harrasment? You would need to have a Judge reading over all this and decide case by case... Oh... And your on the Internet, that means these "offenders" can come from any country in the world, witch basically all have diffrent laws... If she (or anyone else) can't deal with it... Then don't do it. It's not like actors or other TV-Persons have it "better", they normally just don't read immediate chat feedback. Your going out there in front of a camera, you will gate rated, insulted and objectified... Deal with it. I know, thats the problem. There is no way to stop or prevent this, the most that can happen is that moderates remove comments and ban people from youtube. But lets face it, i doubt that will happen also. Saying "if you can't deal with it, don't do it" is the wrong attitude. Using this logic the police can say "don't wear revealing/ provocative clothing if you don't want to get harassed". There is a problem, there simply isnt much we can do, but blaming her is not the correct action. I agree, blaming her is not the correct action. I personally am not blaming her for this happening, although I will blame her for being a hypocrite (see my other posts) and also for dealing with this in the completely wrong way. Ignore the trolls, get someone to ban/censor them for you, or smite them. Going public with this (as if it's a big deal, as if there aren't thousand of other YouTube and Twitch channels that deal with this shit just as much as her) and playing victim will NOT accomplish Anything AT ALL. EDIT: Or she can even realize that these trolls still contribute to her page views, video views, channel views etc and by commenting they push her videos higher up the YouTube ladder. So she's basically able to make more money thanks to this negative attention. Could probably try to exploit that instead of getting all pissy. You realise that women are trained from an early age not to cause a scene when men do things they're not comfortable. That it's just boys being boys and they should just put up with it, from leering to catcalling all the way up to harassment. That if a woman actually says "why don't you just fuck off" then suddenly she's hormonal, overreacting and a bitch. People blame women for rape when they don't fight enough or say "no" loudly enough and they call them attention seekers when they call out harassment. It's a no win situation. Who are these people you are talking about? Also, harrassment is punishable by law (unless you mean in Saudi Arabia). Trolls on the internet, however, are trolls on the internet. About 30% of the population will blame a victim for the rape. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html I will look for more serious sources, because the daily mail is a rather horrific source... however women should never be blamed for being the victim of rape. Just like men should never be blamed for being the victim of stabbing, even if they have worked up a ten thousand dollar debt to a drug dealer and is telling him to suck it when he shows up armed at his door. It would be naïve to assign any sort of responsibility to the victim. User was temp banned for this post.
Make a thread about it. It's been a while since KwarK's had to deal with that shit. 
|
That thread has turned into a bantrap for anyone and everyone who doesn't verbalize their opinion perfectly. Slip on a word or two and bam, you're looking down the long nose of a mod.
|
On May 03 2013 04:44 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2013 04:43 dAPhREAk wrote:banning for opinions, even stupid ones, makes me a sad panda. the banned post wasnt even that bad. On May 02 2013 22:56 Darkwhite wrote:On May 02 2013 22:52 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 22:39 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 22:32 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 19:44 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 19:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 02 2013 19:35 Goozen wrote:On May 02 2013 19:29 Velr wrote:
[quote]
Then there are teenagers (the main adience of stuff like this?) which often don't give a shit if there is no imminent/direct punishment... Which there never can and will be for stuff like this.
These are not even "easy" cases... I mean, where do you draw the line between harsh criticism or some "vulgar language" and ILLEGAL sexism/harrasment? You would need to have a Judge reading over all this and decide case by case...
Oh... And your on the Internet, that means these "offenders" can come from any country in the world, witch basically all have diffrent laws...
