|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On October 30 2012 01:17 cLAN.Anax wrote:I'm gone for two days, on a weekend no less, and there's only 46 new posts here? ABL, I am disappoint. 
On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote:
Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post.
Cokefreak was just temp banned for 2 days by Excalibur_Z.
That account was created on 2011-06-05 05:53:54 and had 2472 posts.
Reason: "I am disappoint" is a terrible meme.
Don't go there.
|
On October 30 2012 02:20 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2012 01:17 cLAN.Anax wrote:I'm gone for two days, on a weekend no less, and there's only 46 new posts here? ABL, I am disappoint. Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote:
Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +Cokefreak was just temp banned for 2 days by Excalibur_Z.
That account was created on 2011-06-05 05:53:54 and had 2472 posts.
Reason: "I am disappoint" is a terrible meme. Don't go there.
That ban reason may actually be the best thing I've ever seen. Ever.
|
On October 30 2012 02:20 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2012 01:17 cLAN.Anax wrote:I'm gone for two days, on a weekend no less, and there's only 46 new posts here? ABL, I am disappoint. Show nested quote +On June 12 2012 02:48 Cokefreak wrote:On June 12 2012 02:45 TheToast wrote:
Anyone else notice that there was like 60% less bans this MLG than previous ones? Yep, I am disappoint. User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +Cokefreak was just temp banned for 2 days by Excalibur_Z.
That account was created on 2011-06-05 05:53:54 and had 2472 posts.
Reason: "I am disappoint" is a terrible meme. Don't go there.
Oh god that time ~___~
|
Sovern was just temp banned for 30 days by Liquid`Nazgul. That account was created on 2011-03-17 07:19:54 and had 312 posts. Reason: + Show Spoiler +Another free ticket not to play an amazing player such as Sjow. I hope that SC2 continues to die as the competitive scene is being overthrown by DOTA and LoL each and every day. Such a a shitty imbalanced game and people pour thousands of hours into the game yet they still get treated like a Chinese Sweat shop worker because they made a mistake like any human would. Sjow should switch ti DOTA, fuck SC2. Multiple and warnings, trying to dodge by creating new accounts. Given how you think of SC2 maybe it would be better for you not to be here? Either way if you do like it here I would ask you to greatly adjust your attitude, because next ban is going to be your last.
Nazghoul laying down the law. Sovern was definitely captain negative for Halloween.
|
Swazi Spring was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2012-09-26 03:16:00 and had 414 posts.
Reason: 3) Keep the thread on topic. This is about Obama vs Romney in the US Presidential Election. Please avoid talking about people who will not be on the ballot in November. Talk about these people elsewhere
Also stop trolling.
On October 30 2012 03:21 Swazi Spring wrote:
As we all know, Romney has been absolutely destroying Obama in all of the polls for the past month. However, just two months ago, President Kardashian was actually in the lead. When President Kardashian was in the lead, it was revealed that Democrats were being oversampled by a wide-margin.
Democrats tried frantically to say that it didn't matter and that Democrats were only being oversampled, because Obama was up in the polls and so more people associated themselves with the Democratic Party. Yet, Romney is now dominating in the polls by a wide margin and yet Democrats are STILL being oversampled. If the Democratic Party's excuse for being oversampled is true, then this would not be the case.
Anyone care to elaborate on this?
User was temp banned for this post.
First post back from Disneyland.
GETS BANNED
I laughed so hard.
|
LOOOOL! Poor Swazi. He just can't help himself. I don't get the President Kardashian reference. Implying celebrity?
|
On October 30 2012 03:40 jdseemoreglass wrote:
LOOOOL! Poor Swazi. He just can't help himself. I don't get the President Kardashian reference. Implying celebrity?
Yeah, its straight from Limbaugh's mouth, so you'd probably have to listen to some of his shows to get the meat of it, though I think you've already got the gist.
There is nothing more irritating in an online discussion than someone who consistently wants to play "pretend". By that I mean come to table without even an acknowledgement of an opposing validity, as though pretending that those who disagree with you are necessarily delusional is the only way to argue.
|
On October 30 2012 03:46 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2012 03:40 jdseemoreglass wrote:
LOOOOL! Poor Swazi. He just can't help himself. I don't get the President Kardashian reference. Implying celebrity? Yeah, its straight from Limbaugh's mouth, so you'd probably have to listen to some of his shows to get the meat of it, though I think you've already got the gist. There is nothing more irritating in an online discussion than someone who consistently wants to play "pretend". By that I mean come to table without even an acknowledgement of an opposing validity, as though pretending that those who disagree with you are necessarily delusional is the only way to argue.
I thought that's what both sides of the aisle did when arguing their politics oO
lol'd at the image post guy. pretty funny stuff
|
On October 29 2012 22:30 Sinensis wrote:
This is where we discuss stuff like this right?
