EPTThe LiquidLegends Lounge - Page 361
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12084 Posts
Wrynn is a great card for face or some minion heavy midrange Warrior, if my suspicion of his interaction with battlecries is correct (it won't proc them). Neither Control Warrior nor Patron Warrior will want it, most likely, as finishers. Patron Warrior for obvious reasons (it's a combo deck, you don't want to burn combo pieces early), and Control Warrior doesn't want it because 1) Too slow against aggro/midrange (10 mana?!?!?!), 2) Control Warrior packs a lot of essential battlecries (Cruel Task, Shield Maiden, Alexstraza, 5-mana tech legendaries, BGH, etc), which Wrynn probably negates, and 3) the deck does NOT want to overextend on board in the major control matchups (vs Handlock and Control Warrior in particular) If battlecries are procced, then you may see it in control (it would be bonkers in that case). As is, not control warrior material. Rhonin is designed for tempo/flamewaker mage but ehhhhh: 8-mana legendaries are not particularly great for a tempo deck, especially one which is 7 attack, in a deck which generally dodges BGH. Then again, the purpose of the card is to die and give you 3 flamewaker/antonidas/malygos activators, so hrm. You'll probably see it in some flamewaker tempo decks, despite it being slow, and malygos mages. Hunter card is conditional Unstable Portal. Ewww. pls no. | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
On August 13 2015 02:06 mordek wrote: #cubicleproblems Just cut back on the alcohol and I'm sure you'll get results right away :D yeah like 1600 kcal per bottle x 3 a week zzzzz | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On August 13 2015 02:35 Lord Tolkien wrote: + Show Spoiler [HS stuff] + Wrynn is a great card for face or some minion heavy midrange Warrior, if my suspicion of his interaction with battlecries is correct (it won't proc them). Neither Control Warrior nor Patron Warrior will want it, most likely, as finishers. Patron Warrior for obvious reasons (it's a combo deck, you don't want to burn combo pieces early), and Control Warrior doesn't want it because 1) Too slow against aggro/midrange (10 mana?!?!?!), 2) Control Warrior packs a lot of essential battlecries (Cruel Task, Shield Maiden, Alexstraza, 5-mana tech legendaries, BGH, etc), which Wrynn probably negates, and 3) the deck does NOT want to overextend on board in the major control matchups (vs Handlock and Control Warrior in particular) If battlecries are procced, then you may see it in control (it would be bonkers in that case). As is, not control warrior material. Rhonin is designed for tempo/flamewaker mage but ehhhhh: 8-mana legendaries are not particularly great for a tempo deck, especially one which is 7 attack, in a deck which generally dodges BGH. Then again, the purpose of the card is to die and give you 3 flamewaker/antonidas/malygos activators, so hrm. You'll probably see it in some flamewaker tempo decks, despite it being slow, and malygos mages. Hunter card is conditional Unstable Portal. Ewww. pls no. They probably want Wrynn to be played with a bunch of Taunt cards if their other Warrior cards are any indication. | ||
|
Cixah
United States11285 Posts
Is this Yellow 3D remake thing real? I keep seeing screenshots and shit on facebook but to places I don't see as reliable. Thoughts? | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
also captain phasma is a lame name but being played by Gwendoline Christie is a cool gig | ||
|
Cixah
United States11285 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On August 13 2015 02:45 Cixah wrote: Pokemon Nerds, Is this Yellow 3D remake thing real? I keep seeing screenshots and shit on facebook but to places I don't see as reliable. Thoughts? IDK where you're seeing this, everything I'm finding for it is dated in the range of 3/31-4/2, which makes it meaningless. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On August 13 2015 02:45 Cixah wrote: Pokemon Nerds, Is this Yellow 3D remake thing real? I keep seeing screenshots and shit on facebook but to places I don't see as reliable. Thoughts? My rule is if it isn't on serebii to not believe it. Don't see the point of a Yellow remake anyway unless Mew is obtainable in it. Even then, played through Kanto too many times for me to care about a remake. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12084 Posts
