|
You have to provide some kind of evidence/proof (screenshots/replays etc.) if you are going to accuse somebody.
Additionally, a supporting comment of what people should be looking for and when will be necessary if you are posting replays/evidence. |
On October 03 2012 04:24 AnomalySC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:22 hunts wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:21 Zennith wrote: 500 points right now isn't high masters. I'm at 700 and don't consider myself high masters. I haven't laddered in forever......I literally can't. It's pointless to even try. then why do you only have 82 bonus pool? Thats what, a few weeks of not laddering or so? Thats a long time no?
That's less than 1 week. 1 week of not laddering is a long time? IDK
|
On October 03 2012 04:36 jidolboy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:24 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 hunts wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:21 Zennith wrote: 500 points right now isn't high masters. I'm at 700 and don't consider myself high masters. I haven't laddered in forever......I literally can't. It's pointless to even try. then why do you only have 82 bonus pool? Thats what, a few weeks of not laddering or so? Thats a long time no? That's less than 1 week. 1 week of not laddering is a long time? IDK
It's been longer than a week for sure. Still, even then, points climb fairly quick. What are we even arguing about at this point anyways?
|
Evidently not, based on bonus pool.
|
On October 03 2012 04:38 Zennith wrote: Evidently not, based on bonus pool.
What is your deal, why would I EVER make up something so ridiculous. Still waiting on your tips on whats wrong with my play. Or did you even watch it? I think not.
|
On October 03 2012 04:37 AnomalySC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:36 jidolboy wrote:On October 03 2012 04:24 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 hunts wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:21 Zennith wrote: 500 points right now isn't high masters. I'm at 700 and don't consider myself high masters. I haven't laddered in forever......I literally can't. It's pointless to even try. then why do you only have 82 bonus pool? Thats what, a few weeks of not laddering or so? Thats a long time no? That's less than 1 week. 1 week of not laddering is a long time? IDK It's been longer than a week for sure. Still, even then, points climb fairly quick. What are we even arguing about at this point anyways? "Master League -- 90 points per week (1 per 112 minutes)" Taken from the ladder points and guide sticky.
You are not high masters or even mid. You have not "quit playing a long time ago" and it appears you are a liar.
|
On October 03 2012 04:37 AnomalySC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:36 jidolboy wrote:On October 03 2012 04:24 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 hunts wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:21 Zennith wrote: 500 points right now isn't high masters. I'm at 700 and don't consider myself high masters. I haven't laddered in forever......I literally can't. It's pointless to even try. then why do you only have 82 bonus pool? Thats what, a few weeks of not laddering or so? Thats a long time no? That's less than 1 week. 1 week of not laddering is a long time? IDK It's been longer than a week for sure. Still, even then, points climb fairly quick. What are we even arguing about at this point anyways?
Hmm? For 1v1 or Random Team:
Grandmaster League -- 90 points per week (1 per 112 minutes) Master League -- 90 points per week (1 per 112 minutes) Diamond League -- 52.2 points per week (1 per 193 minutes, 6 seconds). Platinum League -- 52.2 points per week (1 per 193 minutes, 6 seconds). Gold League -- 52.2 points per week (1 per 193 minutes, 6 seconds). Silver League -- 52.2 points per week (1 per 193 minutes, 6 seconds). Bronze League -- 52.2 points per week (1 per 193 minutes, 6 seconds).
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=195273
|
Mkay, you guys got me! I totally made this all up, for...uh...some reason. It certainly feels like it's been longer than a week since I laddered on that account.
|
On October 03 2012 04:39 AnomalySC2 wrote:What is your deal, why would I EVER make up something so ridiculous. Still waiting on your tips on whats wrong with my play. Or did you even watch it? I think not.
I did indeed watch a game. however, I don't feel like wasting my time coaching you. And as to why you would make it up? I dunno. Maybe you're delusional. Either way, I'm sorry, but blizzard does NOT have a vendetta against you.
|
On October 03 2012 04:45 Zennith wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:39 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:38 Zennith wrote: Evidently not, based on bonus pool. What is your deal, why would I EVER make up something so ridiculous. Still waiting on your tips on whats wrong with my play. Or did you even watch it? I think not. I did indeed watch a game. however, I don't feel like wasting my time coaching you. And as to why you would make it up? I dunno. Maybe you're delusional. Either way, I'm sorry, but blizzard does NOT have a vendetta against you.
You don't know what you're talking about, sorry.
|
I'm still waiting to hear what he did that was so bad that made one of the main devs of a game hate him so much as to stalk him and prevent him from winning games.
|
On October 03 2012 04:46 hunts wrote: I'm still waiting to hear what he did that was so bad that made one of the main devs of a game hate him so much as to stalk him and prevent him from winning games.
