|
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On January 08 2015 02:00 Requizen wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. "Letting the terrorists win" is a pretty dumb concept imo. Risking further bloodshed and insulting an entire people just to spite a handful of extremists is a petty move on the whole. I'm all for freedom of speech, but if not printing Muhammad's is more polite and decreases the chances of further terrorist actions, then that seems like the more logical action, no?
no
|
On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win.
I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid.
|
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid.
no, it's absolutely hilarious
|
On January 08 2015 02:01 Scip wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:00 Requizen wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. "Letting the terrorists win" is a pretty dumb concept imo. Risking further bloodshed and insulting an entire people just to spite a handful of extremists is a petty move on the whole. I'm all for freedom of speech, but if not printing Muhammad's is more polite and decreases the chances of further terrorist actions, then that seems like the more logical action, no? no
You're so eloquent and present such well-developed discussions, you should write for a big company. Like Fox News.
|
On January 08 2015 02:00 Requizen wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. "Letting the terrorists win" is a pretty dumb concept imo. Risking further bloodshed and insulting an entire people just to spite a handful of extremists is a petty move on the whole. I'm all for freedom of speech, but if not printing Muhammad's is more polite and decreases the chances of further terrorist actions, then that seems like the more logical action, no?
If it was a Christian executing a group of people with beards because it offends him, we wouldn't say "no more beards", we'd say "get the fuck over it you retarded Christian". (intentional hyberbole)
I understand what you're saying, but I wholeheartedly disagree.
|
On January 08 2015 02:02 Scip wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid. no, it's absolutely hilarious
hurting others should probably not bring you joy tho
|
It doesn't decrease anything. What people don't understand is that there will always be extremists looking for an excuse to cause havoc. Removing what they use as that excuse now just means they will find something else. They crave something to be angry about, it validates their existence. Religion just happens to be an incredibly convenient tool for these psychopaths. The only real way I think you can stop it is by pushing education as much ad possible so these people find some other aspect of life to bury themselves in. Who knows if even that will work.
These people are sick. They require help but instead of getting it they latch on to things like religion and use it to fuel their problems.
|
On January 08 2015 02:04 Numy wrote:
It doesn't decrease anything. What people don't understand is that there will always be extremists looking for an excuse to cause havoc. Removing what they use as that excuse now just means they will find something else. They crave something to be angry about, it validates their existence. Religion just happens to be an incredibly convenient tool for these psychopaths. The only real way I think you can stop it is by pushing education as much ad possible so these people find some other aspect of life to bury themselves in. Who knows if even that will work.
I read yesterday that ISIS closed down an ass ton of schools in the middle east. They definitely know how to keep extremism going. =/
|
On January 08 2015 02:03 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:00 Requizen wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. "Letting the terrorists win" is a pretty dumb concept imo. Risking further bloodshed and insulting an entire people just to spite a handful of extremists is a petty move on the whole. I'm all for freedom of speech, but if not printing Muhammad's is more polite and decreases the chances of further terrorist actions, then that seems like the more logical action, no? If it was a Christian executing a group of people with beards because it offends him, we wouldn't say "no more beards", we'd say "get the fuck over it you retarded Christian". (intentional hyberbole) I understand what you're saying, but I wholeheartedly disagree.
This is a very bad example. A better example would be if the bible said no one can grow a beard. then a retarted christian executed a group of people with beards. then everyone else in the world grew a beard.
|
Are we really having a religion conversation in Off Topic.
People shouldn't be dicks, and should do their best to not be dicks.
Stoppitstoppitstoppit.
Also have a distraction.
-removed for nsfw-
|
On January 08 2015 02:03 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:00 Requizen wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. "Letting the terrorists win" is a pretty dumb concept imo. Risking further bloodshed and insulting an entire people just to spite a handful of extremists is a petty move on the whole. I'm all for freedom of speech, but if not printing Muhammad's is more polite and decreases the chances of further terrorist actions, then that seems like the more logical action, no? If it was a Christian executing a group of people with beards because it offends him, we wouldn't say "no more beards", we'd say "get the fuck over it you retarded Christian". (intentional hyberbole) I understand what you're saying, but I wholeheartedly disagree.
That's... dude, what? There's a difference between growing a beard and printing a worldwide picture for all to see. I really hope you're trying to be facetious because that analogy made no sense whatsoever.
A better comparison would be if a Christian extremist group was killing people for burning crosses with Jesus on them. In which case I would say yeah, just stop burning Crucifixes.
|
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On January 08 2015 02:03 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:02 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid. no, it's absolutely hilarious hurting others should probably not bring you joy tho
that's not what's going on
I'm not hurting anyone by laughing at Muhammad cartoons
you might argue that the cartoonists are hurting muslims but I'm not hurting nobody
|
On January 08 2015 02:06 Ketara wrote:
Are we really having a religion conversation in Off Topic.
People shouldn't be dicks, and should do their best to not be dicks.
Stoppitstoppitstoppit.
