EPTOnly reasonable way to get more bronze/silver participation would be to reach them in-game somehow. Can't see too many lower league players browsing community sites and then taking the time to do a survey related to something they're probably not too passionate about.
SkillCraft.ca: A SC2 Expertise Study - Page 10
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
http://skillcraft.ca/ -- Go go TL, time to unite and help out! Fill it in and tell your friends! | ||
|
Sokalo
United States375 Posts
Only reasonable way to get more bronze/silver participation would be to reach them in-game somehow. Can't see too many lower league players browsing community sites and then taking the time to do a survey related to something they're probably not too passionate about. | ||
|
CrushDog5
Canada207 Posts
On September 06 2011 12:38 Probulous wrote: . My question is what is the distribution of responses that you are receiving within each league. Are you getting getting a normal distribution of players or are your responses skewed towards the higher end of the spectrum? It's a gut feel, but what if people who have just entered masters, don't feel they "represent" masters? Do you have a way of ensuring that you get a decent distribution of replays? Also do you expect to have similar numbers of participants in each league or would you stratify based on blizzard's estimates for each league. For example, Bronze would be expected to have much larger numbers than masters, how is that dealth with? I'm not sure how you'd tell about the distribution with leagues. You have to pick a specific variable and see how that varies within league. But you'd have no way of knowing if, for example, your sample is mainly high gold vs. low gold. We don't, unfortunately, have access to the MMR for each player, just their league. My hope isn't for an equal proportion to what Blizzard uses. It's pretty clear that we'll have fewer lower level players than higher level players. It won't be a problem unless we don't have enough low level players to get reliable numbers. It's not ideal that the players that have the most variability in their data are also the least likely to participate. We have around 150 bronze now, and I'll breath a sigh of relief when we hit 200. Unless the data are unexpected noisy (always a possibility), we should be fine. It's true though that we will have better estimates of those leagues with the most participants. | ||
|
Kojak21
Canada1104 Posts
done! | ||
|
CrushDog5
Canada207 Posts
On September 06 2011 06:58 Drowsy wrote: I'm a bit surprised there were no questions about sound settings. I recently started playing with sound after playing without since last October and I didn't realize how much of a difference it can make sometimes. I agree with you. Maybe next time. Sigh. | ||
|
vanTuni
389 Posts
What I wondered about was the mouse sensitivity question. What does the % tell you, if you dont know the Windows sens and dpi? | ||
|
Harris1st
Germany7138 Posts
| ||
|
Tryxtira
Sweden572 Posts
On September 06 2011 19:03 Harris1st wrote: does it has to be a 1v1 or is a 2v2, 3v3,.. just fine? I actually have the exact same question, funny the post before me already asked it! I will obviously make everyone I know fill this form out. I love you guys! Gogo, SC2-community! Let's make gaming legit! | ||
|
butchji
Germany1531 Posts
| ||
|
acgFork
Canada397 Posts
| ||
|
Daemonic-Force
Australia3 Posts
 I'll try and get my mates to submit as well | ||
|
Xanczor
United States254 Posts
| ||
|
Xanczor
United States254 Posts
| ||
|
Kyamo
Canada129 Posts
On September 06 2011 19:03 Harris1st wrote: does it has to be a 1v1 or is a 2v2, 3v3,.. just fine? I'm pretty sure the survey asks for only 1v1 replays. | ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
| ||
|
PoisedYeTi
Australia167 Posts
Also i filled in the survey and uploaded a replay. I wish you the best of luck in your research! Pick me | ||
|
Adventurekid
Sweden505 Posts
| ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6184 Posts
Will do tonight ! | ||
|
ALPINA
3791 Posts
| ||
|
Sina92
Sweden1303 Posts
| ||
|
GiftPflanZe
Germany623 Posts
| ||
| ||