On August 13 2015 02:40 Requizen wrote: They probably want Wrynn to be played with a bunch of Taunt cards if their other Warrior cards are any indication. + Show Spoiler + Still won't be wallet warrior; would be some odd midrange warrior, but not control (losing battlecries and high probability of overextend is bad, bad, bad for control). Wrynn's best combo is actually with charge minions, ala face warrior. Wyrnn may birth some new warrior archetypes, but I'm fairly certain it won't make it into a current control decklist w/ alexstraza or shieldmaidens and whatnot. Again, doesn't help against aggro, doesn't help against midrange that much, and against control, it can spectacularly backfire when they board clear. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I knew the overall outline going into it. Frieza getting revived and then killed at the end. I had heard that this movie would be Vegeta's time to shine. Goku would be defeated and Vegeta would get his chance to kill the big bad. First, the way Goku gets defeated is bullshit as fuck. He's fighting Frieza and has him on the ropes, then one of Frieza's dinky henchmen shoots Goku with a ring worn ray gun that knocks him out of whatever state he's in the leeches off of super saiyan god. Why does that piddly shit basically incapacitate what is one of the 5 strongest being in the universe? It makes 0 fucking sense. So now that Goku is down for the count, Vegeta comes in to fight the already severely weakened Frieza. Instead of Frieza pulling some bullshit and fucking up Krillan to take the last sensu bean and make a fight out of it, Vegeta has maybe 5 minutes of fight time against an opponent that clearly had no ability to compete. There's no tension, no concern about how well he can match up because Vegeta is eternally weaker than goku. But the worst part, the worst fucking part, is the ending. Right before Vegeta is going to kill him, Frieza goes full dick mode and blows up the planet. Only the main characters minus Vegeta get saved on a small piece of drifting firmament by Whis putting up a barrier and then rewinds time 3 minutes, because for some reason he can do that like it's no biggy. Now instead of Vegeta being caught off guard, Goku kills Frieza before he can blow the planet up. Goku's defeat was jank as fuck and in the end didn't even matter because "magic beans lol" and Vegeta didn't even get to off Frieza. The movie would have been far better off being 10-15 minutes longer and having a proper Vegeta v Frieza fight. The Frieza fight is supposed to be the focus of the movie and it entirely dropped the dragonball. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12084 Posts
On August 13 2015 03:39 Gahlo wrote: Saw "DBZ: Resurrection" F last night, gripe in the spoiler. + Show Spoiler + I knew the overall outline going into it. Frieza getting revived and then killed at the end. I had heard that this movie would be Vegeta's time to shine. Goku would be defeated and Vegeta would get his chance to kill the big bad. First, the way Goku gets defeated is bullshit as fuck. He's fighting Frieza and has him on the ropes, then one of Frieza's dinky henchmen shoots Goku with a ring worn ray gun that knocks him out of whatever state he's in the leeches off of super saiyan god. Why does that piddly shit basically incapacitate what is one of the 5 strongest being in the universe? It makes 0 fucking sense. So now that Goku is down for the count, Vegeta comes in to fight the already severely weakened Frieza. Instead of Frieza pulling some bullshit and fucking up Krillan to take the last sensu bean and make a fight out of it, Vegeta has maybe 5 minutes of fight time against an opponent that clearly had no ability to compete. There's no tension, no concern about how well he can match up because Vegeta is eternally weaker than goku. But the worst part, the worst fucking part, is the ending. Right before Vegeta is going to kill him, Frieza goes full dick mode and blows up the planet. Only the main characters minus Vegeta get saved on a small piece of drifting firmament by Whis putting up a barrier and then rewinds time 3 minutes, because for some reason he can do that like it's no biggy. Now instead of Vegeta being caught off guard, Goku kills Frieza before he can blow the planet up. Goku's defeat was jank as fuck and in the end didn't even matter because "magic beans lol" and Vegeta didn't even get to off Frieza. The movie would have been far better off being 10-15 minutes longer and having a proper Vegeta v Frieza fight. The Frieza fight is supposed to be the focus of the movie and it entirely dropped the dragonball. Dude, just watch DBZ abridged. You won't be sorry. | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
Those eight were pretty hateful. H Y P E B O Y S | ||
|
Ketara
United States15065 Posts
On August 13 2015 02:39 ComaDose wrote: seriously no love for the cut like a fucking teppanyaki pinapple joke? My 8 year old tour guide didn't get any love either. OT is jerks. | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
On August 13 2015 03:39 Gahlo wrote: dropped the dragonball hehehe I SAID NICE PICS KETARA! | ||
|
Eppa!
Sweden4641 Posts
On August 13 2015 03:45 Ketara wrote: My 8 year old tour guide didn't get any love either. OT is jerks. @Coma I don't know what that is @Ketara I am not as "in" to 8 year olds as you. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On August 13 2015 03:45 Lord Tolkien wrote: Dude, just watch DBZ abridged. You won't be sorry. Couple years late to tell me that. | ||
| ||
