EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/nl2LGAt.png)
Is this a new thing for the '15 seasons? Or has it been there before? Have any players been requested to do this so far?
2015 WCS Handbook released - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
fruity.
England1711 Posts
Is this a new thing for the '15 seasons? Or has it been there before? Have any players been requested to do this so far? | ||
Waxangel
United States33581 Posts
On February 10 2015 19:23 Azhrak wrote: For comparison, in 2014 handbook the rule was "Gambling – Players are not allowed to place wagers on any matches or actions in, or around, the World Championship Series." that's fine -- rotterdam isn't a player :D | ||
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
digmouse
China6330 Posts
=D | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
Purview is a visual method specially adapted for kittens, so that sentence implies that the tournament administrator will be of a feline persuasion, probably slightly increasing the administration quality compared to previous tournaments. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://cutearoo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Kitten1.jpg) | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On February 10 2015 19:33 Waxangel wrote: that's fine -- rotterdam isn't a player :D Dude he made ro64 in the qualifier and almost beat Xenocider with the rotti builds. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2015_WCS_Season_1/Qualifier/America ) Just as his career started to peak they put in this rule to specifically counter him. Good work Aeromi love that quest log xD | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On February 10 2015 15:00 Waxangel wrote: I assume they're just gonna force them to take off the patches/cover them up when competing in WCS? I guess that would be a fair compromise to avoid trouble. They can't just ban all the Liquid players  . | ||
|
Agh
United States1042 Posts
On February 10 2015 19:26 fruity. wrote: Is this a new thing for the '15 seasons? Or has it been there before? Have any players been requested to do this so far? All players would be required for future games, but it's a pretty moot requirement as it wasn't in place for the qualifiers. | ||
|
digmouse
China6330 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On February 10 2015 22:51 digmouse wrote: Yes the anti cheat part is new, see https://www.diffchecker.com/jloyuj0j Interesting that this part is new. I guess it's called the Lillekanin rule? (or the Swarm Host rule I guess) d: F. Cheating - Players must compete to the best of their ability at all times. | ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
| ||
|
Yakikorosu
1203 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On February 11 2015 00:42 KingofdaHipHop wrote: I'm so happy for Aeromi, also glad that Blizzard finally released this. Is it possible for all the changes to be highlighted somewhere? Literally one and two posts above yours d: On February 11 2015 00:42 Yakikorosu wrote: Wait so ONLY the champion is auto-seeded into Premier next season? The other 31 players all drop to Challenger? Formerly in WCS America/Europe you auto-qualified for Premier just for making it to Ro16, which I thought was too many people, but just the champion seems too few. What's wrong with the "top 8" model GSL's been using forever? Well, isn't it way funnier to make everyone go back to Challenger considering it's a single Bo5 format and not a group format? | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
| ||
|
Lexender
Mexico2656 Posts
On February 10 2015 23:05 OtherWorld wrote: Interesting that this part is new. I guess it's called the Lillekanin rule? (or the Swarm Host rule I guess) d: I don't see how that rule has much to do with Lillekanin games, that part obviously refers to match fixing (competing to the best of their ability -> to not throw matches on purpose) | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13993 Posts
On February 11 2015 03:36 Lexender wrote: I don't see how that rule has much to do with Lillekanin games, that part obviously refers to match fixing (competing to the best of their ability -> to not throw matches on purpose) What exactly did lillekanin do? | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On February 11 2015 03:36 Lexender wrote: I don't see how that rule has much to do with Lillekanin games, that part obviously refers to match fixing (competing to the best of their ability -> to not throw matches on purpose) I'm pretty sure turtling in a corner of the map with vikings/ravens/CC and displaying 0 APM would be considered as not competing to the best of one's ability. Much like a Zerg (Miniraiser?) was DQ'ed from that British tournament because he wasn't trying to win the game. It also applies to match-fixing obviously, but I feel it's not the only reason. | ||
|
Chaggi
Korea (South)1936 Posts
Didn't he basically take his hands off the keyboard and like walk around or something? Like very obviously not playing the game | ||
|
Yakikorosu
1203 Posts
On February 11 2015 00:47 OtherWorld wrote: Well, isn't it way funnier to make everyone go back to Challenger considering it's a single Bo5 format and not a group format? Well Challenger in WCS AM/EU was Bo5 last year too... anyway I don't mind that much I just wonder if this is good for the WCS tournament. The result of dropping everyone but champion to Challenger where they could be eliminated in a single Bo5 is a lot more churn in the tournament meaning a lot more likely that fan favorites could be eliminated. For example let's assume NaNiwa (a player I dislike but who is very popular with foreign fans) has an amazing run this season of WCS and ends up in the finals where he happens to lose. Next season he's straight back to Challenger where he might get matched up against Scarlett or Jaedong or some unknown player who cheeses him out? I question the wisdom of the decision for WCS' popularity. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
Played several qualifiers displaying a mech/mass raven turtling style that made up for very long games, delaying the entire brackets (did one of his game beat the Mana vs Firecake record? I don't remember). And by turtling style I mean turtling style, not trying to win at all. However that did not led to him being DQ'ed because there was no rule about that by then ; what got him DQ'ed was checking Twitter/Twitch chat while in game, walking out of his chair and being literally AFK during the game, as well as writing "I'm a terrorist. Jihad" at the end of the game when Seeker Missile'ing his own Raven fleet. | ||
| ||
