I wonder if I should start betting. despite knowing next to nothing about LOTV I have a strong feeling Byul will smack down Dear with no issues, would bet my house on it. we'll see how things play out I guess...
Dear vs ByuL's gonna be very interesting depending on Dear's form on that day. He barely lost to Byul in the semi-finals of last season so I guess he's looking for some revenge.
Pande it kinda ticks me off that you didn't put the "-" in the title, now it doesn't look pretty on the left side bar when day 1 and day 2 are beneath each other .
On December 16 2015 00:22 Musicus wrote: Pande it kinda ticks me off that you didn't put the "-" in the title, now it doesn't look pretty on the left side bar when day 1 and day 2 are beneath each other .
Good job i have the power to change that then isn't it
On December 16 2015 00:22 Musicus wrote: Pande it kinda ticks me off that you didn't put the "-" in the title, now it doesn't look pretty on the left side bar when day 1 and day 2 are beneath each other .
Good job i have the power to change that then isn't it
On December 15 2015 21:36 Pandemona wrote: Dear vs ByuL clear game of the day for me, wow going to be good one! Wonder what crazy Dear builds we might see
I hope Bunny can finally find some consistency. He's shown flashes of brilliance like knocking life into code b but he fades into obscurity shorty after.
with Zest's extreme PvP skills, I want to see what he'll bring into Legacy. Also I'm waiting to steal builds from him because everything that Zest does become standard for the Protoss <3 at this rate I fear there will be a team kill between Life and Zest, ... unless either of them get defeated by someone else... either way it's going to be sad for me :'(
Reality vs Bunnyin in GSL Preseason 1 round of 16. Reality is at 23.2% Blizzcon Chances, with a 65.2% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 23.56%, or 22.52% if they lose. Bunny is at 0.72% Blizzcon Chances, with a 34.8% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 0.74%, or 0.7% if they lose.
Hurricane vs Zestin in GSL Preseason 1 round of 16. Hurricane is at 7.37% Blizzcon Chances, with a 34.37% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 7.67%, or 7.21% if they lose. Zest is at 36.06% Blizzcon Chances, with a 65.63% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 36.51%, or 35.2% if they lose.
ByuL vs Dearin in GSL Preseason 1 round of 16. ByuL is at 32.1% Blizzcon Chances, with a 50.09% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 32.85%, or 31.36% if they lose. Dear is at 25.89% Blizzcon Chances, with a 49.91% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 26.58%, or 25.21% if they lose.
Forte vs TRUEin in GSL Preseason 1 round of 16. Forte is at 1.04% Blizzcon Chances, with a 41.23% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 1.08%, or 1.01% if they lose. TRUE is at 26.81% Blizzcon Chances, with a 58.77% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 27.36%, or 26.04% if they lose.
Life vs Darkin in GSL Preseason 1 quarterfinals. Life has the #2 Headband. Life is at 47.79% Blizzcon Chances, with a 52.22% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 49.49%, or 45.94% if they lose. Dark is at 46.12% Blizzcon Chances, with a 47.78% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 47.92%, or 44.46% if they lose.
herO vs Sorryin in GSL Preseason 1 quarterfinals. herO is at 46.07% Blizzcon Chances, with a 67.51% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 47.1%, or 43.92% if they lose. Sorry is at 1.78% Blizzcon Chances, with a 32.49% chance to win this match. If they win their Blizzcon Chances go up to 1.94%, or 1.7% if they lose.
herO has a 20.17% chance to win ----going from 46.07% to 54.7% if they get 1st, or 43.89% if they don't. Life has a 17.52% chance to win ----going from 47.79% to 56.46% if they get 1st, or 45.95% if they don't. Dark has a 15.54% chance to win ----going from 46.12% to 55.06% if they get 1st, or 44.47% if they don't. Zest has a 8.97% chance to win ----going from 36.06% to 45.73% if they get 1st, or 35.1% if they don't. TRUE has a 7.65% chance to win ----going from 26.81% to 36.01% if they get 1st, or 26.05% if they don't. + Show Spoiler [More Winning Chances] +
ByuL has a 6.97% chance to win ----going from 32.1% to 41.71% if they get 1st, or 31.38% if they don't. Reality has a 6.88% chance to win ----going from 23.2% to 32.05% if they get 1st, or 22.54% if they don't. Dear has a 6.87% chance to win ----going from 25.89% to 35.01% if they get 1st, or 25.22% if they don't. Sorry has a 3.93% chance to win ----going from 1.78% to 3.77% if they get 1st, or 1.7% if they don't. Hurricane has a 2.77% chance to win ----going from 7.37% to 12.68% if they get 1st, or 7.22% if they don't. Forte has a 1.51% chance to win ----going from 1.04% to 2.45% if they get 1st, or 1.02% if they don't. Bunny has a 1.21% chance to win ----going from 0.72% to 1.78% if they get 1st, or 0.7% if they don't.
