EPTDo you macro like a pro? - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
MrBarryObama
Korea (South)141 Posts
| ||
|
PeZuY
935 Posts
| ||
|
HackBenjamin
Canada1094 Posts
| ||
|
rysecake
United States2632 Posts
Calculated my sq, average of 76.24 over 10 games. Masters terran. Someone get Mvp's sq please! | ||
|
Xanwi
United Kingdom114 Posts
 | ||
|
xguyx
United States124 Posts
| ||
|
sQueez
12 Posts
| ||
|
awha
Denmark1358 Posts
| ||
|
HTX
Germany265 Posts
thanks for the research and the time to put it together coherently. | ||
|
Scrimpton
United Kingdom465 Posts
On September 17 2011 02:13 MrBarryObama wrote: What surprised me the most was that protoss creates the least workers on average! I assumed it would be terran, since they have mules and protoss have chrono boost. Could it be that protoss expands the least, on average? Or that typically protoss loses the fewest probes? T/Z training on uphill slopes has made them better than the race that got by for 8-9 months with 4gates and 6gates It's explained by protoss being tras,h on average, compared to their equal ranked peers. I'm protoss, we had it silly easy for a while, but now that T/Z are really putting the squeeze on us, it should help a lot! User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
jyLee
United States350 Posts
| ||
|
PSA
United States243 Posts
| ||
|
Nujok
31 Posts
really, really great work sir! | ||
|
MasEo9
United States4 Posts
| ||
|
Adeeler
United Kingdom764 Posts
| ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
I do find it somewhat strange that SQ doesn't seem to be affected by race. Just looking at the gameplay mechanics, it should be lower for Zerg and Protoss players, who will often need to pool resources in preparation for a macro cycle. Mayhaps it simply implies that Terran players are worse at macro? I also have a reservation about only using U and I as data points. If you're gathering this data from replays, it should be possible to detect points in time where players are maxed, or close to maxed (and saving supply for something important), and account for that in the SQ. A less accurate method of doing this, would be to factor game length in. It is intuitive to me that an SQ of 90 over a 15 minute game is less impressive than the same SQ over a 50 minute game. Average income reflects game length to some extent, but this relationship tends to disappear past 20 minutes. | ||
|
mmagic
42 Posts
Would love to see Blizzard calculate and show your SQ in game. | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9448 Posts
On September 17 2011 02:14 rysecake wrote: Wow amazing post! I loved it. Calculated my sq, average of 76.24 over 10 games. Masters terran. Someone get Mvp's sq please! I actually think Majors macro is better. Major has better macro than idra, and would prob be in the low 90's. DRG has better macro than Idra (a lot better actually) and would be prob be close to 100. | ||
|
Godstorm
Romania845 Posts
? | ||
|
tribbe
Germany34 Posts
| ||
| ||