If she (or anyone else) can't deal with it... Then don't do it. It's not like actors or other TV-Persons have it "better", they normally just don't read immediate chat feedback. Your going out there in front of a camera, you will gate rated, insulted and objectified... Deal with it. I know, thats the problem. There is no way to stop or prevent this, the most that can happen is that moderates remove comments and ban people from youtube. But lets face it, i doubt that will happen also. Saying "if you can't deal with it, don't do it" is the wrong attitude. Using this logic the police can say "don't wear revealing/ provocative clothing if you don't want to get harassed". There is a problem, there simply isnt much we can do, but blaming her is not the correct action. I agree, blaming her is not the correct action. I personally am not blaming her for this happening, although I will blame her for being a hypocrite (see my other posts) and also for dealing with this in the completely wrong way. Ignore the trolls, get someone to ban/censor them for you, or smite them. Going public with this (as if it's a big deal, as if there aren't thousand of other YouTube and Twitch channels that deal with this shit just as much as her) and playing victim will NOT accomplish Anything AT ALL. EDIT: Or she can even realize that these trolls still contribute to her page views, video views, channel views etc and by commenting they push her videos higher up the YouTube ladder. So she's basically able to make more money thanks to this negative attention. Could probably try to exploit that instead of getting all pissy. You realise that women are trained from an early age not to cause a scene when men do things they're not comfortable. That it's just boys being boys and they should just put up with it, from leering to catcalling all the way up to harassment. That if a woman actually says "why don't you just fuck off" then suddenly she's hormonal, overreacting and a bitch. People blame women for rape when they don't fight enough or say "no" loudly enough and they call them attention seekers when they call out harassment. It's a no win situation. Who are these people you are talking about? Also, harrassment is punishable by law (unless you mean in Saudi Arabia). Trolls on the internet, however, are trolls on the internet. About 30% of the population will blame a victim for the rape. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html I will look for more serious sources, because the daily mail is a rather horrific source... however women should never be blamed for being the victim of rape. Just like men should never be blamed for being the victim of stabbing, even if they have worked up a ten thousand dollar debt to a drug dealer and is telling him to suck it when he shows up armed at his door. It would be naïve to assign any sort of responsibility to the victim. User was temp banned for this post. Make a thread about it. It's been a while since KwarK's had to deal with that shit.
already neatly filed away.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On May 03 2013 04:43 dAPhREAk wrote:banning for opinions, even stupid ones, makes me a sad panda. the banned post wasnt even that bad. Show nested quote +On May 02 2013 22:56 Darkwhite wrote:On May 02 2013 22:52 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 22:39 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 22:32 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 19:44 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 19:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 02 2013 19:35 Goozen wrote:On May 02 2013 19:29 Velr wrote:On May 02 2013 19:21 Goozen wrote:
The only solution is remove anonymity, nothing else will work. The bottom line is that there are 2 kinds of people who obey the law. Those that who do it because its a law, and those who fear the punishment that they will receive from breaking it. As long as this vocal minority isn't forced to receive consequences for their action, they won't change.
And lets face it, it doesn't help that a fair number of women use their sexuality as a tool to gain benefits. Then there are teenagers (the main adience of stuff like this?) which often don't give a shit if there is no imminent/direct punishment... Which there never can and will be for stuff like this. These are not even "easy" cases... I mean, where do you draw the line between harsh criticism or some "vulgar language" and ILLEGAL sexism/harrasment? You would need to have a Judge reading over all this and decide case by case... Oh... And your on the Internet, that means these "offenders" can come from any country in the world, witch basically all have diffrent laws... If she (or anyone else) can't deal with it... Then don't do it. It's not like actors or other TV-Persons have it "better", they normally just don't read immediate chat feedback. Your going out there in front of a camera, you will gate rated, insulted and objectified... Deal with it. I know, thats the problem. There is no way to stop or prevent this, the most that can happen is that moderates remove comments and ban people from youtube. But lets face it, i doubt that will happen also. Saying "if you can't deal with it, don't do it" is the wrong attitude. Using this logic the police can say "don't wear revealing/ provocative clothing if you don't want to get harassed". There is a problem, there simply isnt much we can do, but blaming her is not the correct action. I agree, blaming her is not the correct action. I personally am not blaming her for this happening, although I will blame her for being a hypocrite (see my other posts) and also for dealing with this in the completely wrong way. Ignore the trolls, get someone to ban/censor them for you, or smite them. Going public with this (as if it's a big deal, as if there aren't thousand of other YouTube and Twitch channels that deal with this shit just as much as her) and playing victim will NOT accomplish Anything AT ALL. EDIT: Or she can even realize that these trolls still contribute to her page views, video views, channel views etc and by commenting they push her videos higher up the YouTube ladder. So she's basically able to make more money thanks to this negative attention. Could probably try to exploit that instead of getting all pissy. You realise that women are trained from an early age not to cause a scene when men do things they're not comfortable. That it's just boys being boys and they should just put up with it, from leering to catcalling all the way up to harassment. That if a woman actually says "why don't you just fuck off" then suddenly she's hormonal, overreacting and a bitch. People blame women for rape when they don't fight enough or say "no" loudly enough and they call them attention seekers when they call out harassment. It's a no win situation. Who are these people you are talking about? Also, harrassment is punishable by law (unless you mean in Saudi Arabia). Trolls on the internet, however, are trolls on the internet. About 30% of the population will blame a victim for the rape. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html I will look for more serious sources, because the daily mail is a rather horrific source... however women should never be blamed for being the victim of rape. Just like men should never be blamed for being the victim of stabbing, even if they have worked up a ten thousand dollar debt to a drug dealer and is telling him to suck it when he shows up armed at his door. It would be naïve to assign any sort of responsibility to the victim. User was temp banned for this post.
