|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On November 07 2012 15:09 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 15:07 Azera wrote:LOL Aezur was just temp banned for 2 days by Plexa.
That account was created on 2012-11-07 13:43:47 and had 10 posts.
Reason: Quit shitstirring.
NotAezur was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-11-07 14:23:34 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user.
That guy made every obama supporter on team liquid look bad, thats how hard he was shit stirring. Yeah he seemed like a real douche bag. Glad he's banned.
|
I'm surprised it wasn't someones alt account. He registered on election night and immediately started saying incendiary crap. He didn't make Obama supporters look bad- he just looked like a feeble troll. (He compared Mitt Romney to Hitler)
|
This is my fave from the election thread tonight:
On November 07 2012 14:10 TheNikeYork wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 14:09 TwoToneTerran wrote:On November 07 2012 14:07 TheNikeYork wrote:On November 07 2012 14:04 TwoToneTerran wrote:On November 07 2012 14:02 TheNikeYork wrote:On November 07 2012 14:00 Aezur wrote:On November 07 2012 13:58 Medrea wrote:On November 07 2012 13:57 Aezur wrote:On November 07 2012 13:55 Probe1 wrote:On November 07 2012 13:55 Aezur wrote: [quote]
No, did you quote me just to argue with my views on politics? It isn't your opinions. It is your uncivil method of expressing them. Except the concentration camp thing. Fuck off with that. Did I hit a nerve? You probably also think 9/11 was a conspiracy theory and the illuminati actually exists. Can I just think one of those? Illuminati did exist at one point in time. You can think whatever you want. I just don't understand why people wanted romney to win in the first place. He's made so many mistakes and everyone just goes along with it. He openly said he was against gay marriage, and the only reason he ever said he didn't want the sopa is because that's what people wanted to hear from him. He even just got indicted because he got caught stealing money and putting it in an account in his wifes name or something. Is that really the kind of person you want running our country? I truthfully think we shouldn't let the homos get married. Glad Obama won. If you wanna marry your boyfriend, goto Canada. Good ol bigotry. I'm just posting my opinion, man. No need to start calling me a bigot. I don't like gays. Opinions man. You're opinion is bigoted, I'm just stating a fact. Saying you dislike a whole, enormous group of people because of something that has no effect on you is bigoted. You are factually a bigot. You're perfectly allowed to be a bigot, it's just obvious that it's bad because you don't want to be called one despite clearly stating you are. I am opinion are bigot? User was temp banned for this post.
Combination of incomprehensible grammar and defending the indefensible.
|
On November 07 2012 13:17 Grobyc wrote: We don't?
;D
If he does, it will be a race to see who can nominate him first for the ban awards.
|
How did I miss this craziness?! Gaahh!! Praaaeeee!!! WHTF?! X-D
Kind of expected the Election thread to go ballistic over the results from last night, regardless of who won. Guess most of the rabble-rousers in that thread are still serving bans? I'd fall out of my chair laughing if someone gets banned for anything along the lines of "electoral college imba" or "NERF X PARTY".
