EPTEU or NA ladder, which is harder? - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Klosetmonkey
Norway208 Posts
| ||
|
esperanto
Germany357 Posts
| ||
|
Armsved
Denmark642 Posts
On February 10 2011 03:33 Stratus wrote: Eu is 40 countries and NA is 1 you figure it out. Ok I've been trying to figure it out, but I cant. Could you please explain? | ||
|
QTIP.
United States2113 Posts
lol... there are good players everywhere. More importantly, no matter where you are on the ladder, your playing with people of skill level similar to you. So don't try to justify losing games with a "but people here are better" mentality. This kind of discussion just feeds all the sore losers... play your game where you are and get better. As long as there are players better than you on the ladder, you still have work to do. Kill this thread already people are just dissing each other now | ||
|
Striding Strider
United Kingdom787 Posts
Why does Sweden produce such good players? | ||
|
eXwOn
Canada351 Posts
lol... there are good players everywhere. More importantly, no matter where you are on the ladder, your playing with people of skill level similar to you. So don't try to justify losing games with a "but people here are better" mentality. I disagree. At the tip toppity top you don't always get matched with people of your skill, due to lack of people at your level. This leads to the 3:1 w:l ratios that aren't uncommon. | ||
|
Stratus
United States38 Posts
On February 10 2011 03:02 ccHaZaRd wrote: canada carries america, usa really need to step it up :D i apologize i should've said NA is 2 mainly usa and canada. this is just as ignorant sir so gg. But think about it 2 countries competing on a ladder compared to 40 you would think it would be a lil more competitive and therefore harder. | ||
|
dunc
Netherlands1105 Posts
On February 10 2011 04:12 eXwOn wrote: I disagree. At the tip toppity top you don't always get matched with people of your skill, due to lack of people at your level. This leads to the 3:1 w:l ratios that aren't uncommon. How is this not uncommon? There are not many people high on the ladder with higher than 65% win loss. | ||
|
eXwOn
Canada351 Posts
Lets assume the top 200 from NA and EU are close in skill. If the overall server playerbase is good enough, the W:L ratios of T200 will be lower, due to higher amounts of precise matchmaking. Here's the NA: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/1797994 And EU: http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/554903 this could be flawed, however, due to many factors. Just a theory. | ||
|
mcc
Czech Republic4646 Posts
On February 10 2011 03:19 speedphlux wrote: Why do we have to turn this into ePenis measuring contest ? I'm from EU, but most of my favorite players have origins in the NA server - KiwiKaki, Huk, InControl, IdrA, Day[9], Arthritis, Tasteless, djWheat, miniWheat, qxc, Machine and CatZ, just to name a few. EU players might be better, in some cases, but the names that stand out for me from the EU region are ... TLO, Jinro, Haypro, Ret, DeMuslim, Mondragon and Grubby. And I'm really struggling to figure out more names that I really enjoy watching. Yes, of course, there are Nama, Mana, Mama and Sjow, but ... they're not exactly that sort of attention grabbers as most of the NA players. So which server is better ? Who cares really ? Both are behind the Korean. Really no White-ra, Dimaga or Socke ?  | ||
|
Rantech
Chile527 Posts
| ||
|
mindspike
Canada1902 Posts
On February 10 2011 04:12 eXwOn wrote: I disagree. At the tip toppity top you don't always get matched with people of your skill, due to lack of people at your level. This leads to the 3:1 w:l ratios that aren't uncommon. Huk has a 67% ratio as the #1 on EU ladder so it is uncommon. | ||
|
Pervect
1280 Posts
On February 10 2011 04:11 Striding Strider wrote: A better question would be: Why does Sweden produce such good players? Nerf Sweden Blizz, this is getting ridiculous | ||
|
arew
Lithuania1861 Posts
| ||
|
eXwOn
Canada351 Posts
On February 10 2011 04:26 mindspike wrote: Huk has a 67% ratio as the #1 on EU ladder so it is uncommon. Didn't HuK have a 3:1 ratio on NA though? | ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
| ||
|
Hipster
United States57 Posts
On February 10 2011 03:53 rauk wrote: i think europe has always had a greater number of high skilled players in every single esports game, not just sc2. pretty much all the good international 1.6 teams, quake, wc3, bw, pk, etc players have been from europe. however, i think in terms of peak skill between europe and the US+canada they're probably about the same, except for 1.6. quake? bw? come on now :p pretty much rapha > all and idra/nony in bw. | ||
|
The_Piper42
United States426 Posts
| ||
|
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
it's like in poker we said americans were smarter and asians stupid cuz americans>europeans>asians in terms of results | ||
|
Deleted User 61629
1664 Posts
| ||
| ||