Some opinions are so stupid that they are a risk to the well being of others. Like radiation, sarin gas and spoiled mayonnaise, they must be contained.
|
United States43035 Posts
On May 03 2013 04:43 dAPhREAk wrote:banning for opinions, even stupid ones, makes me a sad panda. the banned post wasnt even that bad. Show nested quote +On May 02 2013 22:56 Darkwhite wrote:On May 02 2013 22:52 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 22:39 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 22:32 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 19:44 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 19:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 02 2013 19:35 Goozen wrote:On May 02 2013 19:29 Velr wrote:On May 02 2013 19:21 Goozen wrote:
The only solution is remove anonymity, nothing else will work. The bottom line is that there are 2 kinds of people who obey the law. Those that who do it because its a law, and those who fear the punishment that they will receive from breaking it. As long as this vocal minority isn't forced to receive consequences for their action, they won't change.
And lets face it, it doesn't help that a fair number of women use their sexuality as a tool to gain benefits. Then there are teenagers (the main adience of stuff like this?) which often don't give a shit if there is no imminent/direct punishment... Which there never can and will be for stuff like this. These are not even "easy" cases... I mean, where do you draw the line between harsh criticism or some "vulgar language" and ILLEGAL sexism/harrasment? You would need to have a Judge reading over all this and decide case by case... Oh... And your on the Internet, that means these "offenders" can come from any country in the world, witch basically all have diffrent laws... If she (or anyone else) can't deal with it... Then don't do it. It's not like actors or other TV-Persons have it "better", they normally just don't read immediate chat feedback. Your going out there in front of a camera, you will gate rated, insulted and objectified... Deal with it. I know, thats the problem. There is no way to stop or prevent this, the most that can happen is that moderates remove comments and ban people from youtube. But lets face it, i doubt that will happen also. Saying "if you can't deal with it, don't do it" is the wrong attitude. Using this logic the police can say "don't wear revealing/ provocative clothing if you don't want to get harassed". There is a problem, there simply isnt much we can do, but blaming her is not the correct action. I agree, blaming her is not the correct action. I personally am not blaming her for this happening, although I will blame her for being a hypocrite (see my other posts) and also for dealing with this in the completely wrong way. Ignore the trolls, get someone to ban/censor them for you, or smite them. Going public with this (as if it's a big deal, as if there aren't thousand of other YouTube and Twitch channels that deal with this shit just as much as her) and playing victim will NOT accomplish Anything AT ALL. EDIT: Or she can even realize that these trolls still contribute to her page views, video views, channel views etc and by commenting they push her videos higher up the YouTube ladder. So she's basically able to make more money thanks to this negative attention. Could probably try to exploit that instead of getting all pissy. You realise that women are trained from an early age not to cause a scene when men do things they're not comfortable. That it's just boys being boys and they should just put up with it, from leering to catcalling all the way up to harassment. That if a woman actually says "why don't you just fuck off" then suddenly she's hormonal, overreacting and a bitch. People blame women for rape when they don't fight enough or say "no" loudly enough and they call them attention seekers when they call out harassment. It's a no win situation. Who are these people you are talking about? Also, harrassment is punishable by law (unless you mean in Saudi Arabia). Trolls on the internet, however, are trolls on the internet. About 30% of the population will blame a victim for the rape. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html I will look for more serious sources, because the daily mail is a rather horrific source... however women should never be blamed for being the victim of rape. Just like men should never be blamed for being the victim of stabbing, even if they have worked up a ten thousand dollar debt to a drug dealer and is telling him to suck it when he shows up armed at his door. It would be naïve to assign any sort of responsibility to the victim. User was temp banned for this post.