|
On November 07 2012 20:42 ControlMonkey wrote:This is my fave from the election thread tonight: Show nested quote +On November 07 2012 14:10 TheNikeYork wrote:On November 07 2012 14:09 TwoToneTerran wrote:On November 07 2012 14:07 TheNikeYork wrote:On November 07 2012 14:04 TwoToneTerran wrote:On November 07 2012 14:02 TheNikeYork wrote:On November 07 2012 14:00 Aezur wrote:On November 07 2012 13:58 Medrea wrote:On November 07 2012 13:57 Aezur wrote:On November 07 2012 13:55 Probe1 wrote: [quote] It isn't your opinions. It is your uncivil method of expressing them. Except the concentration camp thing. Fuck off with that. Did I hit a nerve? You probably also think 9/11 was a conspiracy theory and the illuminati actually exists. Can I just think one of those? Illuminati did exist at one point in time. You can think whatever you want. I just don't understand why people wanted romney to win in the first place. He's made so many mistakes and everyone just goes along with it. He openly said he was against gay marriage, and the only reason he ever said he didn't want the sopa is because that's what people wanted to hear from him. He even just got indicted because he got caught stealing money and putting it in an account in his wifes name or something. Is that really the kind of person you want running our country? I truthfully think we shouldn't let the homos get married. Glad Obama won. If you wanna marry your boyfriend, goto Canada. Good ol bigotry. I'm just posting my opinion, man. No need to start calling me a bigot. I don't like gays. Opinions man. You're opinion is bigoted, I'm just stating a fact. Saying you dislike a whole, enormous group of people because of something that has no effect on you is bigoted. You are factually a bigot. You're perfectly allowed to be a bigot, it's just obvious that it's bad because you don't want to be called one despite clearly stating you are. I am opinion are bigot? User was temp banned for this post. Combination of incomprehensible grammar and defending the indefensible. To be fair the guy who's post he quoted wasnt correct either, so he was making a post saying what he said.
|
LiamTheZerg was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-15 08:30:55 and had 396 posts.
Reason: I took a look at your mod history and this is an ongoing issue with you. You need to either learn how we post on tl or find another website.
On November 08 2012 04:01 LiamTheZerg wrote: Jesus the internet is full of fags, who knew every pot smoker also had a major in economics and agriculture? Shit
User was temp banned for this post. To be fair, a lot of armchair narconomists are in that thread thinking hemp is gonna revolutionize manufacturing.
|
On November 08 2012 06:33 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +LiamTheZerg was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-15 08:30:55 and had 396 posts.
Reason: I took a look at your mod history and this is an ongoing issue with you. You need to either learn how we post on tl or find another website. Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 04:01 LiamTheZerg wrote: Jesus the internet is full of fags, who knew every pot smoker also had a major in economics and agriculture? Shit
User was temp banned for this post. To be fair, a lot of armchair narconomists are in that thread thinking hemp is gonna revolutionize manufacturing.
After posting in that thread I already regret posting in that thread. Too many fools. Hitting unsubscribe like it was f5 on the election map yesterday.
|
On November 08 2012 06:33 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +LiamTheZerg was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-15 08:30:55 and had 396 posts.
Reason: I took a look at your mod history and this is an ongoing issue with you. You need to either learn how we post on tl or find another website. Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 04:01 LiamTheZerg wrote: Jesus the internet is full of fags, who knew every pot smoker also had a major in economics and agriculture? Shit
User was temp banned for this post. To be fair, a lot of armchair narconomists are in that thread thinking hemp is gonna revolutionize manufacturing.
LoL at the post. I used to always say that legalization (that I agree with, but no, I have not smoked pot since I was a frehsman in high school...) will be the worst thing for potheads. What will they talk about once it was legalized? =)
|
On November 08 2012 06:33 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +LiamTheZerg was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-15 08:30:55 and had 396 posts.
Reason: I took a look at your mod history and this is an ongoing issue with you. You need to either learn how we post on tl or find another website. Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 04:01 LiamTheZerg wrote: Jesus the internet is full of fags, who knew every pot smoker also had a major in economics and agriculture? Shit
User was temp banned for this post. To be fair, a lot of armchair narconomists are in that thread thinking hemp is gonna revolutionize manufacturing. Yeah I agree with his point, his wording wasn't the best though
|
On November 08 2012 06:37 TheAmazombie wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 06:33 bonifaceviii wrote:LiamTheZerg was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-15 08:30:55 and had 396 posts.
Reason: I took a look at your mod history and this is an ongoing issue with you. You need to either learn how we post on tl or find another website. On November 08 2012 04:01 LiamTheZerg wrote: Jesus the internet is full of fags, who knew every pot smoker also had a major in economics and agriculture? Shit
User was temp banned for this post. To be fair, a lot of armchair narconomists are in that thread thinking hemp is gonna revolutionize manufacturing. LoL at the post. I used to always say that legalization (that I agree with, but no, I have not smoked pot since I was a frehsman in high school...) will be the worst thing for potheads. What will they talk about once it was legalized? =)
They'll talk about how high they are. That is how it worked in high school at least.
