EPTOn February 19 2019 01:27 CynicalDeath wrote:
something tells me msrm won't get out of the groups stage
something tells me msrm won't get out of the groups stage
Tell you a lot about balance right now that we even considering this possibility
WESG 2018 Grand Final Groups - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Nakajin
Canada8991 Posts
Tell you a lot about balance right now that we even considering this possibility | ||
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
| ||
|
Legan
Finland614 Posts
| ||
digmouse
China6333 Posts
On February 19 2019 01:31 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Well at least we now know that Wesg absolutely doesn't rig their groups. WESG's tournament director: "I immediately regret that after drawing group A". True story. | ||
|
Toua
Denmark318 Posts
On February 19 2019 02:36 digmouse wrote: WESG's tournament director: "I immediately regret that after drawing group A". True story. Does that mean it was a random draw?, cause I dont get how these groups were created | ||
|
Solar424
United States4001 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
If I was a group A player I'd be livid | ||
|
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
| ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
 | ||
|
Xamo
Spain886 Posts
Even Serral has to be unhappy, there is always a chance he has a bad day. | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
| ||
|
argonautdice
Canada2722 Posts
On February 19 2019 04:56 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: The joys of random seeding lmao. If I was a group A player I'd be livid If Scarlett was a group A player you'd be livid. Also technically seeding is "rigging the bracket"  | ||
|
mierin
United States4945 Posts
On February 19 2019 09:36 argonautdice wrote: If Scarlett was a group A player you'd be livid. Also technically seeding is "rigging the bracket" Haha, I remember that whole rigging the groups debacle a while back. Some people are determined to be unhappy, regardless of what actually happens. | ||
|
Carminedust
487 Posts
| ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/0hJt4wd.png) seedings completly out of my brain, swapped around 1-2 ppl within 1-2 ranks to get at least 1 per race in each group. not so hard to get fair and balanced... | ||
Waxangel
United States33713 Posts
On February 19 2019 10:28 KalWarkov wrote: seedings completly out of my brain, swapped around 1-2 ppl within 1-2 ranks to get at least 1 per race in each group. not so hard to get fair and balanced... ...you understand that the "completely out of my brain" part completely invalidates the seeding? Why not just arbitrarily place people into groups without the seeding entirely  (that's EFFECTIVELY what you did) | ||
|
fronkschnonk
Germany622 Posts
On February 19 2019 11:23 Waxangel wrote: ...you understand that the "completely out of my brain" part completely invalidates the seeding? Why not just arbitrarily place people into groups without the seeding entirely (that's EFFECTIVELY what you did)Well, the approach isn't that bad at all. But one would have to refer to a at least somewhat more official ranking. This could be easily done by using aligulac or WCS points. Also it would be more clever to classify players in skill squads (8 players in skill squad A, 8 players in skill squad B and so on) and then seed players of each skill squad into the groups randomly. You wouldn't get in arbitrary "this player could be slightly better than that player, but I'm not quite sure"-situations as much. | ||
|
Rodya
546 Posts
| ||
|
Harris1st
Germany7450 Posts
| ||
|
Nakajin
Canada8991 Posts
On February 19 2019 20:11 Rodya wrote: Aligulac and WCS points are both bad metrics. You might disagree, but it is not an objective matter like you think it is. Well it's still the best we have, unless we go full subjective, it's better to have a metric that can favor foreigner or Koreans a bit than to decide we are the god of Starcraft and that actually Stats losing in the round of 32 dosen't count or things like that. | ||
| ||
