EPTOff-Topic General Discussion - Page 4982
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
sung_moon
United States10110 Posts
On May 14 2015 04:10 mordek wrote: Piccolo is my favorite. I just browsed his moves and couldn't find anything about the time he sends out shots all over and the enemy dodges them all and the shots stay suspended in air and the enemy gloats but then Piccolo is like oh wait, they're all going to collapse on you, glhf I'm a BA pce l8 and my 10 year old self was like awwwww yeahhhhh Hellzone Grenade? In the DBZ games, that was the Ultimate when you won the rock/paper/scissors thing. Today's episode was pretty good. Can't wait for super cocky SSJ Vegeta to bust out the Time Chamber and face Cell soon. "YOU! NAMEKIAN! TOO STRONG! EXPLAIN NOW!" Vegeta- "The fuqqs a kami?!" Krillin- "Basically God...." V- "BUT I'M STILL HERE!?" Trunks- "Do you really believe your own hype that much?" V- " I AM DA HYPE" That episode was great. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
btw http://www.polygon.com/2015/5/13/8601353/overwatch-gameplay-video-zenyatta | ||
|
Eppa!
Sweden4641 Posts
Do you guys actually play SG when your not streaming or what? I haven't play anything other than story and practice (online is scary). | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
| ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
| ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On May 14 2015 05:52 Eppa! wrote: With overwatch I am going with the heroes route, if people say it sucks when its released I won't play it. Do you guys actually play SG when your not streaming or what? I haven't play anything other than story and practice (online is scary). Occasionally, although not the last few days cuz I've been doing other stuff. Online is still scary for me too, and can get very disheartening very quickly. When I do play offline/solo, it's generally more in arcade or training so I can learn things. On May 14 2015 05:55 Parnage wrote: Did they give a payment model for overwatch yet? not to my knowledge | ||
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
On May 14 2015 05:42 sung_moon wrote: Hellzone Grenade? In the DBZ games, that was the Ultimate when you won the rock/paper/scissors thing. Today's episode was pretty good. Can't wait for super cocky SSJ Vegeta to bust out the Time Chamber and face Cell soon. "YOU! NAMEKIAN! TOO STRONG! EXPLAIN NOW!" Vegeta- "The fuqqs a kami?!" Krillin- "Basically God...." V- "BUT I'M STILL HERE!?" Trunks- "Do you really believe your own hype that much?" V- " I AM DA HYPE" That episode was great. Yeah, I guess that's it, the written description was lacking that I found but I just found the clip using that name  | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
On May 14 2015 05:57 Ryuu314 wrote: I can't imagine it'd be anything other than f2p with microtransactions to buy characters and skins. Please no. I'm so sick of being nickel'd for content, Just let it be a 60$ fucking game for once. If you make a good game, people will buy it. | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
| ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
| ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:03 ComaDose wrote: even if you make a bad game people will buy it, blizzard knows, they released diablo like it was with that payment model. then they added a pay to win model and people kept buying it. Then they took it out and added more stuff for a fixed rate and the game got 100000x better. They might learn. They might not. Who's to say? | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23460 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:01 Parnage wrote: Please no. I'm so sick of being nickel'd for content, Just let it be a 60$ fucking game for once. If you make a good game, people will buy it. More people will play it if it's free. The people with no money won't spend but they can enjoy the game and keep it active. People with money to spare will spend it. I think it's a good system. Instead of denying poorer people you let people who are only going to buy dumb shit with their money anyway buy stupid skins and such which take resources to make so its awkward to charge a flat amount when you can't predict the games success. Look at how long Starcraft lasted and blizzard made only the money off people rebuying it after the first few years. It sucks its pay2win but if its cosmetic and they actually make money off that shit then why not? (I still havent spent any money on league lol) | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:06 Slayer91 wrote: More people will play it if it's free. The people with no money won't spend but they can enjoy the game and keep it active. People with money to spare will spend it. I think it's a good system. Instead of denying poorer people you let people who are only going to buy dumb shit with their money anyway buy stupid skins and such which take resources to make so its awkward to charge a flat amount when you can't predict the games success. Look at how long Starcraft lasted and blizzard made only the money off people rebuying it after the first few years. I'm all for buying skins and stuff. But I'm getting pretty sick of having to continually purchase and/or unlock characters. I'm with Parnage - would prefer one price for all character content. That was a big thing Hi-Rez did right with Smite, imo | ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:07 jcarlsoniv wrote: I'm all for buying skins and stuff. But I'm getting pretty sick of having to continually purchase and/or unlock characters. I'm with Parnage - would prefer one price for all character content. Like Hi-Rez's awesome Smite deal. What a great move that was. If only I ever rewarded their kindness by playing their game. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:07 jcarlsoniv wrote: I'm all for buying skins and stuff. But I'm getting pretty sick of having to continually purchase and/or unlock characters. I'm with Parnage - would prefer one price for all character content. Yea if you want the free to play at least do it like smite did with the hero bundle. These other models are just annoying and greedy. | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:05 AsmodeusXI wrote: Then they took it out and added more stuff for a fixed rate and the game got 100000x better. They might learn. They might not. Who's to say? yeah i heard its better i'm just salty i paid $60 bucks when it came out and it was so lame. couldn't even connect for most of that day. another +1 for smites business model. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:07 jcarlsoniv wrote: I'm all for buying skins and stuff. But I'm getting pretty sick of having to continually purchase and/or unlock characters. I'm with Parnage - would prefer one price for all character content. That was a big thing Hi-Rez did right with Smite, imo This pls. I'd much rather pay full price for all the relative content and just have skins be the microtransaction. People would bitch Dota 2 is free with that model but I've really soured on that business model. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On May 14 2015 06:18 onlywonderboy wrote: This pls. I'd much rather pay full price for all the relative content and just have skins be the microtransaction. People would bitch Dota 2 is free with that model but I've really soured on that business model. On May 14 2015 06:08 AsmodeusXI wrote: Like Hi-Rez's awesome Smite deal. What a great move that was. If only I ever rewarded their kindness by playing their game. Sadly I don't see this happening though. I imagine they will make way more money off individual character sales if the game does indeed end up being F2P. Edit: I still suck at this website. | ||
| ||