No thanks, just drop it.
|
On October 03 2012 04:17 AnomalySC2 wrote:I have an account in high masters sitting at 33 and 13, let me find it for you. http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/279014/1/Nocturnal/ladder/leagues#current-rankKeep in mind, I can't ladder on that anymore. It has turned into a massive hard counter and troll fest from my good friends on the balance team. They even whisper and taunt me directly before showing up with the perfect build order ownage. If you're looking for examples of what I mean by build order ownage. Let's say i 1 rax fe into hellion banshee vs zerg. WIthout scouting or anything, they will hit with the perfect 7 roaches right as my 2 hellions pop. It's guaranteed kill or huge damage, nothing I can do about it.
LOL this has to be a troll or the mind of a schizophrenic person
|
On October 03 2012 04:46 AnomalySC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:45 Zennith wrote:On October 03 2012 04:39 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:38 Zennith wrote: Evidently not, based on bonus pool. What is your deal, why would I EVER make up something so ridiculous. Still waiting on your tips on whats wrong with my play. Or did you even watch it? I think not. I did indeed watch a game. however, I don't feel like wasting my time coaching you. And as to why you would make it up? I dunno. Maybe you're delusional. Either way, I'm sorry, but blizzard does NOT have a vendetta against you. You don't know what you're talking about, sorry.
Lol. Good argument. I'm sure you have tons of proof that David Kim hates you.
|
On October 03 2012 04:48 Zennith wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:46 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:45 Zennith wrote:On October 03 2012 04:39 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:38 Zennith wrote: Evidently not, based on bonus pool. What is your deal, why would I EVER make up something so ridiculous. Still waiting on your tips on whats wrong with my play. Or did you even watch it? I think not. I did indeed watch a game. however, I don't feel like wasting my time coaching you. And as to why you would make it up? I dunno. Maybe you're delusional. Either way, I'm sorry, but blizzard does NOT have a vendetta against you. You don't know what you're talking about, sorry. Lol. Good argument. I'm sure you have tons of proof that David Kim hates you.
No not really, I don't actually. Just know that he is a baby that can't take criticism about his poor little game.
|
On October 03 2012 04:31 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:23 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 Apathicsociopath wrote:On October 03 2012 04:09 Zennith wrote:On October 03 2012 04:04 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:02 SupLilSon wrote:On October 03 2012 03:59 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 03:53 SupLilSon wrote:On October 03 2012 03:37 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 03:35 Ragnarork wrote: I just died laughing.... That's the most hilarious thing I've ever heard.. ^_^ Yeah its funny to you, just hope YOU don't piss off the baby David Kim. Especially if they have convinced you you have the chops to make it as a progamer. The "Ex-GM" platinum player. I'm sure you definitely had the makings of a pro. Shame on David Kim. Thats not my account. Also did you watch my stream I linked? Look plat to you? Well the account name was Anomaly, so I guess you and your friend just both really like that name? Also you might not have been plat, but you sure as hell didn't look like ex-GM and even necessarily masters. He had a free name change, so I changed it to Anomaly. He doesn't play anymore. Anyways, not going further into this, you can believe what you want. Also, I dunno what you think of NA gm players but it's actually not even close to EU or kor skill level. You're wrong about GM, first of all. Second of all, it doesn't even matter. You don't really play as well as a low masters on NA, so I fail to see the relevance. did you even look at the video? the play at about 1:40:00 to 2:10:00 (which was the part i watched) certainly doesnt look like anything below (at least) mid-high master Holy crap, someone that might actually believe me LOL. Why are you answering to yourself?
