EPT
Life arrested/taken into custody and under investigation -…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
We know this is a crazy and sensitive issue, especially since Life is the most high profile player to be caught up in an "investigation". But please stay calm and refrain from slandering players until we have more information. Egregious posts will be dealt with accordingly. PLEASE READ THE OP BEFORE POSTING | ||
|
ETisME
12758 Posts
| ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
On January 29 2016 22:53 Penev wrote: Someone put Zealously on suicide watch just in case btw I might need it too actually.. We're three then. | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
| ||
|
Wrath
3174 Posts
On January 29 2016 23:06 nimdil wrote: I like how the OP phrased it: It sounds like slandering players might be acceptable in the future  Yeah, once we have more information, we may slander the shit out of them, even TL staff may help with this haha  | ||
|
Lumi
United States1616 Posts
On January 29 2016 22:49 brickrd wrote: in what insane lewis carroll universe would life have any grounds to sue anyone here? I think you're a funny person because, as I've seen throughout this thread, you're capable of expecting people to give you the time of day when you stink of disrespect from across the world. | ||
|
207aicila
1237 Posts
On January 29 2016 23:05 palexhur wrote: Savior earned a lot of more money than life, but he was greedy, being large of money doesnt relate to be inoccent or guilty of matchfixing in SC world. Absolutely incorrect. It's well known by now that the pros involved in the BW matchfixing scandal weren't paid much for their troubles, certainly not compared to sAviOr's salary and tournament winnings. It's also known that in sAviOr's case in particular, boredom and lack of passion for the game played a big role rather than greed. | ||
|
Nomzter
Sweden2802 Posts
| ||
|
THERIDDLER
Canada131 Posts
| ||
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On January 29 2016 23:01 Penev wrote: that's not how probability works. he's under investigation which in itself makes him an isolated case. Hmm, it seems you're making the same mistake you accuse others of now. Things like this are actually more prevalent when people lack/ need money. if life were NOT being investigated, then you could say that he is less likely in a predictive sense to do such a thing based on demographic data (assuming such data actually indicates less success increases those odds, which is believable, but i don't have those numbers) but once he's accused, if for example he were on trial it would not make any sense to try to defend him by saying "well, he's successful, so why would he do it?" sure, his lawyer would probably try to insinuate exactly that, just like lawyers of rich white people try to argue that they're successful and respected in their communities. but it's not real logic. you can't argue that someone robbed a bank because they're poor and poor people need money, and it doesn't make sense in reverse either this is all assuming there is legitimate evidence of something and that there's no crazy conspiracy to frame life, which is possible as far as i know. but if there is legit evidence, that affects him as a data point, and it becomes a question of did he do something, yes or no, not "would he" do something all that said, we still don't know all of this. but people are talking, and one of the things they're saying is that he wouldn't do it because he's rich, which is very very very silly. | ||
|
Silvana
3713 Posts
| ||
|
Locke-
499 Posts
| ||
|
Penev
28535 Posts
On January 29 2016 23:09 brickrd wrote: that's not how probability works. he's under investigation which in itself makes him an isolated case. if life were NOT being investigated, then you could say that he is less likely in a predictive sense to do such a thing based on demographic data (assuming such data actually indicates less success increases those odds, which is believable, but i don't have those numbers) but once he's accused, if for example he were on trial it would not make any sense to try to defend him by saying "well, he's successful, so why would he do it?" sure, his lawyer would probably try to insinuate exactly that, just like lawyers of rich white people try to argue that they're successful and respected in their communities. but it's not real logic. you can't argue that someone robbed a bank because they're poor and poor people need money, and it doesn't make sense in reverse either this is all assuming there is legitimate evidence of something and that there's no crazy conspiracy to frame life, which is possible as far as i know. but if there is legit evidence, that affects him as a data point, and it becomes a question of did he do something, yes or no, not "would he" do something all that said, we still don't know all of this. but people are talking, and one of the things they're saying is that he wouldn't do it because he's rich, which is very very very silly. True. If anything, it's more understandable (less bad?) when poor people commit an economic crime But I don't think Musicus said "he wouldn't do it because he's rich" | ||
|
Weavel
Finland9223 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37096 Posts
I'm so shocked that I don't even know how to properly express myself right now... | ||
|
Sakat
Croatia1599 Posts
On January 29 2016 23:14 Weavel wrote: Probably just a normal questioning. I don't think he would be arrested if it was just questioning | ||
|
Silvana
3713 Posts
It was confirmed that it was Life who requested the transfer from KT to Freecs. Why do you think he did that? | ||
|
Amazonic
Sweden239 Posts
Life I love you come back | ||
|
Sakat
Croatia1599 Posts
On January 29 2016 23:16 Silvana wrote: Let's try to deviate the attention to something not painful. It was confirmed that it was Life who requested the transfer from KT to Freecs. Why do you think he did that? Didn't like KT? | ||
|
NEEDZMOAR
Sweden1277 Posts
Can I get in on that? Cant focus on work at all right now...cant believe im this distracted because of SC2. | ||
|
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On January 29 2016 23:14 Weavel wrote: Probably just a normal questioning. I don't think KeSPA would prevent him from playing until the investigation ends if it was a questioning. | ||
| ||
