EPTTvT no more ! No more TvT ! Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn !
Also group G group of death for viewers ! Hope Mvp will show amazing games or theses guys might kill us all with SH.
WCS Europe Premier Ro32 Groups Announced - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
klup
France612 Posts
TvT no more ! No more TvT ! Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn ! Also group G group of death for viewers ! Hope Mvp will show amazing games or theses guys might kill us all with SH. | ||
|
FluoCrazyKenny
France90 Posts
| ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On February 12 2014 18:10 FluoCrazyKenny wrote: hum ? Why do they play on Saturday, February 22nd and Saturday, March 1st ? I though that Blizzard said that they didn't want to overlap WCS and other tournaments on week-ends ? There is no tournament on those weekends. | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10307 Posts
That's the spirit, King Arthur! | ||
|
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
| ||
|
TheSilenceSC2
United Kingdom1 Post
| ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On February 12 2014 20:24 DJHelium wrote: I asked Kennigit about the groups on twitter, he said they were "randomized but adjusted based on player schedule group balance". I'm not sure what this means, would love if someone explained it to me! https://twitter.com/Kennigit/status/433445925277560832 So they were originally random, but then adjusted. That sounds kind of like not random to me. | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On February 12 2014 23:45 Darkhoarse wrote: So they were originally random, but then adjusted. That sounds kind of like not random to me. Maybe the original draw gave a Mvp jjakji MMA ForGG group and they felt forced to act. | ||
|
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On February 12 2014 23:48 TheDwf wrote: Maybe the original draw gave a Mvp jjakji MMA ForGG group and they felt forced to act. Yeah it's true I wouldn't really want that to be a ro32 group, although how much fun would that be? | ||
|
jakethesnake
Canada4948 Posts
On February 13 2014 00:07 Darkhoarse wrote: Yeah it's true I wouldn't really want that to be a ro32 group, although how much fun would that be? It would be really fun for 3 hours, but then disappointing for a few weeks. Not worth it. | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
HYPE | ||
|
elwood.sc2
Germany35 Posts
There's no group no death here I think and like Code S much more despite lack of terran players. | ||
|
Korleone
France5 Posts
What if they had thought at the next round seeds ? | ||
|
igay
Australia1178 Posts
| ||
|
AlgeriaT
Sweden2197 Posts
| ||
|
SpunXtain20
Australia554 Posts
| ||
|
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
| ||
|
ScoutWBF
Germany641 Posts
On February 13 2014 18:02 DJHelium wrote: What does the players think of getting placed into groups like this? I know I would get kinda upset knowing that I might've gotten easier opponents with a random draw. If you lose in the group stages, you wouldn't have had a chance to advance in the next group stage anyway. Imo players got to deal with it and go for the gold. If one cannot even deal with a "more difficult" group, then they don't deserve to win the whole thing or get more cash from better ranks. | ||
|
GreenFate
France289 Posts
 | ||
|
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
On February 13 2014 18:12 ScoutWBF wrote: If you lose in the group stages, you wouldn't have had a chance to advance in the next group stage anyway. Imo players got to deal with it and go for the gold. If one cannot even deal with a "more difficult" group, then they don't deserve to win the whole thing or get more cash from better ranks. Of course you would have. If the best 3 players are placed in a group together, one of them will not advance, where in any other group that player would've won. It's obviously not the case here, but some players do get harder groups than others. I would like more transparency from ESL's side to show the group selecting process. | ||
| ||
