EPTRed Bull Battlegrounds - Page 66
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
HeroMystic
United States1217 Posts
| ||
|
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
| ||
|
Zeevo
148 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On May 27 2012 12:10 RPR_Tempest wrote: Even if LastShadow goes 0-6, what does that prove? There are very few players in his position who wouldn't go 0-6, man. Ridiculously hard group. it proves that he shouldnt have been invited. | ||
|
HeroMystic
United States1217 Posts
On May 27 2012 12:10 RPR_Tempest wrote: Even if LastShadow goes 0-6, what does that prove? There are very few players in his position who wouldn't go 0-6, man. Ridiculously hard group. How hard he loses is what matters, and against the first game vs Squirtle... wow. Oh my god, that was horrible to watch. His Marine was extremely delayed. | ||
|
Zapurdead
United States13 Posts
Group C just starting now, cast by Husky | ||
|
JackDT
724 Posts
| ||
|
Holytornados
United States1022 Posts
Props to Red bull. | ||
|
HeroMystic
United States1217 Posts
| ||
|
sansalvador
Austria308 Posts
But he is definitely not some noob picked up on the street, like some intended. | ||
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On May 27 2012 12:57 HeroMystic wrote: I pretty much know exactly why LastShadow decided to all-in, and it's purely because he didn't put down his Armory before his scouting factory died, so he could only get 1-1 upgrades. A very noobish mistake however, and provides a really weak lategame especially against someone like Squirtle who is on top of his macro and upgrades. Yeah, I thought that too. It has to be it because why else would he all-in?... He didn't wanna match a great macro player with late upgrades. | ||
|
askTeivospy
1525 Posts
On May 27 2012 12:10 RPR_Tempest wrote: Even if LastShadow goes 0-6, what does that prove? There are very few players in his position who wouldn't go 0-6, man. Ridiculously hard group. there are many players who wouldnt have went 0-6 O-O | ||
|
Theovide
Sweden914 Posts
On May 27 2012 12:19 jmbthirteen wrote: it proves that he shouldnt have been invited. How? About 30% of the players invited could've gone 0-6 in his group without anyone being suprised. | ||
|
Prophanity
United States165 Posts
On May 27 2012 12:19 jmbthirteen wrote: it proves that he shouldnt have been invited. Looks like Ganzi was a close call then. Edited for punctuation. | ||
|
Nightmarjoo
United States3360 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11045 Posts
Yeah like last shadow was ever going to be very competitive in that group? Even someone like select would have had a tough time with those kids. | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
| ||
|
Alabasern
United States4005 Posts
| ||
|
corpuscle
United States1967 Posts
On May 27 2012 13:19 Prophanity wrote: Looks like Ganzi was a close call then. Edited for punctuation. GanZi went 2-6. Both LS and GanZi went 0-3, but they were vastly different 0-3s even if you completely disregard the map score. | ||
|
Apollo_Shards
1210 Posts
On May 27 2012 12:10 RPR_Tempest wrote: Even if LastShadow goes 0-6, what does that prove? There are very few players in his position who wouldn't go 0-6, man. Ridiculously hard group. Yea, but no self respecting pro would lose a game by a single stalker and zealot behind a double expand (by a protoss mind you) before the 10 minute mark. | ||
| ||