On December 16 2015 03:24 Spongebobshotgun wrote: Sorry this has probably been asked a ton and it's off topic. Why aren't there Vods and just rebroadcasts? Im at work and can't watch :'(.
On December 16 2015 18:39 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: so.... source of afreeca works for me. this is an incredible experience compared to twitch
Source from Afreeca to me looks more like high from twitch but I might be mistaken!
probably, but it's still an improvement
Source on twitch doesn't work for you?
Twitch servers are awful. I have to watch twitch on lower settings than other streaming platforms.
It started working really well for me when they changed the player. Although I also changed from Firefox to Chrome since I had a lot of problems on Firefox.
On December 16 2015 18:39 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: so.... source of afreeca works for me. this is an incredible experience compared to twitch
Source from Afreeca to me looks more like high from twitch but I might be mistaken!
probably, but it's still an improvement
Source on twitch doesn't work for you?
Twitch servers are awful. I have to watch twitch on lower settings than other streaming platforms.
It started working really well for me when they changed the player. Although I also changed from Firefox to Chrome since I had a lot of problems on Firefox.
I dunno. For me twitch only started working fine exactly yesterday when GSL started back up.
On December 16 2015 18:39 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: so.... source of afreeca works for me. this is an incredible experience compared to twitch
Source from Afreeca to me looks more like high from twitch but I might be mistaken!
probably, but it's still an improvement
Source on twitch doesn't work for you?
Twitch servers are awful. I have to watch twitch on lower settings than other streaming platforms.
It started working really well for me when they changed the player. Although I also changed from Firefox to Chrome since I had a lot of problems on Firefox.
I dunno. For me twitch only started working fine exactly yesterday when GSL started back up.
On December 16 2015 18:39 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: so.... source of afreeca works for me. this is an incredible experience compared to twitch
Source from Afreeca to me looks more like high from twitch but I might be mistaken!
probably, but it's still an improvement
Source on twitch doesn't work for you?
Twitch servers are awful. I have to watch twitch on lower settings than other streaming platforms.
It started working really well for me when they changed the player. Although I also changed from Firefox to Chrome since I had a lot of problems on Firefox.
FIrefox is horrible for me :D I have 0 issues with source twitch atm off crap internet at work believe in the chrome
On December 16 2015 19:00 MiniFotToss wrote: did they change the studio?
They weren't in this part of the studio yesterday, if that's what you're asking. There was something going on in the studio so they were casting upstairs or something.
Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
Maybe it's wrong to laugh but this is pretty funny somehow.
I just keep giggling
I'm like... dumbfounded. How does that even happen? I looked it up, that thing has a max speed of 12.5 miles per hour, around 20 km/h. Just get off the damn thing.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
Do you sleep on your face O.O also listening too close to artossi and tasteless made me think there is a time difference between the game and the cast
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
Do you sleep on your face O.O also listening too close to artossi and tasteless made me think there is a time difference between the game and the cast
I usually can only sleep on my side, I get the same problem when I'm lazy and don't shave for a while. Beards suck.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
Do you sleep on your face O.O also listening too close to artossi and tasteless made me think there is a time difference between the game and the cast
I usually can only sleep on my side, I get the same problem when I'm lazy and don't shave for a while. Beards suck.
Yeah they do :D I sweat more than gumiho so when my beard get's longer it cause inflammation.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
Do you sleep on your face O.O also listening too close to artossi and tasteless made me think there is a time difference between the game and the cast
I usually can only sleep on my side, I get the same problem when I'm lazy and don't shave for a while. Beards suck.
yeah I also sleep on my sides, longer beards suck for that :D
On December 16 2015 19:14 The_Red_Viper wrote: TvT looks underwhelming
It looks ridiculously random, and every engagement is clearly decided the second the first player drops his tanks....
