EPTBattle.net name to be phased out - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Kaz1
35 Posts
| ||
|
hansonslee
United States2027 Posts
For those who don't know, PoodleCorp has DDOS'd Blizzard servers twice and ransomed the servers for 2000 and 3000 retweets respectively. They are a notorious hacker group for hacking into big youtube channels and prominent gaming servers. They have just realized a threat to DDOS the upcoming Battlefield game. Just want to inform you guys as much as I can because people seem to be stuck in the nostalgia trip. | ||
|
Creager
Germany1877 Posts
On September 24 2016 03:15 hansonslee wrote: I think this might be somewhat related to the fucking PoodleCorp incident when they have constantly DDOS'd Blizzard servers. But please correct me, if I am wrong... For those who don't know, PoodleCorp has DDOS'd Blizzard servers twice and ransomed the servers for 2000 and 3000 retweets respectively. They are a notorious hacker group for hacking into big youtube channels and prominent gaming servers. They have just realized a threat to DDOS the upcoming Battlefield game. Just want to inform you guys as much as I can because people seem to be stuck in the nostalgia trip. Don't see what this has to do with a hacker group DDOS'ing Blizzard servers lol. It's highly unlikely they'll stop due to a name change of the service like "Shit, Battle.net is gone, where did it go?! What the fuck are we gonna DDOS now?!?!". | ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On September 24 2016 03:25 Creager wrote: Don't see what this has to do with a hacker group DDOS'ing Blizzard servers lol. It's highly unlikely they'll stop due to a name change of the service like "Shit, Battle.net is gone, where did it go?! What the fuck are we gonna DDOS now?!?!". lol same thought here. What does a name change have to do with this hacker group? :S | ||
|
Excludos
Norway7909 Posts
On September 24 2016 00:48 TT1 wrote: so battle net is turning into blizzard net, bnet nonetheless  I wish it was Blizzard.net, that would make half a sense. It's confirmed they're naming it "Blizzard Tech", which just sounds stupid and doesn't roll off the tongue at all. | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5078 Posts
Battle.net is a strong brand, there's no reason to abandon it for a new brand. | ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12224 Posts
| ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5078 Posts
On September 24 2016 05:12 Excalibur_Z wrote: It's not a new brand. Judging from the reaction it certainly is being taken that way. Consumer perception > all. | ||
|
Excalibur_Z
United States12224 Posts
On September 24 2016 05:14 DeepElemBlues wrote: Judging from the reaction it certainly is being taken that way. Consumer perception > all. Is "Blizzard Streaming" a new brand? Is "Blizzard Voice" a new brand? They're subsets of the Blizzard brand. The "Battle.net Desktop Agent" is now called the "Blizzard Launcher", and that's a prime example of how things will change moving forward. It's not the "Blizzard Tech Launcher" or anything like that. It's actually extremely straightforward and people are overthinking it. It's consumer confusion. | ||
|
Scrubwave
Poland1786 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On September 24 2016 03:15 hansonslee wrote: I think this might be somewhat related to the fucking PoodleCorp incident when they have constantly DDOS'd Blizzard servers. But please correct me, if I am wrong... For those who don't know, PoodleCorp has DDOS'd Blizzard servers twice and ransomed the servers for 2000 and 3000 retweets respectively. They are a notorious hacker group for hacking into big youtube channels and prominent gaming servers. They have just realized a threat to DDOS the upcoming Battlefield game. Just want to inform you guys as much as I can because people seem to be stuck in the nostalgia trip. People these days DDOS servers for... retweets? What? | ||
|
McRatyn
Poland901 Posts
Edit: Also in this iteration it doesn't seem to support the titles deemed as Classic on the Battle.net website (Starcraft 1, Diablo 2, WC3) so maybe that will change along with this. | ||
|
TT1
Canada9969 Posts
On September 24 2016 04:25 Excludos wrote: I wish it was Blizzard.net, that would make half a sense. It's confirmed they're naming it "Blizzard Tech", which just sounds stupid and doesn't roll off the tongue at all. BecH, fuck lets just call it Beck | ||
|
DuckloadBlackra
225 Posts
| ||
|
Pejota
Chile14 Posts
| ||
|
Dingodile
4131 Posts
| ||
|
Excludos
Norway7909 Posts
On September 25 2016 01:27 Dingodile wrote: I really hope the "new" Launcher faster than the current one. It takes more times than the game itself. It's only a name change you know  | ||
|
[F_]aths
Germany3947 Posts
Battle.Net is a name with such a depth and prominence, built since Diablo 2 was released. Battle.Net stands for countless hours of grinding but also for the highest peaks of e-sports. While admittedly slightly confusing in these days, Battle.Net has such recognition and reputation, I would not let this name go. | ||
|
Clbull
United Kingdom1439 Posts
Battle.net is a very strong and recognisable brand across the PC gaming community. It may have made sense back when RealID and the early launch of Wings of Liberty were tainting the brand that Battle.net 2.0 was built upon, but Battle.net 2.0 is almost as strong as its pre-WoW predecessor and we put the controversy that always-online DRM in Diablo III and the lack of LAN support in SC2 generated behind us long ago. | ||
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
| ||
| ||
