EPTfail blizz is fail.
Patch 4 (boring :() - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Unlisked
India28 Posts
fail blizz is fail. | ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21550 Posts
On March 06 2010 14:29 Unlisked wrote: ROFL! fail blizz is fail. Please don't ever post like this again. | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
|
t3tsubo
Canada682 Posts
| ||
|
LaughingTulkas
United States1107 Posts
| ||
|
Khalleb
Canada1909 Posts
| ||
|
andiCR
Costa Rica2273 Posts
| ||
GTR
51507 Posts
do betas of games even need classification? | ||
|
NeoValkyrion
United States27 Posts
| ||
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On March 06 2010 14:47 Zelniq wrote: i remember they used to do these contentless patches in wc3 when they'd do stealth things like update Warden to get rid of hackers imo any time they find a new way to detect hacks they should leave it in for like a week and then permanently ban everyone that hacked. | ||
|
tec27
United States3702 Posts
On March 06 2010 14:51 -orb- wrote: imo any time they find a new way to detect hacks they should leave it in for like a week and then permanently ban everyone that hacked. Its not really finding a new way of detecting hacks, its just basically adding more offsets to be scanned by warden. And warden already operates in a way such that it is hard to tell what exactly triggered your ban (IE: it waits til a certain predetermined time and bans everyone who was caught prior to that). | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9105 Posts
On March 06 2010 13:36 Dyno. wrote: mothership reduced to 50 hp and 50 shields, vortex removed. also its energy is capped at 1 less than is needed to cast mass recall calling it First I read you post and was thinking "what?" Then I re-read it and was like, oohhhh lool. You'd think they would waid to include this dinky change in a future patch. I guess the "game rating information" is important for legality or something along those lines perhaps. | ||
| ||
