Boxer to GSL2 (probably) - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ddod
Bulgaria144 Posts
| ||
|
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
I love it. | ||
|
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
| ||
|
Darksoldierr
Hungary2014 Posts
| ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
![]() when thats said: GSL2 should be pretty good, hope more Foreginers try to qualify this time ![]() | ||
|
QuixoticO
Netherlands810 Posts
| ||
|
Misanthrope
United States924 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + EPIIIIIIIIC | ||
|
Slakter
Sweden1947 Posts
| ||
|
Shizuru~
Malaysia1676 Posts
Manofoneway is such an awesome name. | ||
|
Necosarius
Sweden4042 Posts
![]() | ||
|
seksn
Germany15 Posts
| ||
|
drlame
Sweden574 Posts
| ||
|
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
Boxer's play rely much on harrass, innovative idea and game decision. Before at SC1, if he harrass very well, or play some tactics that surprise his opponent, and get them some-how out of syn, he would win the game. But in SC2, things are dumbed down alot, marco is a cake walk now so even if you get distracted or surprised by your opponent, you can still macro out a formidable army. I think many lesser players now can have a chance against the Emperor in SC2, they would have zero chance in SC1 though. | ||
|
stafu
Australia1196 Posts
What? Marine said he heard a shield? What? 100/100 nucleus called? What? Overload is blind? | ||
|
Nihilnovi
Sweden696 Posts
| ||
|
Dingotrold
Denmark622 Posts
| ||
|
scooterTech
Australia44 Posts
| ||
|
optical630
United Kingdom768 Posts
sc2.. oh shi- | ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
| ||
|
BCH
Philippines88 Posts
![]() | ||
| ||


