EPTedited....
The Automated Ban List - Page 1648
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
edited.... | ||
|
farvacola
United States18855 Posts
| ||
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
On January 09 2013 05:19 KwarK wrote: Neversummer easily over Kliedxl. That guy was glorious. To encourage you all to vote for neversummer I am going to declassify a few gems he sent me (unless some admins think that PMs sent to me are presumed privileged and want to edit all this out). Fortunately a lot of this was already made public by him when complaining about me but it's still nice to put it all in one place. + Show Spoiler + Original Message From neversummer: Homophobia? I said gay men should not lead boy scout troops. That qualifies as homophobia? Are you an omnipresent being who is capable of deciphering the motives, rationale and reasoning for the thoughts and opinions of others? How can you possibly determine, with absolute certainty, that I am homophobic merely for that opinion? Secondly, you ASSUME I am implying something? Is that a fucking joke? You're banning people for what they're implying, even when they're not implying anything at all? Holy shit dude, get some fucking perspective. If you are a gay man, that's fine, but don't abuse your privilege as a mod on these forums to pursue your own pro-gay agenda. My so-called "mod-history" is two temp bans from GMarshal for similar reasons; people abusing mod privileges to ban people whose opinions are not congruent with their own. Unbelievable man. Who do I contact for personal complaints Original Message From KwarK: We have a website feedback forum which we use for website feedback. If you'd like to give any website feedback then I recommend you take it to the website feedback forum. It can be found at the bottom of the left sidebar where the word website is followed by the word feedback. If you continue to have problems finding it then please let me know. If you are still angry about the ban and wish to do something about it immediately then you could write us a letter. Just put whatever words you think are pertinent on a piece of paper and then put it in a mailbox. Original Message From neversummer: Is that some sort of joke? Your sense of humor eludes me. Anyway I'd appreciate it if you actually answered my message and acknowledged my rebuttal, as per your responsibility as moderator. You have banned me, and I have refuted your rationale for doing so. You have not answered my rebuttal, you have not addressed it and instead you've made a sore attempt at a joke. Original Message From KwarK: I'm not sure you understand how this works. I wasn't laying down a challenge for a competition at arguing on the internet and I have absolutely no interest in engaging with you in one. I just banned you, that's pretty much it for my involvement in the matter. Original Message From neversummer: I'm not quite certain you understand how this works. I've contacted another moderator, who has instructed me in order to lift my ban I must present a case for rebuttal, whereby if said case is accepted the ban will be lifted. Accordingly I have submitted my rebuttal to you, with every ounce of civility I can muster, and you respond by disregarding my rebuttal and personally insulting me by both questioning my intelligence and belittling my original response. Once again I'd appreciate some transparency in moderation; could you please respond to my rebuttal and offer reasons why my ban should remain in place? Original Message From KwarK: Okay, consider your case read and dismissed. If you feel you've been treated unfairly by the process then we have a website feedback forum. Original Message From neversummer: You've fucked with the wrong person. Original Message From neversummer: See you in two weeks  More will be declassified with each round neversummer survives. Should be fine since they've put PM in Pony Tales Liquileaks. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On January 09 2013 06:39 opisska wrote: Anyway, I can tell you, this is way easier than the presidental elections we have this weekend. Actually, both cases are very similar, as you have a bunch of idiots to choose from, but only in one of them you get to value the idiocy itself. Well I am sure you can value the candidates' idiocy the difference it would seem is that here, they have no direct legal influence. XD | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On January 09 2013 06:34 farvacola wrote: jd was seeded though, we haven't voted on him yet! oops, i meant neversummer. he made that website feedback thread that was good for many lulz. | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
On January 09 2013 06:30 dAPhREAk wrote: i voted for neversummer because he was the most amusing of all the ban nominees because he wouldn't let it go and made the website feedback thread; if i was voting based on most amusing banned post itself, the other guy would win. plus, kwark is cheating by adding more amusing anecdotes. edited.... i feel really bad ive missed out on these irc rants... im so voting for jd in the semifinals, but let's be honest. in the finals, failsafe is a juggernaut of olympian proportions and it's going to be hard for jd to top him. | ||
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
BTW: Kadaver did you make this poll? <3 | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=340100 http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=341966 Some favorites. JD may have been paranoid, but Failsafe couldn't stop in Neversummer's Belfry. | ||
|
truthtopower8
2 Posts
Unless, of course, they made the comments BEFORE they became mods!!! I present the newest addition to TL moderation: Myles United States. October 24 2012 09:26. Posts 2926 PM Profile Blog Quote # I tend to agree that Kwark is much more inclined to insult and belittle posters he moderates. And while TL has never been built on equality, I don't think it speaks well when a moderator more than occasionally says things to members that would get a normal poster warned/banned. +100 respect to Myles for speaking this truth. Also glad to see the two newest additions to the moderation appear to be reasonable, fair, and respectful individuals. Thanks to ABL Award links for helping me catch this gem By the way Kwark stop cheating. And PM's stand for PRIVATE MESSAGES. Meaning not posted publicly without their permission. User was banned for this post. | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
| ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34502 Posts
| ||
|
truthtopower8
2 Posts
| ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
Power to the truth indeed, that is why kwark needs to release em all ^^ | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
Someone ran out of 2000 accounts pretty quickly. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
On January 09 2013 07:29 andrewlt wrote: Poor hanclan. He's coming across as a neversummer lite who unfortunately matched up against affinity_12 in the first round. As much as jd amuses me, I think affinity_12 and failsafe are the strongest contenders. Too bad they are in the same bracket. I agree. I personally favor affinity_12 but have the feeling Failsafe will make it through that battle. affinity_12 vs Failsafe is the real finale for me. I think whoever advances will take the crown. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14104 Posts
Gets me every fucking time. | ||
| ||
