EPT![[image loading]](http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/files/2011/09/Loud-Noises.jpeg)
Off-Topic General Discussion - Page 294
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
|
Vegetarian Wolf
China434 Posts
On October 17 2013 02:43 Slayer91 wrote: my posts were merely a statement on how id use statistical (SUCH AS WHETHER THERE WERE BORN WITH A PENIS OR NOT) to help businesses sell their products to make a profit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex more specifically to the example you brought up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex#Ambiguous_genitalia | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
Slayer91 wrote:you're either a man or a woman Slayer91 wrote:There ARE only 2 sexes. wtf... I am allowed to correct you when you say such wrong shit | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
for any statistical purpose we dont care about the 5 intersex people in the world maybe they dont have constipation and wont buy the product anyway i know there was that chick who won a womens running race but wasnt fully female but it doesnt matter it just doesnt matter my argument was how statisically categorization of people is a very useful tool you are just nitpicking details that are insignificant to the highest degree | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
just like in harry potter 1 | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
On October 17 2013 02:52 Slayer91 wrote: ok there are people with 3 legs and no anuses and a tail but if i say humans dont have a tail you wouldn't go apeshit on me would you for any statistical purpose we dont care about the 5 intersex people in the world maybe they dont have constipation and wont buy the product anyway Maybe if it would make you rant this much about statistics again i really learned a lot from you. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
im not some kind of statistics god but if everyones ignoring my argument and making strawman arguments and then dispute they are strawmen arguments i have no choice but to keep restating it | ||
|
Vegetarian Wolf
China434 Posts
 | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
| ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
ComaDose wrote: You can't just lump people into binary categories. Slayer91 wrote: yes you can binary categories woman 0 man 1 amagerd you binary categories this is how the conversation started for you too right? | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
do you see anything wrong with that. add an extra line that puts some any weird mutation to 0 and then its still valid binary code. because the binary code was meant for statistical purposes then it doesnt matter at all if its only 99.99999% accurate | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
On October 17 2013 03:04 Slayer91 wrote: yes. do you see anything wrong with that. add an extra line that puts some any weird mutation to 0 and then its still valid binary code. because the binary code was meant for statistical purposes then it doesnt matter at all if its only 99.99999% accurate You must understand that I have never addressed your arguement about advertising because its obviously true that's how marketing teams work. I understood this before you reiterated it many (many) times. I see a lot wrong with what you wrote and that is why i chose to talk to you about it. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
There is nothing wrong with what I said. Putting in binary categories that are 99.9999% accurate is statistically perfectly valid and i never claimed it was valid for all human beings in some human rights context so what are you trying to claim i said? | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
On October 17 2013 02:06 Slayer91 wrote: im not sure about this either way i dont have a well refined opinion yet this thread is just moving too fast Do this while I'm at work, not right now guys wtf. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 17 2013 03:06 ComaDose wrote: You must understand that I have never addressed your arguement about advertising because its obviously true that's how marketing teams work. I understood this before you reiterated it many (many) times. I see a lot wrong with what you wrote and that is why i chose to talk to you about it. Your argument is that "one can't generalize people" When in fact that is not only common practice (so clearly one CAN if fact do this), but it can also be very useful, and the smart thing to do. Which is the point you don't seem to understand, in favor of special snowflake hippie talk | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
On October 17 2013 03:08 Slayer91 wrote: Yes, there is nothing wrong with my argument about advertising. It is so obviously true that I am confused as to why you didnt say this like 5 pages ago instead of wasting your time. There is nothing wrong with what I said. Putting in binary categories that are 99.9999% accurate is statistically perfectly valid and i never claimed it was valid for all human beings in some human rights context so what are you trying to claim i said? Cause im not talking about advertising and you quoted me.. EDIT: enough with this snowflake hippy talk i didnt even start it and i was never talking about advertising and ive been accused of ambushing with feminist ideals. plz. dont quote me and tell me everyone can be lumped into men and women. I will correct you. | ||
|
Sponkz
Denmark4564 Posts
| ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
| ||
