★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
19%
★★★- Good game (8)
50%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
13%
16 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (4)
24%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (6)
35%
★★★- Good game (6)
35%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
6%
17 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
17%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
33%
★★★- Good game (2)
17%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
8%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
25%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (11)
50%
★★★- Good game (3)
14%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
9%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
9%
22 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (6)
32%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (8)
42%
★★★- Good game (4)
21%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
5%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (4)
44%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
44%
★★★- Good game (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
11%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
25%
★★★- Good game (7)
58%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
17%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Losers Match Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
22%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
22%
★★★- Good game (4)
44%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
11%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Losers Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (5)
71%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
14%
★★★- Good game (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
14%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (5)
63%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
38%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Winners Match Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
8%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
8%
★★★- Good game (7)
54%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
15%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
15%
13 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Winners Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
20%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
40%
★★★- Good game (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
20%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
20%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
30%
★★★- Good game (3)
30%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
10%
10 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (4)
33%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
33%
★★★- Good game (3)
25%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
8%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
4%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
8%
★★★- Good game (3)
12%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (12)
48%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (7)
28%
25 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Happy must win this! WCS EU S3 Premier - Happy is at ~ 1.24 % chances to qualify for Blizzcon 2014 ~ 63.61 % of the time Happy wins this match and their Blizzcon chances go up to ~ 1.95 %. ~ 36.39 % of the time Happy loses this match and their Blizzcon chances go down to ~ 0.01 %. ------------------------------------------------- - MC is at ~ 100 % chances to qualify for Blizzcon 2014 ~ 61.44 % of the time MC wins this match and their Blizzcon chances go up to ~ 100 %. ~ 38.56 % of the time MC loses this match and their Blizzcon chances go down to ~ 100 %. ------------------------------------------------- - Grubby is at ~ 0.01 % chances to qualify for Blizzcon 2014 ~ 37.69 % of the time Grubby wins this match and their Blizzcon chances go up to ~ 0.04 %. ~ 62.31 % of the time Grubby loses this match and their Blizzcon chances go down to ~ 0 %. ------------------------------------------------- - Serral is at ~ 0.02 % chances to qualify for Blizzcon 2014 ~ 37.26 % of the time Serral wins this match and their Blizzcon chances go up to ~ 0.04 %. ~ 62.74 % of the time Serral loses this match and their Blizzcon chances go down to ~ 0 %.
On September 09 2014 22:33 sc2isnotdying wrote: WCS predictor, Happy does not have a better chance at winning his match than MC. Methinks your algorithm might need tweaking.
MC loses a lot to people he seems way better than, he can also beat people who seem way better than him though. That's MC .
On September 09 2014 22:33 sc2isnotdying wrote: WCS predictor, Happy does not have a better chance at winning his match than MC. Methinks your algorithm might need tweaking.
Aligulac says the same cause that's where WCS Predictor gets the player ratings from. Happy has a higher chance to get 2nd, MC has a slightly higher chance to get 1st, Happy has the better chance overall. It's because MC has a VERY weak vsP.
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
On September 09 2014 22:33 sc2isnotdying wrote: WCS predictor, Happy does not have a better chance at winning his match than MC. Methinks your algorithm might need tweaking.
Aligulac says the same cause that's where WCS Predictor gets the player ratings from. Happy has a higher chance to get 2nd, MC has a slightly higher chance to get 1st, Happy has the better chance overall. It's because MC has a VERY weak vsP.
MC's biggest problem isn't against a particular race, its that he is easy to predict. Sure he comes out with a fucking cool build, and smashes faces left and right. Later though great players like Flash start to read his game.
He is a great player, but his biggest problem is that sometimes he never has a plan B. This is probably because his macro game is a bit weaker, thus he compensates it with great micro and tricky builds.
His forcefield usage is nearly perfect.
I think Happy has a chance of beating MC, but Happy has to read into MC's build fast. He has to research MC's games.
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Why should someone who wins Dreamhack in September get more points than someone who wins one in April? They're both theoretically as difficult as one another and it makes more sense to have tournaments in the same circuit give out the same points.
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Why should someone who wins Dreamhack in September get more points than someone who wins one in April? They're both theoretically as difficult as one another and it makes more sense to have tournaments in the same circuit give out the same points.
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
That's terrible. Blizzcon is the end of year tournament. Not the who has won the most last month tournament. That's like if they would give double points in the last race in Formula 1. Oh wait -_-
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Innovation wasn't the only one to qualify early. Qualifying early to Blizzcon just means you won enough tournaments in the top 4, and those that won the first WCS/GSL. Winning either first or second WCS/GSL is nearly guaranteed entry.
Your system would be difficult to balance. You can't predict what would happen by adjusting WCS points according to date played. Is 2% too much? Even 1% might be a bit too much.
