EPTIf there was a way you could add salary to this....
Earnings Per Game - A diff way to look at earnings - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Nvmz
34 Posts
If there was a way you could add salary to this.... | ||
|
Rachnar
France1526 Posts
| ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
 | ||
|
SigmaoctanusIV
United States3313 Posts
On September 27 2012 16:03 canikizu wrote: What about the worst? We need a list of that too. The 100,000s of Players who haven't earned any money and are still in negative earnings due to cost of buying starcraft. | ||
|
FuzzyJAM
Scotland9300 Posts
On September 27 2012 17:29 SigmaoctanusIV wrote: The 100,000s of Players who haven't earned any money and are still in negative earnings due to cost of buying starcraft. It's going by TLPD games though, and most people don't have a TLPD page.  | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
Edit: I assume "Leagues played" in TLPD can be used for tournaments joined? Edit2: Probably not, because it includes Up/Downs and Code A. Or should those count as separate tournaments from Code S? Since a Code S seed is technically assured prize money for next season. | ||
|
JJH777
United States4415 Posts
On September 27 2012 16:58 Maxilicious wrote: Interesting concept. Judging from Nestea's earning per game, one can say that Nestea either makes it real far in a tournament or just gets knocked out of a tournament really early. Not really it's just because Nestea doesn't play in very many tournaments. | ||
|
zestzorb
Thailand776 Posts
On September 27 2012 16:31 lichter wrote: It took about 15 minutes >.> I think it's interesting to keep him there. Despite losing so often and not doing anything after season 1, he still made quite a bit of money and didn't have to work for it much (which is great since he was probably drunk a lot apparently). He's just there for reference and because I find it funny. Maybe a better idea is to set a certain threshold of games played, i.e., only include players with 200+ games played. | ||
|
AmericanUmlaut
Germany2582 Posts
On September 27 2012 18:12 zestzorb wrote: Maybe a better idea is to set a certain threshold of games played, i.e., only include players with 200+ games played. Then you end up with everyone who's ever made it out of the MLG open bracket on your list. | ||
|
zestzorb
Thailand776 Posts
On September 27 2012 18:34 AmericanUmlaut wrote: Then you end up with everyone who's ever made it out of the MLG open bracket on your list. No it would include most of established pros in the scene. People who just makes it out of some qualifiers without actually winning stuff won't make it to the list. | ||
|
babysimba
10466 Posts
| ||
|
mccarthyaw
50 Posts
| ||
|
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
| ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On September 27 2012 19:44 mccarthyaw wrote: Did you only do offline tournaments, or did you do all tournaments someone has competed in? TLPD includes online tournies and that's the data I used. Too difficult to read through each tournie and segregate each type On September 27 2012 20:08 Paljas wrote: the funny thing about polt is the fact, that the super tournament had the biggest prize pool. That's... really sad =/ | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45172 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
| ||
|
Abort Retry Fail
2636 Posts
Nice appraoch to the game sir, thanks/ | ||
|
Butterednuts
United States859 Posts
| ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
| ||
|
Luisa_2
Germany200 Posts
| ||
| ||