I think the issue is with Afterburners being a faster method of repositioning than Stim and Resiege, essentially making Medivacs the engagement forcer. Coupled with flying Tanks... lolrip.
On December 16 2015 19:14 The_Red_Viper wrote: TvT looks underwhelming
It looks ridiculously random, and every engagement is clearly decided the second the first player drops his tanks....
I think the issue is with Afterburners being a faster method of repositioning than Stim and Resiege, essentially making Medivacs the engagement forcer. Coupled with flying Tanks... lolrip.
I see a future with insane micro making it not so random and incredible to watch
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:14 The_Red_Viper wrote: TvT looks underwhelming
It looks ridiculously random, and every engagement is clearly decided the second the first player drops his tanks....
I think the issue is with Afterburners being a faster method of repositioning than Stim and Resiege, essentially making Medivacs the engagement forcer. Coupled with flying Tanks... lolrip.
Considering that Blizzard is thinking about forcing tanks to unsiege when picked up, this most likely won't be an issue for too much longer.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:14 The_Red_Viper wrote: TvT looks underwhelming
It looks ridiculously random, and every engagement is clearly decided the second the first player drops his tanks....
I think the issue is with Afterburners being a faster method of repositioning than Stim and Resiege, essentially making Medivacs the engagement forcer. Coupled with flying Tanks... lolrip.
I see a future with insane micro making it not so random and incredible to watch
The first dropped tank fires first, and tankdrops beat presieged tanks due to mobility. The only micro I can think of that saves you after the enemy sieges first is lifting EVERYTHING and boosting backwards.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:14 The_Red_Viper wrote: TvT looks underwhelming
It looks ridiculously random, and every engagement is clearly decided the second the first player drops his tanks....
I think the issue is with Afterburners being a faster method of repositioning than Stim and Resiege, essentially making Medivacs the engagement forcer. Coupled with flying Tanks... lolrip.
I see a future with insane micro making it not so random and incredible to watch
The first dropped tank fires first, and tankdrops beat presieged tanks due to mobility. The only micro I can think of that saves you after the enemy sieges first is lifting EVERYTHING and boosting backwards.
Why aren't there more vikings in play btw? Seems like a smart unit to use when you got that much value in a medivac
On December 16 2015 19:04 Musicus wrote: Tastelss, how do you sleep with a beard like this? I find it really annoying to rest my face on my pillow with a slightly longer beard. 1 week is as long as I can go without shaving/trimming.
Edit: I guess it's fine if you sleep on your back .
At least you can grow one ;_;
I wish I had that problem
You could just transfer some of your excess hair from the top of your head to your chin.
I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
On December 16 2015 19:19 Pandemona wrote: Haha sgtk stop flirting with the lr thread punters xD
No
On December 16 2015 19:19 HellHound wrote:
On December 16 2015 19:19 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
On December 16 2015 19:18 HellHound wrote:
On December 16 2015 19:17 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
On December 16 2015 19:14 HellHound wrote:
On December 16 2015 19:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
On December 16 2015 19:11 HellHound wrote:
On December 16 2015 19:09 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: [quote] I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
I helped my mother order a TL mousepad for christmas, won't arrive until next year and the cheapest shipping was 9 euros... not really digging the jinx shop. But oh well, it's christmas .
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
On December 16 2015 19:09 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: [quote] I pretty much grow the hair on the top of my head to make up for the complete lack of facial hair
So just like my girlfriend then.
essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
On December 16 2015 19:13 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: [quote] essentially. it's one of my more feminine features. except im probably sexier than your girlfriend
Calling you sexier than my girlfriend is a borderline insult.
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
Is that you on the profile picture? You sort of look like the guy who made the Room in that picture.
Comparing people to Tommy Wiseau? Are you insane?
Maybe SGTK has a point, people can often compare people who have the vaguest resemblance like the curly hair. But what's wrong with being compared to Tommy Wiseau? : D
On December 16 2015 19:45 Taf the Ghost wrote: LotV Positive: Quick games, so early mistakes lead to very quick GGs, rather than delayed "it's been over for 5+ minutes already" events.