Women who get raped after consuming alcohol, wearing revealing clothing or being sexually active are not comparable to people who go to a criminal loan shark, refuse to pay them back and then insult the guy. Suggesting that the two actions are comparable, along with the implication that men are not expected to hold themselves to any standard beyond that of the criminal loan shark, is part of standard rape apologism. Fortunately, even if I just banned him on a whim by his own logic the ban is justified. Apparently anyone can assign provocation to anything anyone else does and then do what they like and blame the victim.
|
Honestly, whenever topics like this come up I'm happy to have someone on the moderation team who can so concisely see through the BS. Rape apology is digusting, and sadly still quite harmful to society.
|
That thread has turned out to be a bantrap. Second reply in that thread summed up my feelings perfectly. Even as heavily moderated as TL is, if I was not a guy, I wouldn't be here. A lot of the banned posts and even not banned posts pretty much go, "If you are female and you interact with gamers, you are asking for sexist insults to be thrown your way." And these idiots wonder why gamers have the reputation we do.
|
On May 03 2013 05:07 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2013 04:43 dAPhREAk wrote:banning for opinions, even stupid ones, makes me a sad panda. the banned post wasnt even that bad. On May 02 2013 22:56 Darkwhite wrote:On May 02 2013 22:52 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 22:39 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 22:32 Acrofales wrote:On May 02 2013 19:44 KwarK wrote:On May 02 2013 19:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On May 02 2013 19:35 Goozen wrote:On May 02 2013 19:29 Velr wrote:
[quote]
Then there are teenagers (the main adience of stuff like this?) which often don't give a shit if there is no imminent/direct punishment... Which there never can and will be for stuff like this.
These are not even "easy" cases... I mean, where do you draw the line between harsh criticism or some "vulgar language" and ILLEGAL sexism/harrasment? You would need to have a Judge reading over all this and decide case by case...
Oh... And your on the Internet, that means these "offenders" can come from any country in the world, witch basically all have diffrent laws...
If she (or anyone else) can't deal with it... Then don't do it. It's not like actors or other TV-Persons have it "better", they normally just don't read immediate chat feedback. Your going out there in front of a camera, you will gate rated, insulted and objectified... Deal with it. I know, thats the problem. There is no way to stop or prevent this, the most that can happen is that moderates remove comments and ban people from youtube. But lets face it, i doubt that will happen also. Saying "if you can't deal with it, don't do it" is the wrong attitude. Using this logic the police can say "don't wear revealing/ provocative clothing if you don't want to get harassed". There is a problem, there simply isnt much we can do, but blaming her is not the correct action. I agree, blaming her is not the correct action. I personally am not blaming her for this happening, although I will blame her for being a hypocrite (see my other posts) and also for dealing with this in the completely wrong way. Ignore the trolls, get someone to ban/censor them for you, or smite them. Going public with this (as if it's a big deal, as if there aren't thousand of other YouTube and Twitch channels that deal with this shit just as much as her) and playing victim will NOT accomplish Anything AT ALL. EDIT: Or she can even realize that these trolls still contribute to her page views, video views, channel views etc and by commenting they push her videos higher up the YouTube ladder. So she's basically able to make more money thanks to this negative attention. Could probably try to exploit that instead of getting all pissy. You realise that women are trained from an early age not to cause a scene when men do things they're not comfortable. That it's just boys being boys and they should just put up with it, from leering to catcalling all the way up to harassment. That if a woman actually says "why don't you just fuck off" then suddenly she's hormonal, overreacting and a bitch. People blame women for rape when they don't fight enough or say "no" loudly enough and they call them attention seekers when they call out harassment. It's a no win situation. Who are these people you are talking about? Also, harrassment is punishable by law (unless you mean in Saudi Arabia). Trolls on the internet, however, are trolls on the internet. About 30% of the population will blame a victim for the rape. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html I will look for more serious sources, because the daily mail is a rather horrific source... however women should never be blamed for being the victim of rape. Just like men should never be blamed for being the victim of stabbing, even if they have worked up a ten thousand dollar debt to a drug dealer and is telling him to suck it when he shows up armed at his door. It would be naïve to assign any sort of responsibility to the victim. User was temp banned for this post. Women who get raped after consuming alcohol, wearing revealing clothing or being sexually active are not comparable to people who go to a criminal loan shark, refuse to pay them back and then insult the guy. Suggesting that the two actions are comparable, along with the implication that men are not expected to hold themselves to any standard beyond that of the criminal loan shark, is part of standard rape apologism. Fortunately, even if I just banned him on a whim by his own logic the ban is justified. Apparently anyone can assign provocation to anything anyone else does and then do what they like and blame the victim.
