|
On April 12 2015 04:56 Tanzklaue wrote:fruitdealer won 1 tournament, and did nothing else. yes, it was the first big tournament win ever, but still he did nothing impressive afterwards.
The very first GSL was impressive in his own right. And if you don't (or can't) remember, Zergs were underperforming back in the day. FD play at the very first GSL marked the concept of how Zerg should macro, even to this day. Expand, drone, expand, attack. Every Zerg play by that norm when they play macro.
|
On April 12 2015 04:50 Darkhorse wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2015 04:48 Zealously wrote:On April 12 2015 04:47 Darkhorse wrote:On April 12 2015 04:21 nkr wrote: 1. Life 2. MVP 3. Nestea 4. IdrA 5. MC 6. MMA 7. HuK 8. sOs 9. Parting 10. Polt 11. Stephano 12. Innovation 13. Maru 14. Naniwa 15. Soulkey what the hell? You guys have some weird predictions D: I don't think that's a prediction ![](/mirror/smilies/puh2.gif) That was just the weirdest one. All the others are still weird D:
You guys are weird.
|
i love how many people put sos in their top 10 when the article already established that sos is behind leenock on rank 16 by the smallest margin. soulkey is prolly rank 17. that or i overestimated one of my guys in the top 10.
|
Stephano deserves to be in there. His style was mimicked everywhere and abused to the max.
|
Russian Federation605 Posts
Why people keep mentioning sOs, if it's clear from Leenok's article, that he is not in the list?
Well, that's what I came up with: 10. Polt 9. Rain 8. Innovation 7. Nestea 6. Zest 5. MMA 4. MC 3. TaeJa 2. Mvp 1. Life
Decided Life/Mvp question with a coinflip =D
TL staff should make top15 best foreigners as well, I believe it'll cause even more drama.
After another coinflip decided to switch MMA and Nestea, cause their positions were the only ones(besides Life/Mvp) that I couldn't easily come up with.
|
On April 12 2015 05:00 Apoteosis wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2015 04:56 Tanzklaue wrote:On April 12 2015 04:55 Apoteosis wrote: No FruitDealer ?
Come on !!! fruitdealer won 1 tournament, and did nothing else. yes, it was the first big tournament win ever, but still he did nothing impressive afterwards. The very first GSL was impressive in his own right. And if you don't (or can't) remember, Zergs were underperforming back in the day. FD play at the very first GSL marked the concept of how Zerg should macro, even to this day. Expand, drone, expand, attack. Every Zerg play by that norm when they play macro. and again, he won 1 tournament, then did jackshit after that. he never had another deep run. by that logic we shpould put seed in there, who won GSL after no protoss had won it for years. also the seocnd winner was nestea, another zerg. i dunno, but purely based on tournament wins we might have overestimated imbalances. the next 2 winners of the tournament were terran and protoss. terran dominance only started after the infancy phase of sc2.
|
On April 12 2015 05:01 Kluey wrote: Stephano deserves to be in there. His style was mimicked everywhere and abused to the max.
I suppose the word "greatest" is rather subjective.
|
Nestea deserves top 5 for sure. 3 GSL wins (1 of which he won without dropping a game), 1 top 4. 3 top 8s. 3rd place at IPL4. 2nd place blizzcon. Nestea award etc. Even though he always lost to MVP he was one of the only players that could actually take games off him during his prime. If it wasn't for Nestea MVP would have for sure won a GSL without losing a game. Most of his achievements were while zerg was underpowered.
|
How many have been brainwashed by Artosis O.o Nestea.. rly? even in some of ur top 5's...
|
United States23455 Posts
People with Polt below 7th are silly
|
nice, can't wait to see the rest
my guess....
10 Parting Rain MarineKing (I actually feel like he should be lower but he wasn't in 15-11 so...) 9 NesTea 8 Zest 7 Polt 6 MC 5 Innovation 4 MMA 3 TaeJa 2 Mvp (gasp!) 1 Life
I also feel like Rain deserves a spot, too many good players idk it's just a rough guess list edit: just saw MarineKing is #11 lol edit 2: Parting over Rain lol
|
On April 12 2015 05:09 Darkhorse wrote: People with Polt below 7th are silly
On April 12 2015 05:10 Die4Ever wrote:+ Show Spoiler + nice, can't wait to see the rest
my guess....
10 MarineKing (I actually feel like he should be lower but he wasn't in 15-11 so...) 9 NesTea 8 Zest 7 Polt 6 MC 5 Innovation 4 MMA 3 TaeJa 2 Mvp (gasp!) 1 Life
I also feel like Rain deserves a spot, too many good players idk it's just a rough guess list
lol
|
Russian Federation605 Posts
On April 12 2015 05:10 Die4Ever wrote: 10 MarineKing (I actually feel like he should be lower but he wasn't in 15-11 so...)
He is 11th in the article.
|
like always nice writing stuchiu
1-mvp 2-life 100% sure
i don't know for the rest
edit : except the one that are already here ofc
|
On April 12 2015 05:11 Ardias wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2015 05:10 Die4Ever wrote: 10 MarineKing (I actually feel like he should be lower but he wasn't in 15-11 so...)
He is 11th in the article. oh crap I missed that one!
|
United States23455 Posts
On April 12 2015 05:10 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2015 05:10 Die4Ever wrote:+ Show Spoiler + nice, can't wait to see the rest
my guess....
10 MarineKing (I actually feel like he should be lower but he wasn't in 15-11 so...) 9 NesTea 8 Zest 7 Polt 6 MC 5 Innovation 4 MMA 3 TaeJa 2 Mvp (gasp!) 1 Life
I also feel like Rain deserves a spot, too many good players idk it's just a rough guess list
lol Right in the sweet spot
But you're still silly for Inno above Polt. Or maybe even MMA
|
my favourite part was that marineking's article basically was "he sucks, he is dumb, wasted potential", then "he totes better than soo tho".
i kinda feel a discrepancy there. not that i disagree with the sentiment, but maybe he would've deserved to be palced lower.
|
RIP the top 20 I was writing
|
I am dying of curiosity to know what are the 10 players that are greater of all times then Maru!
|
Mute City2363 Posts
On April 12 2015 05:13 Tanzklaue wrote: my favourite part was that marineking's article basically was "he sucks, he is dumb, wasted potential", then "he totes better than soo tho".
i kinda feel a discrepancy there. not that i disagree with the sentiment, but maybe he would've deserved to be palced lower.
Just because he could have achieved far more doesn't deduct from the results he had
|
|
|
|