EPTOn November 09 2014 01:21 MapleLeafSirup wrote:
Really, Neuer? -_-
http://gfycat.com/BruisedDangerousErmine
Really, Neuer? -_-
http://gfycat.com/BruisedDangerousErmine
"Not bad" - Thomas Schaaf
2014 - 2015 Football Thread - Page 348
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Micro_Jackson
Germany2002 Posts
"Not bad" - Thomas Schaaf | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On November 09 2014 01:21 MapleLeafSirup wrote: Really, Neuer? -_- http://gfycat.com/BruisedDangerousErmine #NeuerForBallonDor | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On November 09 2014 02:40 zev318 wrote: how was that QPR goal not a goal? I think they said Hart double touched the free kick (which he did, it was really weird). Except I thought a double touch was an indirect free kick the other way, not a retake. Have to check the laws again. | ||
|
Pantagruel
United States1427 Posts
| ||
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
| ||
|
Pantagruel
United States1427 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
On November 09 2014 02:43 Pantagruel wrote: What utter buffoonery by the official... The very least it should be indirect free-kick to QPR there. Crazy to give Hart a mulligan for that... Yeah directly from the laws of the game: For a FK taken by a goalkeeper: "If, after the ball is in play the goalkeeper touches the ball again (except with his hands), before it has touched another player: An indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team, to be taken from the place where the infringement occurred." | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34173 Posts
| ||
|
malcram
2752 Posts
not offside? | ||
|
Pantagruel
United States1427 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
| ||
|
Faruko
Chile34173 Posts
| ||
|
malcram
2752 Posts
| ||
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
malcram
2752 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
| ||
