EPTWe're Getting A New Server! - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Community |
|
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42400 Posts
| ||
|
RHoudini
Belgium3627 Posts
Hmm, that's slightly outdated. If you're building a new server for the next 5 years, why not use the latest hardware (v4 Xeons)? | ||
|
Poly_Optimize
Canada156 Posts
On March 21 2017 07:13 R1CH wrote: <h2>Our last major upgrade was in 2010 when I started working for TL full time right as the SC2 traffic was starting to ramp up. Are you preparing for the traffic that will generate BW remastered? Good job and thanks for continuously improving the sites/servers. | ||
|
Libe91
France16 Posts
| ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
On March 21 2017 21:15 RHoudini wrote: 2x Xeon E5-2690v3 @ 2.60 GHz Hmm, that's slightly outdated. If you're building a new server for the next 5 years, why not use the latest hardware (v4 Xeons)? We don't have much option here, generally dedicated server providers don't offer the latest hardware until it's already several years old due to compatibility and price. In any case, the performance difference between them for single thread workloads (mostly what we have) actually favors the v3 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2364&cmp[]=2780). | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
On March 21 2017 15:12 peanuts wrote: Could you explain why you decided to choose OVH? Cheapest by far, good hardware, decent network. | ||
|
RHoudini
Belgium3627 Posts
On March 21 2017 23:42 R1CH wrote: We don't have much option here, generally dedicated server providers don't offer the latest hardware until it's already several years old due to compatibility and price. In any case, the performance difference between them for single thread workloads (mostly what we have) actually favors the v3 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2364&cmp[]=2780). At the same price level a 14-core 2690 v4 should definitely be a better choice than a 12-core 2690 v3. v4 Xeons are marginally faster than v3 at the same clock speed, consume less and have more cores at the same price level. v4 also support higher-clocked memory (2400 MHz vs 2133 MHz). But of course the differences are marginal compared with the giant leap from the current server. Good luck with the migration! | ||
|
MrMischelito
347 Posts
On March 21 2017 07:13 R1CH wrote: ... the new server backs up to a different continent entirely... so when the whole of North America is going down all 2012-style, at least we're sure our precious TL post history is saved  | ||
|
MrMischelito
347 Posts
On March 21 2017 22:41 Poly_Optimize wrote: Are you preparing for the traffic that will generate BW remastered? Good job and thanks for continuously improving the sites/servers. you'd better be ready for that, when all the newcomers (or returners) come hitting the TL strategy forums and BW Liquipedia | ||
|
Hushfieldx
Belgium64 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
| ||
|
DrDevice
Canada132 Posts
| ||
|
Sharkken
Jordan141 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
Also damn, that RAM | ||
|
BlueStar
Bulgaria1171 Posts
We are in 2017 | ||
FO-nTTaX
Johto4983 Posts
On March 23 2017 19:19 BlueStar wrote: A question - are you going to get a https version of the site finally? We are in 2017 Ad networks unfortunately are still in the 90s  | ||
|
Gamerhcp
734 Posts
| ||
Ares[Effort]
DEMACIA6550 Posts
| ||
| ||
