EPTBattle.net name to be phased out - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ioncreature
18 Posts
| ||
|
Creager
Germany1923 Posts
| ||
|
207aicila
1237 Posts
On September 22 2016 16:30 ndesktop wrote: I think "The Artist formerly known as Battle.net" would be a good name. Haha, shame no one got this reference. | ||
|
sparklyresidue
United States5523 Posts
| ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13990 Posts
| ||
|
404AlphaSquad
839 Posts
| ||
|
slit
Spain212 Posts
On September 22 2016 20:48 207aicila wrote: Haha, shame no one got this reference. Sign o' the times bro | ||
|
I wasbanned fromthis
113 Posts
*claps* | ||
|
Big-t
Austria1350 Posts
| ||
|
rotta
5598 Posts
On September 22 2016 20:48 207aicila wrote: Haha, shame no one got this reference. Nah, it just wasn't that funny. | ||
|
207aicila
1237 Posts
Everyone's a critic eh. | ||
|
DSK
England1110 Posts
| ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On September 22 2016 14:34 Spazer wrote: Because they want their brand to be easy to find for people who aren't necessarily part of the gaming industry. I think the history greatly outweighs this name change. Terrible idea. | ||
|
paralleluniverse
4065 Posts
On September 22 2016 06:58 Qwyn wrote: Wat? The name has always been Battle.net  . Does that mean it's Blizzard.net now? Doesn't feel quite right to log onto Blizzard.net . No. I think it simply won't have a name. You just play multiplayer online and that's it, like how there's no name for the single player service. It's understandable but I like Battle.net and will continue to call it that. | ||
|
DickMcFanny
Ireland1076 Posts
On September 23 2016 00:46 Lucumo wrote: This is dumb. They should just keep it for the older games (< Warcraft 3) since at least back then it was still good. That would be nice. | ||
|
Dingodile
4139 Posts
On September 23 2016 00:46 Lucumo wrote: This is dumb. They should just keep it for the older games (< Warcraft 3) since at least back then it was still good. I think because of the confusion about bnet 1.0 and 2.0, it merges to "Blizzard Launcher" (Bnet 2.0 functionality) and we can play D2 LoD HD, D1 HD, WC3 HD and SC:BW HD on "Blizzard Launcher". | ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On September 23 2016 01:27 Dingodile wrote: I think because of the confusion about bnet 1.0 and 2.0, it merges to "Blizzard Launcher" (Bnet 2.0 functionality) and we can play D2 LoD HD, D1 HD, WC3 HD and SC:BW HD on "Blizzard Launcher". Was there ever confusion though? It was always Battle.net for Blizzard and the names completely belong together. Even for people who are new and never visited a forum or anything for the game they are playing, it's not hard to see that this is the platform for the game and the platform's name obviously isn't the company's name. From the way I see it, the move is partly to increase the Blizzard brand (make it more visible) and partly to say: "Hey, you guys are too dumb to see that this belongs to us". | ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8306 Posts
| ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12240 Posts
On September 23 2016 02:01 Lucumo wrote: Was there ever confusion though? It was always Battle.net for Blizzard and the names completely belong together. Even for people who are new and never visited a forum or anything for the game they are playing, it's not hard to see that this is the platform for the game and the platform's name obviously isn't the company's name. From the way I see it, the move is partly to increase the Blizzard brand (make it more visible) and partly to say: "Hey, you guys are too dumb to see that this belongs to us". It wasn't uncommon to read posts on the Battle.net forums that said "BNET FIX UR GAME", "I HAVE BEEN A BNET CUSTOMER FOR YEARS" and so on. | ||
| ||