And what about players that are dominating the tournaments? Would this adjustment just make them further ahead? Could there be a chance that six progamers consistently make it to Blizzcon year after year?
What you suggest would be complex to predict, and cannot be implemented.
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Innovation wasn't the only one to qualify early. Qualifying early to Blizzcon just means you won enough tournaments in the top 4, and those that won the first WCS/GSL. Winning either first or second WCS/GSL is nearly guaranteed entry.
Your system would be difficult to balance. You can't predict what would happen by adjusting WCS points according to date played. Is 2% too much? Even 1% might be a bit too much.
And what about players that are dominating the tournaments? Would this adjustment just make them further ahead? Could there be a chance that six progamers consistently make it to Blizzcon year after year?
What you suggest would be complex to predict, and cannot be implemented.
While we're on the subject, why can Baltimore secure a playoff berth within a week? There are still 20 games to go in the season! They should make September games count as single-game doubleheaders, so teams don't get to be safe too early on.
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Innovation wasn't the only one to qualify early. Qualifying early to Blizzcon just means you won enough tournaments in the top 4, and those that won the first WCS/GSL. Winning either first or second WCS/GSL is nearly guaranteed entry.
Your system would be difficult to balance. You can't predict what would happen by adjusting WCS points according to date played. Is 2% too much? Even 1% might be a bit too much.
And what about players that are dominating the tournaments? Would this adjustment just make them further ahead? Could there be a chance that six progamers consistently make it to Blizzcon year after year?
What you suggest would be complex to predict, and cannot be implemented.
well I mean you could predict it....
Interesting…..
Could you do it? How long would it take to adjust the algorithm? edit: *throws a rock onto the tracks*
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Innovation wasn't the only one to qualify early. Qualifying early to Blizzcon just means you won enough tournaments in the top 4, and those that won the first WCS/GSL. Winning either first or second WCS/GSL is nearly guaranteed entry.
Your system would be difficult to balance. You can't predict what would happen by adjusting WCS points according to date played. Is 2% too much? Even 1% might be a bit too much.
And what about players that are dominating the tournaments? Would this adjustment just make them further ahead? Could there be a chance that six progamers consistently make it to Blizzcon year after year?
What you suggest would be complex to predict, and cannot be implemented.
well I mean you could predict it....
Die4Ever (Can be predict it? ), Die4Ever (Damn right be can!)
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Innovation wasn't the only one to qualify early. Qualifying early to Blizzcon just means you won enough tournaments in the top 4, and those that won the first WCS/GSL. Winning either first or second WCS/GSL is nearly guaranteed entry.
Your system would be difficult to balance. You can't predict what would happen by adjusting WCS points according to date played. Is 2% too much? Even 1% might be a bit too much.
And what about players that are dominating the tournaments? Would this adjustment just make them further ahead? Could there be a chance that six progamers consistently make it to Blizzcon year after year?
What you suggest would be complex to predict, and cannot be implemented.
well I mean you could predict it....
Die4Ever (Can be predict it? ), Die4Ever (Damn right be can!)
On September 09 2014 23:57 Darkhorse wrote: Best banner of all time. I like MC, but gogo foreigners just because MC already has Blizzcon and we see him all the time :D
Big Issue with this WCS point system, like last year. Innovation had 4100 points after Season1 and was already qualified for Blizzcon ~6months before Blizzcon (~5th place if you look the final table of 2013) . I prefer a wcs points system that increases every month by 2%. you won a tournament at april = 750points, you won it at may = 765 points (2nd place 500 -> 510) etc.
Innovation wasn't the only one to qualify early. Qualifying early to Blizzcon just means you won enough tournaments in the top 4, and those that won the first WCS/GSL. Winning either first or second WCS/GSL is nearly guaranteed entry.
Your system would be difficult to balance. You can't predict what would happen by adjusting WCS points according to date played. Is 2% too much? Even 1% might be a bit too much.
And what about players that are dominating the tournaments? Would this adjustment just make them further ahead? Could there be a chance that six progamers consistently make it to Blizzcon year after year?
What you suggest would be complex to predict, and cannot be implemented.
well I mean you could predict it....
Interesting…..
Could you do it? How long would it take to adjust the algorithm? edit: *throws a rock onto the tracks*
I haven't seen Happy's TvP recently, but MC looked really strong PvT vs Flash so feel good about his chances here :C EDIT: Lol somehow read bracket as MC vs Happy for game 1.
