|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On June 14 2012 09:50 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... It's actually pretty hard to get into bannable turf in a PM, as I understand it. Harassment or threats, as a general rule, afaik. edit. nm
|
On June 14 2012 09:53 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 09:50 JingleHell wrote:On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... It's actually pretty hard to get into bannable turf in a PM, as I understand it. Harassment or threats, as a general rule, afaik. Edited out
Nah, hamsters is the way to go.
Edit: This post was made pre-edit and has been cut down and edited to make sense to those who saw it pre-edit whilst respecting dAPhREAk's edit out.
|
United States8476 Posts
On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... There's currently 17 active reports that haven't been looked at yet. Most mods go into the reports and selectively pick out a few reports to do. Then we wait for a "sweeper" like GMarshal or heyoka for when they get absurdly high. Most I've ever seen was around 35 I think.
Edit: Fun fact: GMarshal has handled 80% of the reports in the past week with 467. Next highest is 43.
|
On June 14 2012 10:43 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... There's currently 17 active reports that haven't been looked at yet. Most mods go into the reports and selectively pick out a few reports to do. Then we wait for a "sweeper" like GMarshal or heyoka for when they get absurdly high. Most I've ever seen was around 35 I think. Edit: Fun fact: GMarshal has handled 80% of the reports in the past week with 467. Next highest is 43.
Fun fact: You still haven't given us the URL to check that.
<3
|
On June 14 2012 10:43 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... There's currently 17 active reports that haven't been looked at yet. Most mods go into the reports and selectively pick out a few reports to do. Then we wait for a "sweeper" like GMarshal or heyoka for when they get absurdly high. Most I've ever seen was around 35 I think. Edit: Fun fact: GMarshal has handled 80% of the reports in the past week with 467. Next highest is 43. interesting. you always give us the inside scoop. =)
|
Whoa, that's pretty cool. A little peek into how the moderation tends to work and into moderation patterns 
@daphreak: same frequency lolol
|
United States8476 Posts
On June 14 2012 10:46 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 10:43 NrGmonk wrote:On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... There's currently 17 active reports that haven't been looked at yet. Most mods go into the reports and selectively pick out a few reports to do. Then we wait for a "sweeper" like GMarshal or heyoka for when they get absurdly high. Most I've ever seen was around 35 I think. Edit: Fun fact: GMarshal has handled 80% of the reports in the past week with 467. Next highest is 43. Fun fact: You still haven't given us the URL to check that. <3 That's cause you haven't found it yet yourselves.
|
On June 14 2012 11:06 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 10:46 JingleHell wrote:On June 14 2012 10:43 NrGmonk wrote:On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... There's currently 17 active reports that haven't been looked at yet. Most mods go into the reports and selectively pick out a few reports to do. Then we wait for a "sweeper" like GMarshal or heyoka for when they get absurdly high. Most I've ever seen was around 35 I think. Edit: Fun fact: GMarshal has handled 80% of the reports in the past week with 467. Next highest is 43. Fun fact: You still haven't given us the URL to check that. <3 That's cause you haven't found it yet yourselves. Old TLPD Future TL Know-How section I went through the forum numbers from 1-100 to find where it might be. I'm guessing it's pretty close to EUFA Euro 2012 if it somehow is in a forum, because that was created very recently. I found some curious forums along the way... but didn't find any open forums with the ranking yet. Judging from this, I am thinking that it is not in an actual forum, but some other part of the website. That means we probably can't use the date it was created or anything to find it, unfortunately, nor can we find the post from the posts of the poster, which is likely an admin or tl.net bot.
Also, none of nrgmonk's recent posts are in anything resembling a leaderboard. Monk, are you sure that it is in a forum that we can see? Are you trolling us? Would you be willing to give us a hint in exchange for bans or hamsters? I'm sure we can reach a compromise here, young sire.
|
TL detective work at its finest, so legit. I am fully behind chocolate and am closely following all developments >:D
Mods just might not be happy with normal users being able to see the forum, though, so it would be perfectly understandable if such a forum/thread existed and they don't want to have it open for all to see.
|
United States8476 Posts
Ok, hint #2. It's not part of a thread/in a forum. Although I don't understand if hypothetically it were in a forum, why I would necessarily have posted in it.
And to reiterate: I'm sure the public can see it if you just know the url.
|
On June 14 2012 11:57 NrGmonk wrote: Ok, hint #2. It's not part of a thread/in a forum. Although I don't understand if hypothetically it were in a forum, why I would necessarily have posted in it.
And to reiterate: I'm sure the public can see it if you just know the url. Well, I checked gmarshal, too. Since both of you are active mods that take an interest in banning and the ABL, I would figure that one of you would have a post in it or something.
On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? Oh. I was thinking they would want to post in it to comment or whatever
|
Hyrule19053 Posts
On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... No action on it yet. Give me $20 and I'll let you know when action comes of it
|
I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular?
|
United States8476 Posts
On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? I get what he's trying to say now. It makes sense.
Hint #3: The url contains every vowel.
|
On June 14 2012 12:10 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? I get what he's trying to say now. It makes sense. Hint #3: The url contains every vowel. I bet it has either automated, moderation, or a variant of one of the two in it as a result. Both have every vowel except for one. It's really repetitive to just type in www.teamliquid.net and guess www.teamliquid.net/automatedmoderationleaderboard or something similar until I get it right, so do you know of a different way that we could find it?
Nice point heh. Curse NrgMonk and his trickery!
|
On June 14 2012 12:10 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? I get what he's trying to say now. It makes sense. Hint #3: The url contains every vowel. "http://www.teamliquid.net/forum" contains every vowel.
|
On June 14 2012 12:10 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? I get what he's trying to say now. It makes sense. Hint #3: The url contains every vowel. Are we playing CLUE now?
|
United States8476 Posts
On June 14 2012 12:14 Heh_ wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 12:10 NrGmonk wrote:On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? I get what he's trying to say now. It makes sense. Hint #3: The url contains every vowel. "http://www.teamliquid.net/forum" contains every vowel. I already said it's not part of a forum.
On June 14 2012 12:14 Chocolate wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 12:10 NrGmonk wrote:On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? I get what he's trying to say now. It makes sense. Hint #3: The url contains every vowel. I get it has either automated, moderation, or a variant of one of the two in it as a result. Both have every vowel except for one. It's really repetitive to just type in www.teamliquid.net and guess www.teamliquid.net/automatedmoderationleaderboard or something similar until I get it right, so do you know of a different way that we could find it? Hint #4: This is correct: "I get it has either automated, moderation, or a variant of one of the two in it as a result."
Hint #5: As of now, I don't believe there's a way to somehow find the page without directly typing in the url for a normal person. It is, however, linked somewhere in the staff forums, which you can't see.
|
On June 14 2012 12:10 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 12:03 Aerisky wrote: I think what he's saying is that the leaderboards could just be updated by a bot or automatically etc, he wouldn't necessarily have to post in it to say anything in particular? I get what he's trying to say now. It makes sense. Hint #3: The url contains every vowel. does that include those in teamliquid.net?
|
On June 14 2012 12:02 tofucake wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2012 09:26 dAPhREAk wrote:SmokeMonster was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-06-10 15:34:53 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Not an an acceptable post. well, now i know my report button works (or GMarshal is monitoring the thread). i wonder why the pm i reported didn't result in a ban.... hmmmm.... No action on it yet. Give me $20 and I'll let you know when action comes of it he can totally afford it a) lawyer b) in japan c) has woman and isn't poor
squeeze!
|
|
|
|