i am not him nor do I find the situation he has presented particularly likely, I merely told my opinion of the play in the posted video not being, as the person i quoted said, not even being near master
just for notes, this is my account: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/2850848/Socio if you wanna make sure its really mine, just message me, Socio.131 on eu
|
On October 03 2012 04:51 Apathicsociopath wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:31 Cokefreak wrote:On October 03 2012 04:23 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 Apathicsociopath wrote:On October 03 2012 04:09 Zennith wrote:On October 03 2012 04:04 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:02 SupLilSon wrote:On October 03 2012 03:59 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 03:53 SupLilSon wrote:On October 03 2012 03:37 AnomalySC2 wrote: [quote]
^_^
Yeah its funny to you, just hope YOU don't piss off the baby David Kim. Especially if they have convinced you you have the chops to make it as a progamer. The "Ex-GM" platinum player. I'm sure you definitely had the makings of a pro. Shame on David Kim. Thats not my account. Also did you watch my stream I linked? Look plat to you? Well the account name was Anomaly, so I guess you and your friend just both really like that name? Also you might not have been plat, but you sure as hell didn't look like ex-GM and even necessarily masters. He had a free name change, so I changed it to Anomaly. He doesn't play anymore. Anyways, not going further into this, you can believe what you want. Also, I dunno what you think of NA gm players but it's actually not even close to EU or kor skill level. You're wrong about GM, first of all. Second of all, it doesn't even matter. You don't really play as well as a low masters on NA, so I fail to see the relevance. did you even look at the video? the play at about 1:40:00 to 2:10:00 (which was the part i watched) certainly doesnt look like anything below (at least) mid-high master Holy crap, someone that might actually believe me LOL. Why are you answering to yourself? i am not him nor do I find the situation he has presented particularly likely, I merely told my opinion of the play in the posted video not being, as the person i quoted said, not even being near master just for notes, this is my account: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/2850848/Socioif you wanna make sure its really mine, just message me, Socio.131 on eu
Thank you sir. As I've already stated many times, I know it sounds like the most ridiculously stupid "story" ever, just know that it IS true. And if you don't believe it, which I don't blame you I probably wouldn't either, then thats fine with me lol. I've also beaten many NA gms in the past, as I said I used to be top 200 way way way back when sc2 launched.
|
On October 03 2012 04:47 AnomalySC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:46 hunts wrote: I'm still waiting to hear what he did that was so bad that made one of the main devs of a game hate him so much as to stalk him and prevent him from winning games. No thanks, just drop it.
But you brought it up, I think it's only natural that we want to know.
|
On October 03 2012 04:30 AnomalySC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:30 city42 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:22 Apathicsociopath wrote:On October 03 2012 04:09 Zennith wrote:On October 03 2012 04:04 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:02 SupLilSon wrote:On October 03 2012 03:59 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 03:53 SupLilSon wrote:On October 03 2012 03:37 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 03:35 Ragnarork wrote: I just died laughing.... That's the most hilarious thing I've ever heard.. ^_^ Yeah its funny to you, just hope YOU don't piss off the baby David Kim. Especially if they have convinced you you have the chops to make it as a progamer. The "Ex-GM" platinum player. I'm sure you definitely had the makings of a pro. Shame on David Kim. Thats not my account. Also did you watch my stream I linked? Look plat to you? Well the account name was Anomaly, so I guess you and your friend just both really like that name? Also you might not have been plat, but you sure as hell didn't look like ex-GM and even necessarily masters. He had a free name change, so I changed it to Anomaly. He doesn't play anymore. Anyways, not going further into this, you can believe what you want. Also, I dunno what you think of NA gm players but it's actually not even close to EU or kor skill level. You're wrong about GM, first of all. Second of all, it doesn't even matter. You don't really play as well as a low masters on NA, so I fail to see the relevance. did you even look at the video? the play at about 1:40:00 to 2:10:00 (which was the part i watched) certainly doesnt look like anything below (at least) mid-high master I watched a couple minutes and it was complete amateur hour. At no point has the skill level of GM been low enough to allow someone like that in. You have to be joking right? Joking about what? Your play is very unrefined but it doesn't burn you in that video because the opponents are diamond. You look like a normal mid-masters player.
Even if there was a giant Blizzard conspiracy against you, you aren't missing out on much when it comes to GM. It's more of an annoyance than anything, because anyone can see your name on the GM ladder page, leading to frequent clan/coaching/team game requests.
|
On October 03 2012 04:56 hunts wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 04:47 AnomalySC2 wrote:On October 03 2012 04:46 hunts wrote: I'm still waiting to hear what he did that was so bad that made one of the main devs of a game hate him so much as to stalk him and prevent him from winning games. No thanks, just drop it. But you brought it up, I think it's only natural that we want to know.
Well too bad :D
|
On October 03 2012 04:17 AnomalySC2 wrote:I have an account in high masters sitting at 33 and 13, let me find it for you. http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/279014/1/Nocturnal/ladder/leagues#current-rankKeep in mind, I can't ladder on that anymore. It has turned into a massive hard counter and troll fest from my good friends on the balance team. They even whisper and taunt me directly before showing up with the perfect build order ownage. If you're looking for examples of what I mean by build order ownage. Let's say i 1 rax fe into hellion banshee vs zerg. WIthout scouting or anything, they will hit with the perfect 7 roaches right as my 2 hellions pop. It's guaranteed kill or huge damage, nothing I can do about it.
People were at 1k+ points in masters over a week ago. 500 pts isn't even mid-high masters. 700 points is prob mid-high, and 800-900 is solidly "high."
|
|
|
|