Also have a distraction.
mod edit: pic remived
God bless you, trying keeping the peace together with kawaii anime cat girls
|
On January 08 2015 02:09 Scip wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:03 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid. no, it's absolutely hilarious hurting others should probably not bring you joy tho that's not what's going on I'm not hurting anyone by laughing at Muhammad cartoons you might argue that the cartoonists are hurting muslims but I'm not hurting nobody
oh yeah im totes down with people drawing and laughing at muhammad cartoons. I said the organizing a day where everyone does it with the express purpose of offending people is stupid.
|
On January 08 2015 02:09 Scip wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:03 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid. no, it's absolutely hilarious hurting others should probably not bring you joy tho that's not what's going on I'm not hurting anyone by laughing at Muhammad cartoons you might argue that the cartoonists are hurting muslims but I'm not hurting nobody
Petitioning for something that ends with people getting hurt should trigger some sort of empathy. But you know, being an edgy euro teenager and all you like to remind us with every single fucking post that you don't understand empathy and hate everyone.
|
On January 08 2015 02:07 Requizen wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:03 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 02:00 Requizen wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. "Letting the terrorists win" is a pretty dumb concept imo. Risking further bloodshed and insulting an entire people just to spite a handful of extremists is a petty move on the whole. I'm all for freedom of speech, but if not printing Muhammad's is more polite and decreases the chances of further terrorist actions, then that seems like the more logical action, no? If it was a Christian executing a group of people with beards because it offends him, we wouldn't say "no more beards", we'd say "get the fuck over it you retarded Christian". (intentional hyberbole) I understand what you're saying, but I wholeheartedly disagree. That's... dude, what? There's a difference between growing a beard and printing a worldwide picture for all to see. I really hope you're trying to be facetious because that analogy made no sense whatsoever. A better comparison would be if a Christian extremist group was killing people for burning crosses with Jesus on them. In which case I would say yeah, just stop burning Crucifixes.
Yeah, it was a terrible analogy. I started with something else and switched it up and it got horribly jumbled.
I think the condemnation of senseless killing like this should always be greater than the act that caused it (especially if the act is something as harmless as a cartoon).
|
On January 08 2015 02:10 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:09 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:03 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:21 Doctorbeat wrote:
Holy fucking shit there is some disturbing imagery going around of the Charlie Hebdo stuff. One of our more controversial online blogs has a vid of a cop being executed point blank by the terrorists with a fucking AK.
I do hope there's going to be a second Draw Muhammad Day now. I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid. no, it's absolutely hilarious hurting others should probably not bring you joy tho that's not what's going on I'm not hurting anyone by laughing at Muhammad cartoons you might argue that the cartoonists are hurting muslims but I'm not hurting nobody oh yeah im totes down with people drawing and laughing at muhammad cartoons. I said the organizing a day where everyone does it with the express purpose of offending people is stupid.
There's already an International Draw Mohammed day. It's some time in May I think.
|
On January 08 2015 02:12 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:10 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 02:09 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:03 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 01:24 ComaDose wrote:
[quote]
I'm not really convinced that a good response to someone harming others for their faith should be antagonizing everyone of that faith. oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid. no, it's absolutely hilarious hurting others should probably not bring you joy tho that's not what's going on I'm not hurting anyone by laughing at Muhammad cartoons you might argue that the cartoonists are hurting muslims but I'm not hurting nobody oh yeah im totes down with people drawing and laughing at muhammad cartoons. I said the organizing a day where everyone does it with the express purpose of offending people is stupid. There's already an International Draw Mohammed day. It's some time in May I think.
Right and that's stupid. It is known that Muslims generally find that offensive. so there is basically a day every year where we all circle jerk to offending a massive group of people. The current course of the convo started when i disagreed with Doctorbeat saying that we probably shouldn't "hope" for that.
the real tragedy is that scip didnt like my "like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude." joke
|
Well, if some guy decides to shoot ppl cuz of Mohammed cartoons I don't think the lost lives are worth the fun you have for drawing/watching them. Unless you just don't give a shit about dead people.
|
On January 08 2015 02:15 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2015 02:12 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 02:10 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 02:09 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:03 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 Scip wrote:On January 08 2015 02:02 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:On January 08 2015 01:46 ComaDose wrote:On January 08 2015 01:34 Scip wrote:
[quote]
oh no, god forbid we offend moderates by comical pictures of Muhammad, we wouldn't want to insult reasonable law abiding citizens I just mean rallying people to do something that a quarter of the population of the planet find offensive is probably not fixing any problems. like you wouldn't like it if people were rallying to make the media more PC... oh.... sorry dude. But the thing is, the terrorists attacked because they found these images offensive. So complying to their wishes only shows them that they have power over us. It's a really touchy balance, sure, but removing [what they deem to be] offensive content because some dumb fucks get butt hurt over it is only letting them win. I'm not saying no one should be allowed to draw him. If people want to they can. I just think organizing an event to offend literally 23.4% is stupid. no, it's absolutely hilarious hurting others should probably not bring you joy tho that's not what's going on I'm not hurting anyone by laughing at Muhammad cartoons you might argue that the cartoonists are hurting muslims but I'm not hurting nobody oh yeah im totes down with people drawing and laughing at muhammad cartoons. I said the organizing a day where everyone does it with the express purpose of offending people is stupid. There's already an International Draw Mohammed day. It's some time in May I think. Right and that's stupid. It is known that Muslims generally find that offensive. so there is basically a day every year where we all circle jerk to offending a massive group of people. The current course of the convo started when i disagreed with Doctorbeat saying that we probably shouldn't "hope" for that.
People have a right to be offended. People have a right to post whatever random shit they want.
Neither party has the right to force either upon the other.
I get what you're saying - organizing a day to be intentionally offensive in one regard to any group is kinda dickish. But killing people over it is way more dickish and fuck those guys. Ideally, people would not intentionally be dicks to each other, but we don't live in an ideal world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