Negative: Hard to banter in LR threads when the games just get going quickly. I forgot we used to use that 3-8 minutes to just troll each other.
I can troll more but am at work atm I think that's a net positive btw
On December 16 2015 19:50 Elentos wrote: Guys I forgot, who was the Zerg in that one game that one time where Corruption made all the difference? Was that Roro?
On December 16 2015 19:49 Douillos wrote: Does GOM still play incredible music during breaks (no sound @work)?
I mean, incredible is certainly one word to describe it.
I can't remember it right now but 3 or 4 years back there was the funniest song ever. something about power or something. I just remember laughing my ass off at each break
On December 16 2015 19:49 Douillos wrote: Does GOM still play incredible music during breaks (no sound @work)?
I mean, incredible is certainly one word to describe it.
I can't remember it right now but 3 or 4 years back there was the funniest song ever. something about power or something. I just remember laughing my ass off at each break
On December 16 2015 19:50 Elentos wrote: Guys I forgot, who was the Zerg in that one game that one time where Corruption made all the difference? Was that Roro?
On December 16 2015 19:50 Elentos wrote: Guys I forgot, who was the Zerg in that one game that one time where Corruption made all the difference? Was that Roro?
On December 16 2015 20:14 Ramiz1989 wrote: LOL wtf Dear!? He sniped a base, and then start fighting with that army for no reason, just lost all of it. :/
On December 16 2015 20:14 Ramiz1989 wrote: LOL wtf Dear!? He sniped a base, and then start fighting with that army for no reason, just lost all of it. :/
On December 16 2015 14:14 Liquid`Snute wrote: Seen many Zergs try to play with Ling/Ravager/Infestor/Ultra vs Terran and melee ups instead of ranged, they always seem to have less success than roach/ravager/inf. Lings still kinda suck, especially without Baneling support. The argument I hear is that 'it's more mobile' and 'just wait until you get ultras out' but in general all they end up doing is defend and sit on their side of the map. Defensively it seems weak, harder to play, not very rewarding and bad. Very excited for TRUE vs Forte today, and hoping for some disgusting ravager/infestor styles OR if the other ZvT styles show up, hopefully something that actually looks strong and successful...!
I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
On December 16 2015 20:39 Ramiz1989 wrote: I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
He didn't even start 3/3 until he was pretty much dead.
On December 16 2015 20:39 Ramiz1989 wrote: I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
A deserved loss idd.. And a deserved win from Forte I must say
On December 16 2015 20:39 Ramiz1989 wrote: I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
He didn't even start 3/3 until he was pretty much dead.
On December 16 2015 20:38 Calthrash wrote: TRUE's style makes no sense to me...
Turtle to ultra and a move?
No that was the sensible part, the stuff before that made no sense. Mass slow banes? Speed roaches with no upgrades? No ravagers? There are way better styles to go into fast ultras imo
On December 16 2015 20:39 Ramiz1989 wrote: I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
He didn't even start 3/3 until he was pretty much dead.
He started 2/2 after he finished hive imo
That could be right. And when that happens and you lose, you totally deserved it.
On December 16 2015 20:39 Ramiz1989 wrote: I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
A deserved loss idd.. And a deserved win from Forte I must say
Yeah, Salvation played a solid game, a bit sloppy at the start but did quite well in the end.
On December 16 2015 20:39 Ramiz1989 wrote: I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
A deserved loss idd.. And a deserved win from Forte I must say
Yeah, Salvation played a solid game, a bit sloppy at the start but did quite well in the end.
On December 16 2015 20:39 Ramiz1989 wrote: I'm glad that TRUE has lost this one... showing that you can't just build whatever you want and do "well"... He had a ton of useless Roaches in the late game with melee upgrades(and Roaches already have pathetic DPS) instead of Ravagers, he didn't have Baneling speed, he had his usual sloppy control etc...
A deserved loss idd.. And a deserved win from Forte I must say
Yeah, Salvation played a solid game, a bit sloppy at the start but did quite well in the end.
AH so that's who forte is
Yeah, changed his ID, trying to channel his inner bogus.
I think this is totally the right (and the only?) way to play this map for terran. You cant just go for a normal game when zerg has access to all those gold bases.
