EPTThe LiquidLegends Lounge - Page 157
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
TheEmulator
28103 Posts
Yeah I discovered him about a year ago. Some great stuff. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On July 02 2015 10:26 Requizen wrote: Hm should I join mafia last minute? Already started. You had like 3 weeks dude | ||
|
Cixah
United States11285 Posts
My phone is much to strong at mafia. | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12084 Posts
| ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
| ||
|
TheHumanSensation
Canada1210 Posts
On July 02 2015 03:35 Requizen wrote: Yeah, but dusting him could give me Dr Boom, who is probably better in all of those situations, no? I haven't really seen Toshley in any decks other than Mech decks or those ever-popular Spart Part Antonidas decks. Dr. Boom is better than Toshley in basically every scenario, yeah. Depending on just how badly you're hurting though I'd recommend both if able. I didn't notice it was golden though, so Toshley -> Boom is a good straight-up trade if you don't care for golden cards. On July 02 2015 04:38 Alaric wrote: Toshley has a threat to end the game? How that, because of the generic "solid body for the cost" thing? I don't remember him being that scary on board. 5 attack isn't much of a step down from 6 these days (ie not many 6hp minions in play). It's basically a better Boulderfist Ogre. It's generic big body ofc, but in the scenario where it's an available legendary it defs has it's place in basically any budget deck that'd normally run bouderfist ogre. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12084 Posts
Granted, the bombs still trades favorably, but it's a 4 mana tempo loss. | ||
|
Amarok
Australia2003 Posts
If I didn't own Boom/Sylvannis it wouldn't even be a question. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On July 02 2015 14:52 Lord Tolkien wrote: Boom dies to BGH. Every midrange and control deck has BGH for Boom, and why some decks don't run Boom because they can dodge BGH. Granted, the bombs still trades favorably, but it's a 4 mana tempo loss. Doesn't Boom dying to BGH mean your other 7+ threats are not safer? It never feels like a huge lose to lose boom to BGH unless he can clear bots before playing BGH on an empty board. Feel that's kind of the strength of Boom in that even the unfavorable trades aren't that bad. Toshley is super legit I feel. It's just that most decks don't really have the slots to use him in. The 6 mana slot is getting very close to the issues 7+ mana slots have in that they often take up your whole turn so if you putting one in it has to have some kind of bonus effect. That's why you only really see Slyv/Emp/Shieldmadien/Highmane these days with an odd Sky golem in pally. I think if the meta slowed down you'd see more Toshley. | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12084 Posts
If you are planning on running several threats over 7 attack, Boom is a great card. If you aren't running 7 attack+ threats, it becomes much less desirable, since you're very likely to lose it against a common mid/control tech card (and boom is not a good card against aggro). Sure the outcome isn't bad, but compared to say a Loatheb which won't die to bgh and has a very strong, consistent effect (which can shut down some decks if played correctly), or tech cards like Harrison, a deck without 7+ attack creatures should gloss over Boom. Basic opportunity cost. Toshley is 1) random 2) only really benefits flamewaker mage, which is generally more aggressive and doesn't have room, really, for Toshley | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
Basically Toshley is too slow and too easily removed for his impact. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
Go to AskReddit and find some popular questions that aren't completely stupid. You can use these to spark conversation with your date if you don't have anything to say. | ||
|
Eppa!
Sweden4641 Posts
On July 02 2015 23:26 Requizen wrote: Req Date Tip #23: Go to AskReddit and find some popular questions that aren't completely stupid. You can use these to spark conversation with your date if you don't have anything to say. Maybe you should ask questions that interest you about a person rather than: Other than sex and urination, what do you use your genitals for? What sounds like it's really nice but isn't? What movie created within 2000-2015 will be considered a classic in the future? | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On July 02 2015 23:37 Eppa! wrote: Why is it so god damn hot?!? I don't have an AC or a fan and I can't walk around naked outside. FML. Maybe you should ask questions that interest you about a person rather than: Other than sex and urination, what do you use your genitals for? What sounds like it's really nice but isn't? What movie created within 2000-2015 will be considered a classic in the future? I picked "You have $10 to buy groceries to make dinner for you and a date, what do you get?", and we discussed what was feasible and tasty, then made plans to do just that when we moved in together. I think it went reasonably well, bruv. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
Now I feel like I can do whatever the hell I want to with dust from now on. On July 02 2015 23:41 Requizen wrote: I picked "You have $10 to buy groceries to make dinner for you and a date, what do you get?", and we discussed what was feasible and tasty, then made plans to do just that when we moved in together. I think it went reasonably well, bruv. Wildly different situations when you're discussing that with a finance vs. a random date. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
I mean, I think Ender's Game is still a gem of science fiction writing and coming of age stories, but in the future will young people still read it? My sister is a teacher and she said she already has high school kids who haven't read or watched Harry Potter and think it's out of style, while people from our generation (or older!) consider it nearly essential reading. It's just interesting to think about, and probably decent date discussion material. | ||
| ||