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
No lies, but you guys in here are real quick to judge and real quick to lynch people without a lick of evidence or any inside knowledge about the situation. Just what I picked up from reading this thread after I got banned and the pages full of shit that you guys manage to post. You guys should just stick to posting the funny ban comments and laughing over it instead of actually trying to rationalize bans and whatnot.
|
On November 08 2012 06:50 Roffles wrote: No lies, but you guys in here are real quick to judge and real quick to lynch people without a lick of evidence or any inside knowledge about the situation. Just what I picked up from reading this thread after I got banned and the pages full of shit that you guys manage to post. You guys should just stick to posting the funny ban comments and laughing over it instead of actually trying to rationalize bans and whatnot.
But...lynching is fun
|
On November 08 2012 06:50 Roffles wrote: No lies, but you guys in here are real quick to judge and real quick to lynch people without a lick of evidence or any inside knowledge about the situation. Just what I picked up from reading this thread after I got banned and the pages full of shit that you guys manage to post. You guys should just stick to posting the funny ban comments and laughing over it instead of actually trying to rationalize bans and whatnot. lol. technically, you were already judged and lynched when we started the started the conversation. was interesting to learn about tlms though.
context:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95875¤tpage=1436#28710
|
On November 08 2012 06:56 kollin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 06:50 Roffles wrote: No lies, but you guys in here are real quick to judge and real quick to lynch people without a lick of evidence or any inside knowledge about the situation. Just what I picked up from reading this thread after I got banned and the pages full of shit that you guys manage to post. You guys should just stick to posting the funny ban comments and laughing over it instead of actually trying to rationalize bans and whatnot. But...lynching is fun data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
Indeed! If you don't want to be the source of unwanted attention, don't give a mod a reason to ban you!
|
On November 08 2012 06:50 Roffles wrote: No lies, but you guys in here are real quick to judge and real quick to lynch people without a lick of evidence or any inside knowledge about the situation. Just what I picked up from reading this thread after I got banned and the pages full of shit that you guys manage to post. You guys should just stick to posting the funny ban comments and laughing over it instead of actually trying to rationalize bans and whatnot. lol when I was banned for a few hours a few people I had never seen post before showed up to say I was shit. It's what this thread is. It's exactly what this thread is and always has been and always will be. If you ever want to hold a popularity contest with a subsection of TL, ban the contestant.
|
On November 08 2012 07:31 Probe1 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 06:50 Roffles wrote: No lies, but you guys in here are real quick to judge and real quick to lynch people without a lick of evidence or any inside knowledge about the situation. Just what I picked up from reading this thread after I got banned and the pages full of shit that you guys manage to post. You guys should just stick to posting the funny ban comments and laughing over it instead of actually trying to rationalize bans and whatnot. lol when I was banned for a few hours a lot of people I had never seen post before showed up to say I was shit. It's what this thread is. It's exactly what this thread is and always has been and always will be. If you ever want to hold a popularity contest with a subsection of TL, ban the contestant. Nope, I firmly believe its witchhunt side his recent.
|
Been this way since I registered. Maybe it's worse now and I can't tell but it seems no different, just new faces.
On October 09 2012 05:57 Probe1 wrote: Roffles is a straight up OG you can't keep him down.
Actually I take back part of what I just said. I've actually been a vindictive little shit in this thread before. I've erased a few comments after posting them then realize that I was being a dipshit. So maybe this thread is more judgemental now. But I've made my own mistakes in years past. Maybe I'm projecting my own struggle against schadenfreude onto the entire thread
|
Anyone else think schadenfreude is an incredibly sexy word?
|
United States5162 Posts
On November 08 2012 07:57 Azera wrote: Anyone else think schadenfreude is an incredibly sexy word? Yes, it's one of my favorites.
|
|
|
|