EPTAnyway, I looked at INnoVation's performance. Lots of +∞ that make it impossible to compare. I can't help myself thinking that those ratings comparing to expected performance in rational numbers are bogus.
Aligulac.com changelog and feedback thread - Page 17
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
kurosu_
France46 Posts
Anyway, I looked at INnoVation's performance. Lots of +∞ that make it impossible to compare. I can't help myself thinking that those ratings comparing to expected performance in rational numbers are bogus. | ||
Grovbolle
Denmark3807 Posts
On December 02 2013 19:14 kurosu_ wrote: I was eager to see the ELO performance of TaeJa and was disappointed. But I was also very impressed the instantaneous overall performance rating of 2440, e.g. to see the best performance (eg given at least some minimal count in matches). Is there a way to retrieve data based on this? Anyway, I looked at INnoVation's performance. Lots of +∞ that make it impossible to compare. I can't help myself thinking that those ratings comparing to expected performance in rational numbers are bogus. 2 things: 1: Elo, not ELO. 2: We do not use Elo  | ||
|
kurosu_
France46 Posts
On December 02 2013 19:27 Grovbolle wrote: 2 things: 1: Elo, not ELO. 2: We do not use Elo Well OK, but can we not focus on what I feel is a red herring ? :-) I'd be more interested in knowing how to retrieve information related to the Whatever performance as seen in each period/list report. | ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3807 Posts
On December 02 2013 20:08 kurosu_ wrote: Well OK, but can we not focus on what I feel is a red herring ? :-) I'd be more interested in knowing how to retrieve information related to the Whatever performance as seen in each period/list report. I'll poke TheBB for an answer | ||
|
GreenMash
Norway1746 Posts
| ||
|
Prillan
Sweden350 Posts
On December 02 2013 19:14 kurosu_ wrote: I was eager to see the ELO performance of TaeJa and was disappointed. But I was also very impressed the instantaneous overall performance rating of 2440, e.g. to see the best performance (eg given at least some minimal count in matches). Is there a way to retrieve data based on this? Anyway, I looked at INnoVation's performance. Lots of +∞ that make it impossible to compare. I can't help myself thinking that those ratings comparing to expected performance in rational numbers are bogus. It's not available from the site but you can download the database dump here (click the link). The performance value are stored in the rating table in columns comp_rat, comp_rat_vp, comp_rat_vt and comp_rat_vz. A value of -1000 indicates undefined. To get the integer values as displayed on the site you have to add the value by 1 and multiply by 1000. Example query: + Show Spoiler + For Innovation who has id 48 we can do the following SELECT period_id, comp_rat, comp_rat_vp FROM rating WHERE player_id = CAST('48' AS INT) ORDER BY period_id;For example, Innovations performance vP was (0.990588879995195 + 1) * 1000 = 1990.588879995195 which is rounded to 1991 on the site. | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On December 02 2013 20:08 kurosu_ wrote: Well OK, but can we not focus on what I feel is a red herring ? :-) I'd be more interested in knowing how to retrieve information related to the Whatever performance as seen in each period/list report. That should be possible with the API which is coming up (and it really is coming up this time, no joke). There's no built-in function for this because I thought the two-week period is rather arbitrary and it sometimes splits in the middle of tournaments. On December 02 2013 20:21 GreenMash wrote: Are you going to add the newest patch to the Balance report ? If it seems significant enough. I don't know, I haven't paid attention. | ||
|
StarGalaxy
Germany744 Posts
| ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
| ||
|
StarGalaxy
Germany744 Posts
On December 06 2013 08:07 TheBB wrote: If you are talking about the match history or adjustments page, then I just fixed those. yes thx! works fine now | ||
|
StarGalaxy
Germany744 Posts
| ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3807 Posts
On December 06 2013 13:51 StarGalaxy wrote: acutally the results/search isn't working 'twas fixed | ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3807 Posts
On December 09 2013 11:35 slowbacontron wrote: So I looked up Aligulac on my desktop computer and it said jjakji is currently #16, then I looked it up on my phone and it had jjakji at #10 which got me all excited. I had to physically F5 the site on my desktop to get it to show the updated ratings, any insight on why this is? Your desktop sucks. :-D | ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3807 Posts
| ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
Orek
1665 Posts
| ||
|
Prillan
Sweden350 Posts
If there's some specific months you'd like the numbers for I can probably compile a list for you. | ||
|
Prillan
Sweden350 Posts
Example: To get all PvPs in September this year. Go to http://aligulac.com/api/beta/match/?format=json&date__gte=2013-09-01&date__lt=2013-10-01&rca=P&rcb=P&apikey=APIKEY. As you can see, the count is 352. {"meta": {"limit": 20, ... "total_count": 352} ... For easier viewing, use this Chrome extension: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/jsonview/chklaanhfefbnpoihckbnefhakgolnmc Bonus part: If you have access to a unix like system you can run: curl -s "URL" | sed -e 's/.*total_count": \([0-9][0-9]*\).*/\1\n/' where URL is the url above and it will output the number. $ curl -s "http://aligulac.com/ ... &apikey=APIKEY" | sed -e 's/.*total_count": \([0-9][0-9]*\).*/\1\n/' Note that I did not claim that it was easy. However, this is the only way to grab the data for users (without downloading the database). | ||
| ||
