|
On May 21 2014 10:59 slyboogie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 10:01 Vindicare605 wrote:On May 21 2014 10:00 Doraemon wrote:On May 21 2014 09:37 Vindicare605 wrote:
The internet is hilarious. Mallory Edens (the mega cute Bucks daughter) is trending on Twitter. There's more people talking about her than the fucking lottery. she is hot though. same with the kings daughter. god damn Mallory Edens to me is cute. Fine as fuck, but not hot. Kings daughter is more what I consider hot. They are two different but equal kinds of attractiveness. At some point I'll have to figure out a way to describe exactly the difference between the two that makes sense to anyone but me, but today is not that day. What is the difference between cute, "fine as fuck," and hot? Please frame your answer using super famous people.
"Fine as fuck" in this case is a neutral comment, it's another way of saying "extremely attractive."
A person can be extremely attractive but look very different from another person who is also considered to be extremely attractive.
So. An example of someone that's very attractive in a "Hot" way would be someone like Megan Fox or Kate Beckinsale.
An example of someone very attractive but in a "cute" way would be in this case Mallory Edens or someone else like Amy Adams or Kate Upton.
It's very subjective and everyone is going to have their own definition of what qualifies someone for either or, my only argument is that there is definitely a difference between someone that's cute and someone that's hot. Not that one is better than the other, just that they are appealing for different reasons.
|
On May 21 2014 11:19 red_ wrote:
I'd say Bosh is regressing to the mean but he's legitimately a solid 3 point shooter, no idea why he can't even find the rim on shots in this series.
Also, is this the first game ever when "Lance Got This!" is a good thing?
Bosh had like 20-25 more lbs of muscle when he played in Toronto.
|
|
|
We should call that play Rock the Baby.
|
Really looking forward to this year's draft, looks like nothing is set in stone after the top 3.
|
On May 21 2014 18:28 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Really looking forward to this year's draft, looks like nothing is set in stone after the top 3.
Pelican tears.
|
|
|
Holy shit that's not good.  Poor Paul George. Pacers are screwed if he's gone for game 3.
|
I guess Wade's knee flared up.
|
On May 21 2014 19:59 TwoToneTerran wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 18:28 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Really looking forward to this year's draft, looks like nothing is set in stone after the top 3. Pelican tears.
I don't think anyone expected us to get a top 5 pick anyway which is what we needed to not give it to Philly since the pick from the Holiday trade was top-5 protected. It's sad that the Cavs have gotten 3 of the last 4 number 1 picks though. I'm just glad we snuck one in there especially since it was the year Anthony Davis was on the board.
|
On May 22 2014 01:59 o29 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 19:59 TwoToneTerran wrote:On May 21 2014 18:28 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Really looking forward to this year's draft, looks like nothing is set in stone after the top 3. Pelican tears. I don't think anyone expected us to get a top 5 pick anyway which is what we needed to not give it to Philly since the pick from the Holiday trade was top-5 protected. It's sad that the Cavs have gotten 3 of the last 4 number 1 picks though. I'm just glad we snuck one in there especially since it was the year Anthony Davis was on the board.
Everything looks like less of a big deal with Anthony Davis on your team but squandering away all your assets is the best way to lose Anthony Davis in the future.
|
Well it does remain to be seen if Noel+whoever the 6ers draft will be better than Jrue.
Detroit were the real big losers of this draft though.
|
not missing much if hes gonna play like he did in g2
|
On May 22 2014 02:08 TwoToneTerran wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 01:59 o29 wrote:On May 21 2014 19:59 TwoToneTerran wrote:On May 21 2014 18:28 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Really looking forward to this year's draft, looks like nothing is set in stone after the top 3. Pelican tears. I don't think anyone expected us to get a top 5 pick anyway which is what we needed to not give it to Philly since the pick from the Holiday trade was top-5 protected. It's sad that the Cavs have gotten 3 of the last 4 number 1 picks though. I'm just glad we snuck one in there especially since it was the year Anthony Davis was on the board. Everything looks like less of a big deal with Anthony Davis on your team but squandering away all your assets is the best way to lose Anthony Davis in the future.
they still have a pretty good team unless someones about to leave via free agency
looks like they have their top5 signed for 3 years together so theyll have a chance to see what they can do
|
On May 22 2014 02:08 TwoToneTerran wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 01:59 o29 wrote:On May 21 2014 19:59 TwoToneTerran wrote:On May 21 2014 18:28 zulu_nation8 wrote:
Really looking forward to this year's draft, looks like nothing is set in stone after the top 3. Pelican tears. I don't think anyone expected us to get a top 5 pick anyway which is what we needed to not give it to Philly since the pick from the Holiday trade was top-5 protected. It's sad that the Cavs have gotten 3 of the last 4 number 1 picks though. I'm just glad we snuck one in there especially since it was the year Anthony Davis was on the board. Everything looks like less of a big deal with Anthony Davis on your team but squandering away all your assets is the best way to lose Anthony Davis in the future.
What do you mean? If you're referring to trading our 2013 and 2014 1st rounders for Jrue Holiday, then sure you could speculate whether or not that was a good move. Looking at it now, Nerlens Noel (injured all season) and our #10 pick this year for a fringe all-star PG doesn't sound like that bad of a trade. It's all speculation though since Noel and our 10th pick this year are still big question marks.
Regardless, players very rarely leave after their initial rookie contract since the team they signed with can pay them significantly more than anyone else. So at worst, he'll resign for another 4-5 year deal, giving us another ~7 years to build a roster around him. Moves like the Jrue trade likely won't be relevant at that point, but yeah hopefully we don't trade away any other assets, though Ryan Anderson is the only contract that I really want us to hold onto. Tyreke is nice, but at $11M/year, we're slightly overpaying so he's definitely tradeable if the right deal comes along.
|
tyreke evans played pretty well towards the end of the season when he started, when him and holiday are both healthy it could be a good backcourt.
|
On May 22 2014 04:21 zulu_nation8 wrote:
tyreke evans played pretty well towards the end of the season when he started, when him and holiday are both healthy it could be a good backcourt.
Very true.
I'm a little nervous though because those numbers were as a starter. His numbers coming off the bench were a lot more pedestrian. I think we need to start Tyreke at SG and move Gordon to the bench, but Gordon has already stated that he doesn't like the idea. You'd think he would be more open to whatever since he's being grossly overpaid and coming off the bench reduces his chances of being injured again.
We really need to move Gordon, but I don't think any GM is dumb enough to take him.
|
What do you guys think about the Pacers/Heat series? Was game 1 a fluke? What will it take to get Lebron to start playing at 100%? Pacers might have won last game if George hadn't been so off.
|
I heard some rumors about the Lakers and Gordon, hope it doesn't happen.
And as for Pacers/Heat, I was actually a little impressed with the Heat last night. As someone with a slightly-over 65% win rate for these playoffs (unsustainable and yes I am gloating), the biggest thing I was looking at was how the Heat responded. I had the Heat winning in my book last night but I mostly wanted to see how tired they looked, how they battled through those tough times, etcetera.
After the first game, I thought the Heat looked a little tired (3 finals in row, it is only natural) and depending on how they looked in game 2, I was gonna either really think the Pacers had an advantage or that the Heat just had a bad game. But after game 2, I think it will be a long series with the Heat winning game 3.
edit:As of right now I would still say the Pacers in 6 or 7, but also depends on PG and how the next game goes.
|
On May 22 2014 04:03 zev318 wrote:not missing much if hes gonna play like he did in g2
well it happened right before heat took the lead...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