Why do zergs no longer play ling/bling/muta? Just because of the larva change? I think with the new economy just building an extra hatch is no problem and in the long run the stacking injects gets you more larva anway. Of course you can no longer go heavy muta, but just building ten for map control while going into hive and ultras seems really good to me. Anyway I went back to that since I can't win vs terran with ravagers, pure marines destroys me too hard.
On December 16 2015 20:45 Calthrash wrote: I think this is totally the right (and the only?) way to play this map for terran. You cant just go for a normal game when zerg has access to all those gold bases.
very true. im giving forte a hard time but taking those gold that fast...hard to stop
On December 16 2015 20:46 Musicus wrote: Why do zergs no longer play ling/bling/muta? Just because of the larva change? I think with the new economy just building an extra hatch is no problem and in the long run the stacking injects gets you more larva anway. Of course you can no longer go heavy muta, but just building ten for map control while going into hive and ultras seems really good to me. Anyway I went back to that since I can't win vs terran with ravagers, pure marines destroys me too hard.
From what I have heard its mostly because Mutas feel useless mostly thanks to liberators and tank/medivac micro is pretty strong. Most people just seem to prefer roach/ravager by a mile.
i don't know why Z would play lotv without at least some roaches/ravagers :/ taking the gold base is also super risky, prion terraces is extremely infamous for all kinds of early rax builds from terran
On December 16 2015 20:46 Musicus wrote: Why do zergs no longer play ling/bling/muta? Just because of the larva change? I think with the new economy just building an extra hatch is no problem and in the long run the stacking injects gets you more larva anway. Of course you can no longer go heavy muta, but just building ten for map control while going into hive and ultras seems really good to me. Anyway I went back to that since I can't win vs terran with ravagers, pure marines destroys me too hard.
From what I have heard its mostly because Mutas feel useless mostly thanks to liberators and tank/medivac micro is pretty strong. Most people just seem to prefer roach/ravager by a mile.
The funny bit about all of this is that we're so used to seeing so much cleaner play by high-end Korean players, but there's a massive lack of polish as a constant theme of these matches.
But, they're no BitByBit.Prime. May he forever be unable to be forgotten.
question. how come we didnt get to see the faces of the players? are they playing from home or studio? kinda sucks to not see the players and their reactions
With how slow things take to change around the e-sports world.. if we start asking for Bo5 to be the standard now, do you think we'll have it by the 2017 WCS season? :D
On December 16 2015 20:51 Golgotha wrote: question. how come we didnt get to see the faces of the players? are they playing from home or studio? kinda sucks to not see the players and their reactions
It's online until Ro4. So yeah, they're playing from home/team houses.
On December 16 2015 20:51 Golgotha wrote: question. how come we didnt get to see the faces of the players? are they playing from home or studio? kinda sucks to not see the players and their reactions
On December 16 2015 20:51 Golgotha wrote: question. how come we didnt get to see the faces of the players? are they playing from home or studio? kinda sucks to not see the players and their reactions
It's online until Ro4. So yeah, they're playing from home/team houses.
On December 16 2015 20:51 Golgotha wrote: question. how come we didnt get to see the faces of the players? are they playing from home or studio? kinda sucks to not see the players and their reactions
They're at home, the studio is still closed for now.
I believe they said there will be an opening pizza night on Friday or something?
On December 16 2015 20:51 Golgotha wrote: question. how come we didnt get to see the faces of the players? are they playing from home or studio? kinda sucks to not see the players and their reactions
It's online until Ro4. So yeah, they're playing from home/team houses.
Awesome stuff from Forte, although TRUE didn't look to be on his A-game. I believe h won an Olimoleague recently his LOTV is not bad at all, Forte seemed to have a very specific strategy on each map and I really liked it.
