Puma leaves TSL for EG - Page 252

On July 22 2011 08:42 JohnStorm wrote:
It seems like a lot of people don't realize that this is nothing new from Alex Garfield. History is just repeating itself again.

http://www.gotfrag.com/cs/story/43572/

On July 22 2011 08:50 Cite wrote:
This guy is terrible at keeping consistent lol, hes gone from saying they b asically had no intention to recruit him and jhust provided him with a card, to spending hours upon hours with his management securing the budget to provide players like puma this opportunity. To be honest he should probably just stop 'cause hes running circles around himself

On July 22 2011 08:51 thatsundowner wrote:
This guy has gotta be among the best at using a ton of words to say absolutely nothing

On July 22 2011 08:50 Cite wrote:
This guy is terrible at keeping consistent lol, hes gone from saying they b asically had no intention to recruit him and jhust provided him with a card, to spending hours upon hours with his management securing the budget to provide players like puma this opportunity. To be honest he should probably just stop 'cause hes running circles around himself

On July 22 2011 08:52 SafeAsCheese wrote:



Because people who have no place in the discussion like to give their input on teams business practices they disagree with.

On July 22 2011 08:52 SafeAsCheese wrote:



Because people who have no place in the discussion like to give their input on teams business practices they disagree with.

On July 22 2011 08:53 lol wrote:

Hahaha yeah, I'm getting lost here.

On July 22 2011 08:53 Asymmetric wrote:


Then doesn't answer the question. Why is it always EG?

On July 22 2011 08:53 mnck wrote:


Puma hasnt actually signed with EG yet. And Alex Garfield doesn't feel he has done anything wrong.

Then a lot of stuff about future of esports and the relationship between Korea and the western world.

On July 22 2011 08:53 Tomfour wrote:
Alex Garfield seems kind of like a greedy businessman PoS. Watching WoC and he keeps saying how he feels he did things morally/ethically/legally/culturally alright. I don't understand how he is saying that straight faced.

Just because a player isn't under contract doesn't mean you should treat him totally differently in this situation. TSL is probably treating him as best they can, and since he isn't under a contract with them he decides to poach Puma off their team. He himself said he never contacted TSL, how can he justify his actions and say there is (absolutely)no problem with what he did?

On July 22 2011 08:53 Asymmetric wrote:


Then doesn't answer the question. Why is it always EG?

On July 22 2011 08:53 Asymmetric wrote:


Then doesn't answer the question. Why is it always EG?

On July 22 2011 08:52 TaKemE wrote:


Pls listen, they spend hours to securing the budget for a player LIKE puma.

On July 22 2011 08:53 Tomfour wrote:
Just because a player isn't under contract doesn't mean you should treat him totally differently in this situation. TSL is probably treating him as best they can, and since he isn't under a contract with them he decides to poach Puma off their team. He himself said he never contacted TSL, how can he justify his actions and say there is (absolutely)no problem with what he did?