[Interview] Lambo isn't afraid to call it how he sees it -…
| Forum Index > SC2 General | 
| 
	 
							Kikirik1
							
							
						 
						
						45 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							Ej_
							
							
						 
						
						47656 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 19:01 BonitiilloO wrote: i been out of the scene for a while but from where this player come from? this is the first time i hear his name. Germany.  | ||
| 
	 
							Charoisaur
							
							
						 
						
						Germany16005 Posts
						 
					The personality that pleases everyone doesn't exist  | ||
| 
	 
							The Taxman
							
							
						 
						
						37 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							deacon.frost
							
							
						 
						
						Czech Republic12129 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 20:51 Charoisaur wrote: either players are faceless robots or arrogant jerks. The personality that pleases everyone doesn't exist Or they can be the Sun god himself, Taeja   Everybody loves Taeja ![]() Generally speaking it helps if you can support your banter. When MC was shittalking he was amongst the best players(even when he was bantering in WCS he was the beast of WCS). Or Parting, Dark, w/e. If these words were spoken by Serral who has results, it would be a little bit different. IMO   I don't mind this, at least now maybe Koreans will hear his name and do a preparation so they won't be surprised as they were with Serral ![]() Edit> outside of me feeling it's a little bit forced(and that's maybe a language barrier as Lambo is German, I am Czech and the interview is in English  ), I actually like him being a little bit cocky. At least someone a little bit refreshing. | ||
| 
	 
							TheOneAboveU
							
							
						 
						
						Germany3367 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 23:17 deacon.frost wrote: Or they can be the Sun god himself, Taeja   Everybody loves Taeja ![]() Generally speaking it helps if you can support your banter. When MC was shittalking he was amongst the best players(even when he was bantering in WCS he was the beast of WCS). Or Parting, Dark, w/e. If these words were spoken by Serral who has results, it would be a little bit different. IMO   I don't mind this, at least now maybe Koreans will hear his name and do a preparation so they won't be surprised as they were with Serral ![]() Edit> outside of me feeling it's a little bit forced(and that's maybe a language barrier as Lambo is German, I am Czech and the interview is in English  ), I actually like him being a little bit cocky. At least someone a little bit refreshing.Germans tend to not sugar coat stuff. We mostly simply say the things as we honestly see them, direct and blunt. People from other cultures often find that rude, or in this case, arrogant, so there may be some of that impression here. Personally I hope Lambo can deliver good games at BlizzCon, even if he's fighting quite the up hill battle!  | ||
| 
	 
							hexhaven
							
							
						 
						
						Finland940 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 05:51 FrkFrJss wrote: The minimum number of games you will play in the group stage 4, and the max is 9. In old blizzcon, the minimum number of games you could play in the ro16 was 3 and max 5. So, really, players now play more games than they did in the old Blizzcon. Now, if they were to change the games to bo5, then the minimum games you would play is 6 and max is 15. Changing the group stage to bo5 would somewhat cheapen the ro8 and ro4 since you only need to win one bo5 in each stage to advance to the next stage, whereas you needed two bo5s to even get to the ro8. As much as I would like to see bo5s, it would also massively extend the Blizzcon broadcasting days. They should absolutely change the format. Two BO3s to decide whether you're in or out in a game as volatile as SC2 is not fun for the viewers. A different format would reinforce the idea that this is the most important tournament of the year. And just run two streams.  | ||
| 
	 
							Geo.Rion
							
							
						 
						
						7377 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 23:34 hexhaven wrote: They should absolutely change the format. Two BO3s to decide whether you're in or out in a game as volatile as SC2 is not fun for the viewers. A different format would reinforce the idea that this is the most important tournament of the year. And just run two streams. agreed, but let s be real, they re not gonna change the format 1 week before the event  | ||
| 
	 
							hexhaven
							
							
						 
						
						Finland940 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 23:45 Geo.Rion wrote: agreed, but let s be real, they re not gonna change the format 1 week before the event Oh, I agree, just musings for next year. They have the perfect opportunity to shake things up after BlizzCon.  | ||
| 
	 
							FrkFrJss
							
							
						 
						
						Canada1205 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 23:34 hexhaven wrote: They should absolutely change the format. Two BO3s to decide whether you're in or out in a game as volatile as SC2 is not fun for the viewers. A different format would reinforce the idea that this is the most important tournament of the year. And just run two streams. Two bo3s is the same length if not longer than one bo5, three bo3s is always like longer than one bo5. People found the 2013-2015 Blizzcon formats plenty exciting. Besides, I think Blizzard goes out of its way to only have one stream so that they can highlight each person. It's a grand final, so every match deserves the main stage.  | ||
| 
	 
							Fango
							
							
						 
						
						United Kingdom8987 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 23:34 hexhaven wrote: They should absolutely change the format. Two BO3s to decide whether you're in or out in a game as volatile as SC2 is not fun for the viewers. A different format would reinforce the idea that this is the most important tournament of the year. And just run two streams. Blizzard want upsets, bo5s are less upset prone than bo3. Having decider/elimination matches be bo3 is stupid, but probably favourable for the TO.  | ||
| 
	 
							Ej_
							
							
						 
						
						47656 Posts
						 
					On October 17 2018 01:49 Fango wrote: Blizzard want upsets, bo5s are less upset prone than bo3. Source, please.  | ||
| 
	 
							_fool
							
							
						 
						
						Netherlands678 Posts
						 
					So, Lambo, bring it on!  | ||
| 
	 
							Brained
							
							
						 
						
						Germany58 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							Muraddin
							
							
						 
						
						Slovakia10 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							Fango
							
							
						 
						
						United Kingdom8987 Posts
						 
					On blizzard wanting upests or bo3s being more upset prone than bo5?  | ||
| 
	 
							starkiller123
							
							
						 
						
						United States4030 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							Poopi
							
							
						 
						
						France12904 Posts
						 
					Shit talking Has that much while he didn’t even get to see a wcs finals is ridiculous. Sure, MaNa and Has are not top tier usually, but they managed to be clutch at the right time and he should respect that.  | ||
| 
	 
							sugarmuffinpuff
							
							
						 
						
						Canada38 Posts
						 
					On October 16 2018 17:45 dummy1 wrote: kid maru.. come on bro. he neglected that he is kid "god" maru. It's very clearly sarcasm - more of an "FML" post than anything. He even said in this interview that he doesn't have much of a chance to win BlizzCon, he's most scared of Maru and TY, and Maru has the second highest chance to win. Does that sound like someone who's unironically calling maru "kid"? Also, the number of people becoming anti-fans of lambo is pretty funny. This is a community that's seen the likes of idra, naniwa, huk and stephano, but LAMBO is the poster child for cocky s***-talkers? Give the man a break, lol.  | ||
| 
	 
							DomeGetta
							
							
						 
						
						480 Posts
						 
					 | ||
  | ||
 Everybody loves Taeja 
), I actually like him being a little bit cocky. At least someone a little bit refreshing.