EPTgg wp.
Top 30 streamers July 2016 - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16921 Posts
gg wp. | ||
|
GSTL
18 Posts
On August 09 2016 02:33 dr3am_b3ing wrote: How authentic is UltraGamer's numbers? Are they not skewed by bots? You allow bots in your determining of stats? Seems to not properly represent "top" streamers, just streamers who have a high view count. "view" count. Of course authentic - Twitched "cleared" WInter's stream, PatchToss obviously is not cheating too since he has the same number of viewers as Winter. | ||
|
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
On August 09 2016 03:02 Stijn wrote: Woah woah woah, you're jumping to conclusions here. The numbers come from the Afreeca API. Each stream has multiple viewer counts listed for it, and I happened to use the "current viewer count" metric, which apparently doesn't include mobile viewers (it's listed as "desktop viewers" on Afreeca). It's true that I wasn't aware that "current viewer count" doesn't include all viewers (maybe it did before? I can't check, unfortunately), but it's not like I went to Afreeca, picked a random number and used that as the metric. Still a simple check on the sidebar would have sufficed to see that your numbers are totally off and should not be published as such. Look at https://bwstreams.appspot.com/. Their current viewers are all by about an order of magnitude higher than your estimates. You should take your estimates out as otherwise it could be wrongly cross-referenced. Appreciate your effort, but please be careful next time. | ||
|
avilo
United States4100 Posts
-_- | ||
|
sweffymo
United States62 Posts
On August 09 2016 14:24 duke91 wrote: Still a simple check on the sidebar would have sufficed to see that your numbers are totally off and should not be published as such. Look at https://bwstreams.appspot.com/. Their current viewers are all by about an order of magnitude higher than your estimates. You should take your estimates out as otherwise it could be wrongly cross-referenced. Appreciate your effort, but please be careful next time. >Provides free service without being asked >Does extra work at users' request >Gets shitted on anyway | ||
|
B-royal
Belgium1330 Posts
On August 09 2016 23:35 sweffymo wrote: >Provides free service without being asked >Does extra work at users' request >Gets shitted on anyway BW is love, BW is life. Misrepresenting BW's popularity is a serious offense  It's very much appreciated that he puts in a lot of effort to bring these statistics. However, I'm sure he understands that bringing out erroneous statistics (and not by a small margin) can backfire and be interpreted as intentionally misleading, regardless of good intentions or not. So while I do not condone aggressive and spiteful feedback, I am not surprised by it occuring. | ||
|
n3p
93 Posts
| ||
| ||
