Off-Topic General Discussion - Page 4982

On May 14 2015 04:10 mordek wrote:
Piccolo is my favorite.

I just browsed his moves and couldn't find anything about the time he sends out shots all over and the enemy dodges them all and the shots stay suspended in air and the enemy gloats but then Piccolo is like oh wait, they're all going to collapse on you, glhf I'm a BA pce l8 and my 10 year old self was like awwwww yeahhhhh

On May 14 2015 05:52 Eppa! wrote:
With overwatch I am going with the heroes route, if people say it sucks when its released I won't play it.

Do you guys actually play SG when your not streaming or what? I haven't play anything other than story and practice (online is scary).

On May 14 2015 05:55 Parnage wrote:
Did they give a payment model for overwatch yet?

On May 14 2015 05:42 sung_moon wrote:


Hellzone Grenade? In the DBZ games, that was the Ultimate when you won the rock/paper/scissors thing.

Today's episode was pretty good. Can't wait for super cocky SSJ Vegeta to bust out the Time Chamber and face Cell soon.

"YOU! NAMEKIAN! TOO STRONG! EXPLAIN NOW!"

Vegeta- "The fuqqs a kami?!"
Krillin- "Basically God...."
V- "BUT I'M STILL HERE!?"
Trunks- "Do you really believe your own hype that much?"
V- " I AM DA HYPE"

That episode was great.

On May 14 2015 05:57 Ryuu314 wrote:
I can't imagine it'd be anything other than f2p with microtransactions to buy characters and skins.

On May 14 2015 06:03 ComaDose wrote:
even if you make a bad game people will buy it, blizzard knows, they released diablo like it was with that payment model. then they added a pay to win model and people kept buying it.

On May 14 2015 06:01 Parnage wrote:


Please no. I'm so sick of being nickel'd for content, Just let it be a 60$ fucking game for once. If you make a good game, people will buy it.

On May 14 2015 06:06 Slayer91 wrote:


More people will play it if it's free.
The people with no money won't spend but they can enjoy the game and keep it active. People with money to spare will spend it.
I think it's a good system. Instead of denying poorer people you let people who are only going to buy dumb shit with their money anyway buy stupid skins and such which take resources to make so its awkward to charge a flat amount when you can't predict the games success.
Look at how long Starcraft lasted and blizzard made only the money off people rebuying it after the first few years.

On May 14 2015 06:07 jcarlsoniv wrote:


I'm all for buying skins and stuff. But I'm getting pretty sick of having to continually purchase and/or unlock characters.

I'm with Parnage - would prefer one price for all character content.

On May 14 2015 06:07 jcarlsoniv wrote:


I'm all for buying skins and stuff. But I'm getting pretty sick of having to continually purchase and/or unlock characters.

I'm with Parnage - would prefer one price for all character content.

On May 14 2015 06:05 AsmodeusXI wrote:


Then they took it out and added more stuff for a fixed rate and the game got 100000x better.

They might learn.

They might not.

Who's to say?

On May 14 2015 06:07 jcarlsoniv wrote:


I'm all for buying skins and stuff. But I'm getting pretty sick of having to continually purchase and/or unlock characters.

I'm with Parnage - would prefer one price for all character content. That was a big thing Hi-Rez did right with Smite, imo

On May 14 2015 06:18 onlywonderboy wrote:

This pls. I'd much rather pay full price for all the relative content and just have skins be the microtransaction. People would bitch Dota 2 is free with that model but I've really soured on that business model.

On May 14 2015 06:08 AsmodeusXI wrote:


Like Hi-Rez's awesome Smite deal.

What a great move that was.

If only I ever rewarded their kindness by playing their game.