EPTThe Official Live On Three Thread - Page 116
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
CEPEHDREI
Germany1521 Posts
| ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
| ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:44 FreudianTrip wrote: Answering the question is the big deal. Every answer to a question is a fucking joke. It's How To Avoid A Question 101. What exactly is the question? | ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
Did you give ESF less invites than Kespa? What are the magical "Korean SC2 Licensing issues"? Who's getting dat money. Etcetera. | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:52 FreudianTrip wrote: Did you give ESF less invites than Kespa? What are the magical "Korean SC2 Licensing issues"? Who's getting dat money. Yes, ESF has less invites than Kespa. It's in the title. MLG vs Kespa. You want ESF vs Kespa, go watch GSL or OSL. Everything else cannot be answered by contract. So, in other words, all the problems you're having are a lack of common sense. | ||
|
udgnim
United States8024 Posts
MLG is backed by VC money. they need to try to come up with ways of monetizing ways their product and show their investors what works and what doesn't and how sustainable certain models are. | ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
| ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:54 WolfintheSheep wrote: Yes, ESF has less invites than Kespa. It's in the title. MLG vs Kespa. You want ESF vs Kespa, go watch GSL or OSL. Everything else cannot be answered by contract. So, in other words, all the problems you're having are a lack of common sense. Have you watched MLG? Go look at the Top 16 of Summer Championship. | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:52 FreudianTrip wrote: Did you give ESF less invites than Kespa? What are the magical "Korean SC2 Licensing issues"? Who's getting dat money. Etcetera. they really ask that? lol did the person also ask why does one plus one equals two? | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:55 FreudianTrip wrote: MLG doesn't have any players so you can say that all you want. Say what? People want to see Kespa vs The World. That's a selling point, and that's what MLG is pushing. So what exactly is your problem? | ||
|
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:54 udgnim wrote: not sure why Scoots keep going on about MLG charging for PPV MLG is backed by VC money. they need to try to come up with ways of monetizing ways their product and show their investors what works and what doesn't and how sustainable certain models are. Because that's not the reason given for the PPV. He said MLG wouldn't make it PPV if they had a choice, but are forced to by someone. He said it's not kespa forcing them, but someone else. Well who else is there besides kespa to force them to go ppv? Korean illuminati? I applaud scoots for trying to get the real answer. | ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:56 WolfintheSheep wrote: Say what? People want to see Kespa vs The World. That's a selling point, and that's what MLG is pushing. So what exactly is your problem? Look at the top 16 of every MLG since Koreans joined. Now try tell me that ESF aren't part of this "MLG vs Kepsa". You can't see the Forest for the trees dude. The title doesn't matter. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:57 FreudianTrip wrote: Look at the top 16 of every MLG since Koreans joined. Now try tell me that ESF aren't part of this "MLG vs Kepsa". You can't see the Forest for the trees dude. MLG did invite ESF players. And yes it was less than Kespa. This is all known. Why less? Because ESF players are joining EU and NA players while Kespa is on the whole other side of the bracket. | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:57 FreudianTrip wrote: Look at the top 16 of every MLG since Koreans joined. Now try tell me that ESF aren't part of this "MLG vs Kepsa". You can't see the Forest for the trees dude. I don't even know what you're seeing. This is a show tournament. The entire point is to get fan favourites facing off against Kespa legends. It's 24 Kespa players vs 24 of Everyone else. ESF represent(s/ed) 6 of "Everyone else". | ||
|
a3den
704 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:54 udgnim wrote: not sure why Scoots keep going on about MLG charging for PPV. Isn't it pretty obvious ? I'm pretty sure his problem is the fact that MLG is going PPV because they pay money to Kespa (then redistributed to Kespa teams) for players appearances, whereas MLG doesn't pay shit to western teams. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On September 27 2012 08:56 Canucklehead wrote: Because that's not the reason given for the PPV. He said MLG wouldn't make it PPV if they had a choice, but are forced to by someone. He said it's not kespa forcing them, but someone else. Well who else is there besides kespa to force them to go ppv? Korean illuminati? I applaud scoots for trying to get the real answer. What do you want Lee to say though? Its under NDA. He CANT say anything. If I'm thinking here, GOM still actually holds the exclusive broadcasting rights to sc2 in Korea until 2013. Lee said this event would be would be free in 2013. Could be a coincidence. Could be related. | ||
Porcelina
United Kingdom3249 Posts
| ||
|
CrugerDK
Denmark323 Posts
| ||
|
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
On September 27 2012 09:04 CrugerDK wrote: no Stephano makes the whole thing incredibly uninteresting - I mean there's gonna be a few games once in a while worth watching, but for the majority of the matches, i'm just gonna check the results later. Dude I can't believe you don't want to watch Fantasy play Sasquatch. Are you kidding me? It'll be like MVP vs Squirtle Game 5 meets DRG vs MMA Blizzard Cup Final Game 7. | ||
| ||