Just wish the games were longer!!! Maybe we need to start seeing BO5 group stage matches! lol
On December 16 2015 20:49 Liquid`Snute wrote: i don't know why Z would play lotv without at least some roaches/ravagers :/ taking the gold base is also super risky, prion terraces is extremely infamous for all kinds of early rax builds from terran
TRUE's play didn't seem very inspired tbh, ByuL is gonna show the way tomorrow
On December 16 2015 20:49 Liquid`Snute wrote: i don't know why Z would play lotv without at least some roaches/ravagers :/ taking the gold base is also super risky, prion terraces is extremely infamous for all kinds of early rax builds from terran
TRUE's play didn't seem very inspired tbh, ByuL is gonna show the way tomorrow
In hots his zvt was literally 80 banes every game so
Atm no game really feels epic I don't like that Blizzard wants games to end very fast in pretty much every franchise they have atm. First HeroesOfTheStorm, then Overwatch and now sc2. No epic games allowed? :/
I hope we will actually see these long games when people get better, right now i find it hard to get excited for the gameplay most of the time
On December 16 2015 20:57 Golgotha wrote: im sorry for complaining but it doesnt seem smart to have GSL times be so late for America. Isn't there a better time to run this show?
It's on Korean prime time which seems appropriate. Also, making it earlier will cut in EU viewership..
On December 16 2015 20:57 Golgotha wrote: im sorry for complaining but it doesnt seem smart to have GSL times be so late for America. Isn't there a better time to run this show?
I mean.. realistically, America is probably the worst timezone to cater to, Starcraft-wise. And I say this as someone who has woken up at 2 a.m. to watch GSL for three years now.
It's Korean prime time, and it's a decent morning time for the Europeans. It's probably the best time slot they could possibly have.
On December 16 2015 20:56 The_Red_Viper wrote: Atm no game really feels epic I don't like that Blizzard wants games to end very fast in pretty much every franchise they have atm. First HeroesOfTheStorm, then Overwatch and now sc2. No epic games allowed? :/
I hope we will actually see these long games when people get better, right now i find it hard to get excited for the gameplay most of the time
People forget the start of WoL and HotS. Same length of games in the core bit, just +5 minutes for the start up. Things will get figured out and we'll start seeing 15+ minute games most of the time.
It'll also help when we get a map pool more tuned to what LotV is about than HotS+ maps.
SC2 for an American is either because you work nights or VODS work fine. It's actually gotten a lot easier (and cheaper!) to be a SC2 fan in the last few years.
On December 16 2015 20:56 The_Red_Viper wrote: Atm no game really feels epic I don't like that Blizzard wants games to end very fast in pretty much every franchise they have atm. First HeroesOfTheStorm, then Overwatch and now sc2. No epic games allowed? :/
I hope we will actually see these long games when people get better, right now i find it hard to get excited for the gameplay most of the time
Don't worry, the "epic" games will be coming as things stablilize. I've already seen a couple 40 minute games creeping in on TLO's stream, and he's apologizing for how slow it can potentially be.
Catz had one that was.. an hour and thirty minutes? A few days ago.
The potential is there for the drawn out stuff. Things are still unstable, for now, I'd say enjoy it while everything's still fresh.
On December 16 2015 20:56 The_Red_Viper wrote: Atm no game really feels epic I don't like that Blizzard wants games to end very fast in pretty much every franchise they have atm. First HeroesOfTheStorm, then Overwatch and now sc2. No epic games allowed? :/
I hope we will actually see these long games when people get better, right now i find it hard to get excited for the gameplay most of the time
Don't worry, the "epic" games will be coming as things stablilize. I've already seen a couple 40 minute games creeping in on TLO's stream, and he's apologizing for how slow it can potentially be.
Catz had one that was.. an hour and thirty minutes? A few days ago.
The potential is there for the drawn out stuff. Things are still unstable, for now, I'd say enjoy it while everything's still fresh.
Remember that part of the games going really fast is that people still die to random allins/moveouts/cheeses all the time. WoL games became longer as time went on, and Hots got to 1,5+ hours quite regularly in half the matchups (ty SH)
If you like Zest the PvP was obviously great, not gonna lie Didn't watch the last the ZvT though, but the games were all pretty short so i just figured what happened :D
As i said, hopefully we will get longer games as soon as the players get better, if these short games are the norm it will be hard for me to get excited I want some epic stuff here and there! (no sh games weren't epic, most mech turtle games neither)
On December 16 2015 22:14 Big J wrote: so no good games?
They were all pretty one-sided, fast games.