No, this is where we mock stuff like that. Substantive discussion is reserved for the website feedback forum.
|
On October 30 2012 03:36 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +Swazi Spring was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2012-09-26 03:16:00 and had 414 posts.
Reason: 3) Keep the thread on topic. This is about Obama vs Romney in the US Presidential Election. Please avoid talking about people who will not be on the ballot in November. Talk about these people elsewhere
Also stop trolling. Show nested quote +On October 30 2012 03:21 Swazi Spring wrote:
As we all know, Romney has been absolutely destroying Obama in all of the polls for the past month. However, just two months ago, President Kardashian was actually in the lead. When President Kardashian was in the lead, it was revealed that Democrats were being oversampled by a wide-margin.
Democrats tried frantically to say that it didn't matter and that Democrats were only being oversampled, because Obama was up in the polls and so more people associated themselves with the Democratic Party. Yet, Romney is now dominating in the polls by a wide margin and yet Democrats are STILL being oversampled. If the Democratic Party's excuse for being oversampled is true, then this would not be the case.
Anyone care to elaborate on this?
User was temp banned for this post. First post back from Disneyland. GETS BANNED I laughed so hard.
Rofl I pretty much called it the first time he got banned, he'll be back after the election, thank god, we won't have to deal with him.
|
On October 30 2012 05:04 Lmui wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2012 03:36 ticklishmusic wrote:Swazi Spring was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK.
That account was created on 2012-09-26 03:16:00 and had 414 posts.
Reason: 3) Keep the thread on topic. This is about Obama vs Romney in the US Presidential Election. Please avoid talking about people who will not be on the ballot in November. Talk about these people elsewhere
Also stop trolling. On October 30 2012 03:21 Swazi Spring wrote:
As we all know, Romney has been absolutely destroying Obama in all of the polls for the past month. However, just two months ago, President Kardashian was actually in the lead. When President Kardashian was in the lead, it was revealed that Democrats were being oversampled by a wide-margin.
Democrats tried frantically to say that it didn't matter and that Democrats were only being oversampled, because Obama was up in the polls and so more people associated themselves with the Democratic Party. Yet, Romney is now dominating in the polls by a wide margin and yet Democrats are STILL being oversampled. If the Democratic Party's excuse for being oversampled is true, then this would not be the case.
Anyone care to elaborate on this?
User was temp banned for this post. First post back from Disneyland. GETS BANNED I laughed so hard. Rofl I pretty much called it the first time he got banned, he'll be back after the election, thank god, we won't have to deal with him.
Oh, you think the political stuff will calm down immediately after the election? I'm a bit of a realist. I figure it stays absurd at LEAST until February. A little while past the inauguration, people will be screaming less.
|
Swazi Spring was just temp banned for 30 days by R1CH.
That account was created on 2012-09-26 03:16:00 and had 414 posts.
Reason: Spamming staff via PM.
Few occasions merit this amount of celebration but
FOR GREAT JUSTICE!
|
On October 30 2012 07:51 Praetorial wrote:Show nested quote +
Swazi Spring was just temp banned for 30 days by R1CH.
That account was created on 2012-09-26 03:16:00 and had 414 posts.
Reason: Spamming staff via PM.
Few occasions merit this amount of celebration but FOR GREAT JUSTICE!
For great justice indeed.
Stay shady in sandy Prae!
|
On October 30 2012 07:51 Praetorial wrote:Show nested quote +
Swazi Spring was just temp banned for 30 days by R1CH.
That account was created on 2012-09-26 03:16:00 and had 414 posts.
Reason: Spamming staff via PM.
Few occasions merit this amount of celebration but FOR GREAT JUSTICE!
Whoever received these PM's ought to comment on the possible hilarity of their no doubt rage-filled content.
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
The PM was perfectly reasonable but he sent it to, like, every staff member.
|
On October 30 2012 08:13 motbob wrote:
The PM was perfectly reasonable but he sent it to, like, every staff member.
Which PM? plz motbob!
|
*facepalm* Oh Swazi....
Gotta wonder why he had to send such a (assuming) reasonable PM to all the staff. Was he that afraid that any one of the recipients wouldn't receive it?
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On October 30 2012 08:20 Praetorial wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2012 08:13 motbob wrote:
The PM was perfectly reasonable but he sent it to, like, every staff member. Which PM? plz motbob!
Not only would posting the PM be a violation of a reasonably expected privacy, but it would also be disappointing to read (it's quite tame/boring).
|
Motbob you're a huge faggot and I hope you go to prison and get raped repeatedly up your ass and killed off when your used up ass can no longer be sold for cigarettes to the homies on cellblock.
User was banned for this post.
|
your Country52798 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
