On September 25 2013 04:01 MoonBear wrote: Pokemon X because Swirlix is X exclusive. But I might get a copy of Y later.
Also wtf happened to this thread. I expect better posting.
Also that pun rule exists for a reason. Those puns were terrible.
I don't actually know the differences between X/Y and I'm too lazy to do the research.
I know faeries are a knew type, which should be fun. I've always been a fan of ghost types (I got more excited than I should have when my 8 year old brother showed me Litwick in B/W)
On September 25 2013 04:01 MoonBear wrote: Pokemon X because Swirlix is X exclusive. But I might get a copy of Y later.
Also wtf happened to this thread. I expect better posting.
Also that pun rule exists for a reason. Those puns were terrible.
I don't actually know the differences between X/Y and I'm too lazy to do the research.
I know faeries are a knew type, which should be fun. I've always been a fan of ghost types (I got more excited than I should have when my 8 year old brother showed me Litwick in B/W)
I would honestly cook a lot more if I didn't have to do dishes afterwards.
Somehow getting forced to have to wash dishes at a family gathering sucks. Especially if it's a giant fucking pot that had shit you don't even like to eat (Anybody Cambodian here will know what Pra Hok is).
I don't usually bitch about pokemon designs, BUT I think they could mix it up a bit. They don't have to have a new electric mouse, a few butterflies and a dog in every damned generation. It feels like Fire Emblem where they just keep rehashing the same stuff over and over (Jeigan, 1 knight, 2 cavaliers, an early archer and thief PLEASE. Creativity).
On September 25 2013 05:07 Scip wrote: I don't usually bitch about pokemon designs, BUT I think they could mix it up a bit. They don't have to have a new electric mouse, a few butterflies and a dog in every damned generation. It feels like Fire Emblem where they just keep rehashing the same stuff over and over (Jeigan, 1 knight, 2 cavaliers, an early archer and thief PLEASE. Creativity).
At least they don't all have revive passives and % health damage.
On September 25 2013 05:07 Scip wrote: I don't usually bitch about pokemon designs, BUT I think they could mix it up a bit. They don't have to have a new electric mouse, a few butterflies and a dog in every damned generation. It feels like Fire Emblem where they just keep rehashing the same stuff over and over (Jeigan, 1 knight, 2 cavaliers, an early archer and thief PLEASE. Creativity).
At least they don't all have revive passives and % health damage.