EPTwhaat the fuck?????
I knew pacer are struggling mightly on offense as of late. O_O
NBA Playoffs 2013-2014 - Page 3
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
DMXD
United States4064 Posts
whaat the fuck????? I knew pacer are struggling mightly on offense as of late. O_O | ||
|
hootsushi
Germany3468 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
DMXD
United States4064 Posts
gonan be really hard for the pacer to come back with their flat offense. ok, this game is over. 20 points lead with only 6 minutes left in the game. | ||
|
hootsushi
Germany3468 Posts
| ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19343 Posts
On April 20 2014 10:20 hootsushi wrote: I have to ask: Is it just me or does Stephenson totally look like Chris Tucker? lol wat? do you even understand the words coming out of my mouth? | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16055 Posts
On April 19 2014 22:22 RowdierBob wrote: Leastern: Pacers > Hawks 4-0 (easiest choice of the first round) lol wut? | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
LOL | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
| ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
ATL was actually a 47% dog in the matchup before game 1. Indy is the most likely team to lose in round 1 as a top seed. | ||
|
hootsushi
Germany3468 Posts
On April 20 2014 11:14 icystorage wrote: lol wat? do you even understand the words coming out of my mouth? I see what you did there. Also, OKC only team who won at home :D | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia12901 Posts
4-1's the same as 4-0, right? | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia12901 Posts
Why, when viewers tuned in to Game 1 of Clippers-Warriors on ABC, did they see Blake Griffin for just four minutes in the first half? The same reason Andre Iguodala sat extended stretches and Chris Paul also missed time: foul trouble. Why should an overeager trio of referees rob fans of the stars they want to see? That's the trouble with players fouling out. If each additional foul after six resulted in a technical foul rather than disqualification, coaches could keep key players on the floor, while players would still be punished for hacking away. I think this idea has some legs. It's never good when games are influenced so heavily by foul problems. Do you think this could work? | ||
|
LuMiX
China5757 Posts
| ||
|
Akka
France291 Posts
On April 20 2014 22:18 RowdierBob wrote: Can't stand the collective moaning coming from ESPN's LA writers now but this is interesting (per Kevin Pelton): I think this idea has some legs. It's never good when games are influenced so heavily by foul problems. Do you think this could work? Maybe they should remove all the rules that make basketball a competitive sport and turn each game into an all-star game kind of show :p | ||
|
FakePseudo
Belgium716 Posts
On April 20 2014 23:16 Akka wrote: Maybe they should remove all the rules that make basketball a competitive sport and turn each game into an all-star game kind of show :p agree. Couldn't stand the casters rant during the game about that point. Especially since they just made a good point on how iguy is a smart two way and away from the ball player who should know his value and thus not gamble so stupidly on a strip. G S G!!!!!!!!!! And....we begin with a static possession into a contested airballed 3 | ||
| ||
