EPT
Tournament winners since release - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
liaf
Norway318 Posts
| ||
|
Hazo
Canada2 Posts
| ||
|
Luvz
Norway356 Posts
| ||
|
starhunk
Canada84 Posts
| ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
On September 14 2010 01:34 starhunk wrote: lol stats are funny... especially when you pick and choose only 2 zergs to put in your data.. Idra has a more than 1 gold medal.. and you admitted to one in the king of beta, but he isn't on the list. Hey check out the thread title... | ||
|
Ryps
Romania2740 Posts
This is comparable to the terran domination in SC BW when there were alot of terrans until Chojja, july, savior came. | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
But the numbers are pretty sick | ||
|
deo.deo
135 Posts
It clearly shows an imbalance towards terran there is just no way to argue that. No one is saying that terran's are less skilled or anything but with the tools they are given they are just ahead and that's a clear fact. There are only a few tournaments with not at least two to three terrans in the semi-finals. | ||
|
jamesr12
United States1549 Posts
O and just another way of showing poor zergs... Where'd you get all the info liquipedia? | ||
|
Haplo_33
Sweden383 Posts
| ||
|
Zaxro
United States261 Posts
EDIT: Ah someone beat to the name part. Didn't see it as it was posted while I was typing this. | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
In SC 2 I have a feeling all the maps are very similiar but maybe the game is just very new after all and we no shit yet.. ;D | ||
|
cuppatea
United Kingdom1401 Posts
I was originally going to include players with only 2nd place finishes but I would have had to add another 20+ names (of which Idra was one, due to his 2nd at IEM) and I ran out of steam. Maybe I'll update it when I have time. | ||
|
ryanAnger
United States838 Posts
On September 14 2010 01:35 Haplo_33 wrote: to starhunk and other complaining about a lack of IdrA. Look at the title. Winners sinse RELEASE. King of beta obviously does not qualify as it was over before the release. You have to forgive that most people have the reading comprehension of a Goldfish with no eyes. | ||
|
DarkShadowz
Sweden321 Posts
| ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21247 Posts
| ||
|
cuppatea
United Kingdom1401 Posts
On September 14 2010 01:29 slained wrote: Its LefNaij, its "i" Iefnaij Thanks, I've changed it. | ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
| ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On September 14 2010 01:29 TurpinOS wrote: Hope this was sarcastic, if you really think that the stat shows anything at all on the balance I dont know what to say. (im not debating if there is a balance problem or not here, but that stats without knowing the amount of players of each race doesnt prove nothing at all) Actually it shows a ton about balance, and it is more so a determining factor than the amount of players playing each race. Especially because we already know the global numbers, anyways. And Zerg is around ~20% played I believe. If you want to get to "out of that 20%, very few make it to the high ranks in the first place to participate in such tournies," then you're already finding yourself back at a balance discussion. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On September 14 2010 01:37 ryanAnger wrote: You have to forgive that most people have the reading comprehension of a Goldfish with no eyes. More like oysters with no eyes... they (mostly Terran players lol) have sturdy defensive exteriors and then when they open their mouths bullshit starts spewing out left and right. Go figure. I think the stats are a bit funny, and I did at least smile when I saw the race breakdown. Idk if that's a clear imbalance but I think something needs to change on the mapmaking front or Zerg needs more appeal at higher levels? I'm sure good players just aren't interested in Zerg... this has close to nothing to do with imbalance. | ||
| ||
