EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1523
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
On November 28 2012 03:33 dAPhREAk wrote: all those bans in the pvz guide monk put together. jesus christ. how can you be an ass to someone who did so much work to put that guide together.... Unfortunately that is a common occurrence. I swore off ever making an OP in SC2 forum again. Now I won't even make a post in there. It's like a cess pool of negativity. Edit: Holy shit, just saw the thread. It's fucking massive. Must have taken weeks to put together. | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On November 28 2012 03:49 jdseemoreglass wrote: Unfortunately that is a common occurrence. I swore off ever making an OP in SC2 forum again. Now I won't even make a post in there. It's like a cess pool of negativity. Edit: Holy shit, just saw the thread. It's fucking massive. Must have taken weeks to put together. Wow that is great, maybe I'll un-hide the strat forum if this is the kind of thing people are doing. Restores my faith in SC2 community somewhat. | ||
monk
United States8477 Posts
On November 28 2012 03:49 jdseemoreglass wrote: Unfortunately that is a common occurrence. I swore off ever making an OP in SC2 forum again. Now I won't even make a post in there. It's like a cess pool of negativity. Edit: Holy shit, just saw the thread. It's fucking massive. Must have taken weeks to put together. In the first paragraph, it says it took 9 months. =O Negative response wasn't bad at all tbh, It was actually a generally overwhelmingly positive response. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On November 28 2012 04:41 monk. wrote: In the first paragraph, it says it took 9 months. =O so, basically, its your baby. thats a long gestation period. ;-) it is quite impressive btw. | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On November 28 2012 04:41 monk. wrote: In the first paragraph, it says it took 9 months. =O Negative response wasn't bad at all tbh, It was actually a generally overwhelmingly positive response. You should do a meta-thread about the thread - - did you start with an overall structure and attempt cover all areas, if so how did settle on the structure? - or did you bring together a lot of guides on separate aspects and come up with a structure that way? - how did you cope with changes in metagame during this period? And possibly a thread about that thread too. There would need to be a literal internet's worth of negativity with associated bans to counter balance the awesomeness created by that amount of work and co-operation. Well done! | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37121 Posts
Why would anyone have negative comments for a strategy guide that was purely done by volunteers who just wanted to give back to the community? | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On November 28 2012 06:08 SeeKeR wrote: Wait I'm so confused... Why would anyone have negative comments for a strategy guide that was purely done by volunteers who just wanted to give back to the community? Jealousy | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
| ||
|
NicolBolas
United States1388 Posts
On November 28 2012 02:15 Cokefreak wrote: Well you don't see pro's banned every day. I looked through his last five posts, and none of them were something other than balance whining. I have to say, coupling balance whine with sexism is a new one for me. | ||
|
NicolBolas
United States1388 Posts
On November 28 2012 06:08 SeeKeR wrote: Wait I'm so confused... Why would anyone have negative comments for a strategy guide that was purely done by volunteers who just wanted to give back to the community? Because they're massive tools. Or because they're butthurt and balance whining. Or both, really; it's dealer's choice. | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On November 28 2012 10:04 NicolBolas wrote: I looked through his last five posts, and none of them were something other than balance whining. I have to say, coupling balance whine with sexism is a new one for me. Zergs are OP because of QUEENS, and Kerrigan the leader of zerg is a girl I mean wtf get back in the kitchen. Am I doing it right. | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
On November 28 2012 10:09 Caihead wrote: Zergs are OP because of QUEENS, and Kerrigan the leader of zerg is a girl I mean wtf get back in the kitchen. Am I doing it right. Wow, you almost made me speechless there, that's pretty much spot on ._. | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On November 28 2012 10:11 Cokefreak wrote: Wow, you almost made me speechless there, that's pretty much spot on ._. All my time observing bans through stained double layer windows has paid off I guess. I could go on: + Show Spoiler + Protoss' are soooo pussy-wiped even though they have bad ass men leaders they let some dumb drunk bimbo who can't drive straight pilot their capitol ship so its always spinning aroud in a circle who routinely crashes it right into infestors I mean WTF and they even let a woman become an executor in that campaign mission I mean wtf men can fly carriers fine why let a woman do it and we all know the only reason why banshees can't shoot up is because women are condescending and only want to look down on their viking pilott husband. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On November 28 2012 10:15 Caihead wrote: All my time observing bans through stained double layer windows has paid off I guess. I could go on: + Show Spoiler + Protoss' are soooo pussy-wiped even though they have bad ass men leaders they let some dumb drunk bimbo who can't drive straight pilot their capitol ship so its always spinning aroud in a circle who routinely crashes it right into infestors I mean WTF and they even let a woman become an executor in that campaign mission I mean wtf men can fly carriers fine why let a woman do it and we all know the only reason why banshees can't shoot up is because women are condescending and only want to look down on their viking pilott husband. Biggest smile I've had in a while. Cheers! | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14277 Posts
On November 28 2012 10:15 Caihead wrote: All my time observing bans through stained double layer windows has paid off I guess. I could go on: + Show Spoiler + Protoss' are soooo pussy-wiped even though they have bad ass men leaders they let some dumb drunk bimbo who can't drive straight pilot their capitol ship so its always spinning aroud in a circle who routinely crashes it right into infestors I mean WTF and they even let a woman become an executor in that campaign mission I mean wtf men can fly carriers fine why let a woman do it and we all know the only reason why banshees can't shoot up is because women are condescending and only want to look down on their viking pilott husband. Well played sir well played. On a side note why the hell people can be assholes to people who worked there asses off to make a amazing pvz/zvp guide i mean jesus..... | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On November 28 2012 11:07 LightningStrike wrote: Well played sir well played. On a side note why the hell people can be assholes to peope who there asses off to make a amazing pvz/zvp guide i mean jesus..... Well, real life is often much more cruel, just ask any aspiring... anyone who's trying to do something meaningful instead of being successful. At least the comments were largely positive. | ||
|
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
Why do we post here? The schadenfreude of the ban. Quick, get some popcorn. | ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
On November 28 2012 10:09 Caihead wrote: Zergs are OP because of QUEENS, and Kerrigan the leader of zerg is a girl I mean wtf get back in the kitchen. Am I doing it right. For some reason I read Kerrigan as Kennigit and got very, very confused. | ||
|
brian
United States9644 Posts
| ||
| ||
