Good as new. Thanks R1CH!
Ask TL Staff Anything - Page 788
Forum Index > TL Community |
Please, if you are not staff, don't answer questions in this thread, even if you think you know the answer. Also, please take complains about bans, question about TL as a site, etc to the Website Feedback Forum. | ||
Harris1st
Germany6756 Posts
Good as new. Thanks R1CH! | ||
robih
Austria1085 Posts
seems to be working again, thank you! | ||
bela.mervado
Hungary372 Posts
wanted to ask for a week long ban for a good measure when a bot bumped the thread, got a warn in the meantime, rightfully. | ||
ComaDose
Canada10352 Posts
we got core impact imagine if we had jensen ... i was so mad the first time we let impact leave... ... if he ever sees this i hope he knows i love him | ||
ComaDose
Canada10352 Posts
| ||
FinsT
32 Posts
I recently joined the forum, i've read the rules, and i need moderator's help (advice) about one: "Duplicate or excessively repeated submissions in one or more areas". Thing is, i'm not sure: would it be "excessively repeated submissions" if i'd add a post to this topic for every campaign completed of my "quest" playthrough of Starcrafts' campaigns, to report results and notify about playthrough's playlist being updated? And in general: what exactly is "excessively repeated submissions": does it mean same content posted multiple times only, or does it also mean different content posted as multiple subsequent posts (a.k.a. "double posting")? P.S. Don't want to break no rules here, so just have to ask this one, yep. %) | ||
![]()
tofucake
Hyrule18989 Posts
Generally we allow multi posting in situations like yours where you're adding new content or in LR threads and the like. Just try not to go overboard | ||
FinsT
32 Posts
On March 31 2024 03:38 tofucake wrote: We generally mean not posting a whole bunch of threads about the same thing, and when replying to multiple people use one post for all of them rather than 1 each. Generally we allow multi posting in situations like yours where you're adding new content or in LR threads and the like. Just try not to go overboard Got it. Thanks! Roger-that to try to not go overboard, too. Already reviewed the topic and put as much as i deemed appropriate under spoiler tags. Wanna make it good. ![]() | ||
marleytae6
2 Posts
| ||
robih
Austria1085 Posts
e.g. Copenhagen Major EU RMRs, IEM Katowice, Blast Spring Showdown, Blast Spring Groups | ||
Hector2
1 Post
It seems you cant open any thread nowadays without getting banned, for the most random of reasons ... I know the world has changed a lot but talk about a sure way to kill engagement. No wonder when i post something it takes ages for people to reply. No one wants to say anything User was banned for this post. | ||
![]()
tofucake
Hyrule18989 Posts
Have you tried posting better? Maybe people just don't like your posts or have anything of value to add. | ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
![]() | ||
ComaDose
Canada10352 Posts
| ||
ComaDose
Canada10352 Posts
On April 26 2024 19:55 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: Hello for some reason when i try to edit my afreeca stream in the stream management section it shows this msg. Can someone help please ? ![]() how was used to do it was here https://tl.net/forum/website-feedback/281401-featured-streamer-list not sure how long https://tl.net/forum/profile.php?user=Heyoka hasnt been doing it but if you bother him dont tell him it was me. | ||
![]()
Peeano
Netherlands4724 Posts
On June 07 2024 08:42 ComaDose wrote: how often do you change your quote? Never. Like yours, while not as funny, it is a reminder to something i hold dear: history/nostalgia. Savior got owned and ridiculed when he was likely already enaging in bad boy activities, and the epic Flash vs FBH TvTs in proleague. Now if only FBH was more interested to still play competitively... I'm convincined he has the qualities to (still) be a top 3 Terran, but I still respect him choosing not to. | ||
![]()
FlaShFTW
United States10081 Posts
On June 07 2024 17:10 Peeano wrote: Never. Like yours, while not as funny, it is a reminder to something i hold dear: history/nostalgia. Savior got owned and ridiculed when he was likely already enaging in bad boy activities, and the epic Flash vs FBH TvTs in proleague. Now if only FBH was more interested to still play competitively... I'm convincined he has the qualities to (still) be a top 3 Terran, but I still respect him choosing not to. FBH top 3 Terran? Delusional hehe | ||
ComaDose
Canada10352 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10101 Posts
His TvT and TvZ were really good at his peak. He just had that typical TvP weakness. So, yea, I feel like you have to have all 3 MUs to a high level to be considered a top Terran, but I think he was close to being in the conversation for top 3 Terran in his peak. That first TvZ against Savior on Python with BCs is a timeless classic too, IMO. Literally first official pro game between them and my mans swags out here. I know that you personally need no introduction but in case any of the newer users here have not seen it: + Show Spoiler [VOD] + On June 07 2024 17:10 Peeano wrote: Never. Like yours, while not as funny, it is a reminder to something i hold dear: history/nostalgia. Savior got owned and ridiculed when he was likely already enaging in bad boy activities, and the epic Flash vs FBH TvTs in proleague. Now if only FBH was more interested to still play competitively... I'm convincined he has the qualities to (still) be a top 3 Terran, but I still respect him choosing not to. Pretty sure the aforementioned series was well before any definitive matchfixing shit. In fact I think I remember a narrative going around that series like that one are what pushed Savior closer to greed in the twilight of his career, but admittedly I believe that was just rumors and hearsay. LMK if I'm off-base! | ||
![]()
Peeano
Netherlands4724 Posts
The FBH vs Savior thing I should have phrased a little better. I wasn't implying Savior threw that match, merely saying it could have been thrown. Which ever is the case I LOVE that game and it feels mighty awesome that Savior got ridiculed in person as well after the game, knowing what we know now. | ||
| ||