congratulations. rather than telling him he holds a retarded opinion and explaining it, you have removed him from the forum and accomplished very little. you have not furthered discussion; you have not refuted his point; you have just banned him for holding an opinion that you disagree with (i wont even get into the fact that you were part of the discussion as well).
by the way, "blaming" the victim is not only a permissible legal strategy (with some caveats of course), it is a well documented and used strategy in rape trials. i wonder how many judges and lawyers you would ban from the the oh so sacred teamliquid general forum for agreeing that the victim should be assigned responsibility.
before the knee-pads come out, i agree with you that his opinion is shitty, but i also think your banning him for it is shitty considering his other posts in the thread were not bad (although i wont say i agree with him) and the banned post really wasnt that bad.
|
United States43035 Posts
Judges and lawyers aren't some special moral group that are better than the rest of us, I have no doubt there are plenty of them with disgusting opinions that won't be tolerated on tl. You're right, I could explain why he was wrong rather than ban him. But I can also explain why he is wrong and ban him and that way we have less rape apologism on the forum. I see that as a worthy end and therefore disagree that I have accomplished very little.
|
Lalalaland34495 Posts
Wtf Kwark were you posting all of this during our Dota game, no wonder we lost.
|
United States43035 Posts
I was literally arguing in that topic earlier while playing dota to the point that I got mass reported by my team. Still won.
|
On May 03 2013 05:30 KwarK wrote:
Judges and lawyers aren't some special moral group that are better than the rest of us, I have no doubt there are plenty of them with disgusting opinions that won't be tolerated on tl. You're right, I could explain why he was wrong rather than ban him. But I can also explain why he is wrong and ban him and that way we have less rape apologism on the forum. I see that as a worthy end and therefore disagree that I have accomplished very little.
i was referring not to the fact that they hold disgusting opinions, which is undoubtedly true as to some, but that they recognize the legal legitimacy of "blaming" the victim. something you appear to have zero tolerance for despite the legitimacy it holds in society at least as to legal matters.
keep with your narrow view of the world though where you choose to ban instead of addressing opinions you dont agree with. i am sure it will work out well for you in the end.
|
United States43035 Posts
On May 03 2013 05:36 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2013 05:30 KwarK wrote:
Judges and lawyers aren't some special moral group that are better than the rest of us, I have no doubt there are plenty of them with disgusting opinions that won't be tolerated on tl. You're right, I could explain why he was wrong rather than ban him. But I can also explain why he is wrong and ban him and that way we have less rape apologism on the forum. I see that as a worthy end and therefore disagree that I have accomplished very little. i was referring not to the fact that they hold disgusting opinions, which is undoubtedly true as to some, but that they recognize the legal legitimacy of "blaming" the victim. something you appear to have zero tolerance for despite the legitimacy it holds in society at least as to legal matters. keep with your narrow view of the world though where you choose to ban instead of addressing opinions you dont agree with. i am sure it will work out well for you in the end.
Juries are fucking retarded because the general population are fucking retarded. The fact that a jury can be convinced that a woman deserved it because she was a slut or that a black guy did it because let's face it, they're all the same, does not make the arguments good ones.
I don't have the power to moderate the world but on team liquid I'll do what I can.
|
On May 03 2013 05:36 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2013 05:30 KwarK wrote:
Judges and lawyers aren't some special moral group that are better than the rest of us, I have no doubt there are plenty of them with disgusting opinions that won't be tolerated on tl. You're right, I could explain why he was wrong rather than ban him. But I can also explain why he is wrong and ban him and that way we have less rape apologism on the forum. I see that as a worthy end and therefore disagree that I have accomplished very little. i was referring not to the fact that they hold disgusting opinions, which is undoubtedly true as to some, but that they recognize the legal legitimacy of "blaming" the victim. something you appear to have zero tolerance for despite the legitimacy it holds in society at least as to legal matters. keep with your narrow view of the world though where you choose to ban instead of addressing opinions you dont agree with. i am sure it will work out well for you in the end.
Legal legitimacy is a pretty low bar considering that defense lawyers have a legal obligation to throw the kitchen sink at jurors. These sound like the arguments of overburdened public defenders just going through the motions. Sometimes it sticks, but non-retarded jurors just roll their eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://live-cartoonsy.s3.amazonaws.com/preview/263/78ca31f61e075ad)