I'm pretty surprised Zerg still hasn't figured out a way to safely get to Hive tech. It seems like the majority of the time Zerg dies, it's because they're literally banking on 8 Armor Ultras to win them the game and then realize they don't have the army to support the Ultras. If they take the their time getting to Hive Tech I would feel they would be a lot better off.
On December 16 2015 22:14 Big J wrote: so no good games?
They were all pretty one-sided, fast games.
I'm pretty surprised Zerg still hasn't figured out a way to safely get to Hive tech. It seems like the majority of the time Zerg dies, it's because they're literally banking on 8 Armor Ultras to win them the game and then realize they don't have the army to support the Ultras. If they take the their time getting to Hive Tech I would feel they would be a lot better off.
Doesn't matter if Terran has ghosts by the time ultras are out, and it seems a lot easier for Terran's to tech to Ghost than to Zerg to tech Ultra, I think this is mainly because it seems terran is always(based on very few games) ahead coming into the midgame due to reapers or just plain greed which zerg can't match because it's simply too risky to cut corners vs Terran, the risk/reward isn't there.
On December 16 2015 20:56 The_Red_Viper wrote: Atm no game really feels epic I don't like that Blizzard wants games to end very fast in pretty much every franchise they have atm. First HeroesOfTheStorm, then Overwatch and now sc2. No epic games allowed? :/
I hope we will actually see these long games when people get better, right now i find it hard to get excited for the gameplay most of the time
Don't worry, the "epic" games will be coming as things stablilize. I've already seen a couple 40 minute games creeping in on TLO's stream, and he's apologizing for how slow it can potentially be.
Catz had one that was.. an hour and thirty minutes? A few days ago.
The potential is there for the drawn out stuff. Things are still unstable, for now, I'd say enjoy it while everything's still fresh.
i had a 1:30 game on ladder where I had the entire map with a huge bank and was maxed out but my opponent turtled on 1 base with broodlord viper and I couldn't break him.
On December 16 2015 20:56 The_Red_Viper wrote: Atm no game really feels epic I don't like that Blizzard wants games to end very fast in pretty much every franchise they have atm. First HeroesOfTheStorm, then Overwatch and now sc2. No epic games allowed? :/
I hope we will actually see these long games when people get better, right now i find it hard to get excited for the gameplay most of the time
Don't worry, the "epic" games will be coming as things stablilize. I've already seen a couple 40 minute games creeping in on TLO's stream, and he's apologizing for how slow it can potentially be.
Catz had one that was.. an hour and thirty minutes? A few days ago.
The potential is there for the drawn out stuff. Things are still unstable, for now, I'd say enjoy it while everything's still fresh.
i had a 1:30 game on ladder where I had the entire map with a huge bank and was maxed out but my opponent turtled on 1 base with broodlord viper and I couldn't break him.
On December 16 2015 22:14 Big J wrote: so no good games?
They were all pretty one-sided, fast games.
I'm pretty surprised Zerg still hasn't figured out a way to safely get to Hive tech. It seems like the majority of the time Zerg dies, it's because they're literally banking on 8 Armor Ultras to win them the game and then realize they don't have the army to support the Ultras. If they take the their time getting to Hive Tech I would feel they would be a lot better off.
I don't know why you are surprised, with how new the game is and how different it is from hots all the timings and stuff aren't figured out. It's going to take more then a month before people do.
Also from what I have heard and seen is Terran's midgame is stronger then zerg's as well.
So far, the games in LotV seem to be good and funny. But. I am slowly getting one negative feeling. Artosis formulated it today as a joke, but I am afraid, it is not a joke. He called it: "Too much action". Well, that is it. Sometimes, it seems like too much chaos compared to the old good HotS. IT will be more difficult and funny for players, but it might become confusing for the people watching ...
On December 17 2015 01:57 Diabolique wrote: So far, the games in LotV seem to be good and funny. But. I am slowly getting one negative feeling. Artosis formulated it today as a joke, but I am afraid, it is not a joke. He called it: "Too much action". Well, that is it. Sometimes, it seems like too much chaos compared to the old good HotS. IT will be more difficult and funny for players, but it might become confusing for the people watching ...
That's just because the game is new. Safe standard openings are still being developed and balance might be all over the place. Just give it time and all this "too much action" will settle into something more similar to HotS.
On December 16 2015 20:56 The_Red_Viper wrote: Atm no game really feels epic I don't like that Blizzard wants games to end very fast in pretty much every franchise they have atm. First HeroesOfTheStorm, then Overwatch and now sc2. No epic games allowed? :/
I hope we will actually see these long games when people get better, right now i find it hard to get excited for the gameplay most of the time
I'm pretty sure this depends on the maps rather than the game, when the mappool will be updated there will be more such games. Edit: and I think in this tournament the terrans will struggle more against Protoss than against Zergs, I'll try to catch the games tomorrow :o
On December 16 2015 22:14 Big J wrote: so no good games?
They were all pretty one-sided, fast games.
I'm pretty surprised Zerg still hasn't figured out a way to safely get to Hive tech. It seems like the majority of the time Zerg dies, it's because they're literally banking on 8 Armor Ultras to win them the game and then realize they don't have the army to support the Ultras. If they take the their time getting to Hive Tech I would feel they would be a lot better off.
I'm not. I think the general dynamic changes favor Zerg in the lategame, but Terran in the midgame and that has always been Terran's strongest weapon, not even letting it get to the lategame. I think Demuslim (or was it qxc?) said it pretty well when he started with the beta: "OK, so zerg lategame is even stronger right now. Well, it's not like we really tried to play that against them anyways, so even more than before Terran will just try to get an advantage in the midgame". (paraphrased)
What seems to be the most popular Zerg playstyle right now is to go for the roach/ravager/ling style (usually plus infestors) in the midgame and then go up to ultras. My personal assessment about that style is that it is very good at forcing Terran into the defense early and preventing death from the midgame attacks of Terran but at the end of the day plays very much like the old roach/hydra style. It has problems with drops, problems with maxed out Terran pushes and transitions late/badly (underupgraded) into ultralisks. But it is really strong right now because an aggressive Terran player will often head on run into a wall or roaches. The other Zerg playstyle, focusing on ling/bling and something spire (corruptors or mutas) transitions much better upgradewise and has a much better chance in maxed vs maxed fights and can actually deal with drops. But it feels very weak against the traditional Terran midgame pushes due to liberators and the larvanerf and may still require some form of roach/ravager play to start of because of liberators and hellbat pushes. I think these sorts of playstyles - bunch of variations of it like ling/ravager/infestor with ling upgrades, corruptors or mutas, maybe lurkers as in blade's guide - are in theory better, but much harder to play and you often fall 20 supply behind in the midgame just because of the larvachange and probably the 12 worker start which make it almost impossible to grab a 4 base vs 3 base eco advantage with 75+ drones as was required in HotS to play that way.
The game is still young, but anyways, those are my thoughts on TvZ and why it is very even at the moment but could swing heavily in either direction if one side just finds a cookie-cutter build that ensures a midgame kill, or can defend all aggression while reaching Hive.
On December 17 2015 04:33 FrostedMiniWheats wrote: hmm, still pretty disappointed with LotV, but maybe with Zerg being so strong ByuL can now rightfully assume his position as lord of the universe :p
He's gonna lose finals in ZvZ to complete the cycle.
On December 17 2015 01:57 Diabolique wrote: So far, the games in LotV seem to be good and funny. But. I am slowly getting one negative feeling. Artosis formulated it today as a joke, but I am afraid, it is not a joke. He called it: "Too much action". Well, that is it. Sometimes, it seems like too much chaos compared to the old good HotS. IT will be more difficult and funny for players, but it might become confusing for the people watching ...
That's just because the game is new. Safe standard openings are still being developed and balance might be all over the place. Just give it time and all this "too much action" will settle into something more similar to HotS.
God, I hope not. "Too much action" means BW-esque. No to HotS meta.
EPT
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/1VFGBlP.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/vursH.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/images/usericons/348366.png)
AfreecaTV Korea | 
TwitchTV | ![[image loading]](http://s.gr-assets.com/assets/icons/twitter_icon-7d4a7be5917c6c8e687413669d687b1c.jpg){kind=icon}
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Xo97b.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/3226.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/712.jpg)
Bunny vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/3815.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/977.jpg)
Hurricane vs ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/958.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1097.jpg)
ByuL![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/967.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/4707.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/jgmCp.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Joub3.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/H5LzV.png)
OGamingTV
.
.