On September 10 2014 01:10 Liquid`Jinro wrote: I haven't seen Happy's TvP recently, but MC looked really strong PvT vs Flash so feel good about his chances here :C
Theoretically he's the second best play in the group but he hasn't looked great in his other WCS Premier groups.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
19%
★★★- Good game (8)
50%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
13%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
13%
16 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (6)
35%
★★★- Good game (6)
35%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
6%
17 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
17%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
33%
★★★- Good game (2)
17%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
8%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
25%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend MC vs Serral Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
I cannot imagine how frustrating it must be to play against MC You kind of have to prepare for a lot of crazy stuff that he might throw at you. Then again, if you prepare for all that stuff he just kills you with a sharp timing because you wasted to many ressources
I feel like MC is much better with the blink stalker style or Stargate than with the Soul Train. I've noticed that a lot of his losses in PvZ come from failed sentry immortal all ins. This one worked out okay, but it could have gone very badly after the prism was sniped.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (11)
50%
★★★- Good game (3)
14%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
9%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
9%
22 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (11)
50%
★★★- Good game (3)
14%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
9%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
9%
22 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On September 10 2014 02:04 BlackCompany wrote: I dont know if Grubby just thinks this gets him some easy wins or if he feels he wont win in a later game
It seems like a good way to play against someone who chooses to play in the dark by not using Reaper FE.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (8)
42%
★★★- Good game (4)
21%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
5%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (8)
42%
★★★- Good game (4)
21%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
5%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (8)
42%
★★★- Good game (4)
21%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
5%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Who gave that 3 stars?! 2 is questionable.
I did +★ - all in got rekt +★ - protoss got rekt +★ - Dutchie got rekt
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (8)
42%
★★★- Good game (4)
21%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
5%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (8)
42%
★★★- Good game (4)
21%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
5%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Who gave that 3 stars?! 2 is questionable.
I did +★ - all in got rekt +★ - protoss got rekt +★ - Dutchie got rekt
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (8)
42%
★★★- Good game (4)
21%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
5%
19 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Who gave that 3 stars?! 2 is questionable.
I did +★ - all in got rekt +★ - protoss got rekt +★ - Dutchie got rekt
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
44%
★★★- Good game (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
11%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Grubby vs Happy Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On September 10 2014 02:21 Incognoto wrote: To think this is Ro32, meaning that these are supposed to be one of the 32 best European players.
These games are incredibly lackluster.
BETTER MAKE A JUDGEMENT ABOUT THE ENTIRE WCS EU BASED ON THIS SERIES
Grubby and Happy are two established European names though, they've been around for a while. You'd think they might show something better than this. It's not as if one of 'em had a bad day or something; they're both showing mediocre play.
On September 10 2014 02:21 Incognoto wrote: To think this is Ro32, meaning that these are supposed to be one of the 32 best European players.
These games are incredibly lackluster.
BETTER MAKE A JUDGEMENT ABOUT THE ENTIRE WCS EU BASED ON THIS SERIES
Grubby and Happy are two established European names though, they've been around for a while. You'd think they might show something better than this. It's not as if one of 'em had a bad day or something; they're both showing mediocre play.
There were multiple GSL Ro32 games which were equally 'bad'. It means nothing
On September 10 2014 02:21 Incognoto wrote: To think this is Ro32, meaning that these are supposed to be one of the 32 best European players.
These games are incredibly lackluster.
BETTER MAKE A JUDGEMENT ABOUT THE ENTIRE WCS EU BASED ON THIS SERIES
Grubby and Happy are two established European names though, they've been around for a while. You'd think they might show something better than this. It's not as if one of 'em had a bad day or something; they're both showing mediocre play.
There were multiple GSL Ro32 games which were equally 'bad'. It means nothing
I watched most of the GSL Code S matches from this season and the last one. Sometimes a player makes a mistake and straight up loses. This isn't what happened here at all. This was not a bop.
These matches are much worse than anything you see in Code S and probably Code A as well.
E: well that series anyway. I'm going to see if the next series is better
On September 10 2014 02:21 Incognoto wrote: To think this is Ro32, meaning that these are supposed to be one of the 32 best European players.
These games are incredibly lackluster.
BETTER MAKE A JUDGEMENT ABOUT THE ENTIRE WCS EU BASED ON THIS SERIES
Grubby and Happy are two established European names though, they've been around for a while. You'd think they might show something better than this. It's not as if one of 'em had a bad day or something; they're both showing mediocre play.
It's the way Grubby is approaching it though. He knows Happy is super defensive and lategame oriented, so he goes for very aggressive all in builds, which play out like that. Simple.
On September 10 2014 02:21 Incognoto wrote: To think this is Ro32, meaning that these are supposed to be one of the 32 best European players.
These games are incredibly lackluster.
BETTER MAKE A JUDGEMENT ABOUT THE ENTIRE WCS EU BASED ON THIS SERIES
Grubby and Happy are two established European names though, they've been around for a while. You'd think they might show something better than this. It's not as if one of 'em had a bad day or something; they're both showing mediocre play.
There were multiple GSL Ro32 games which were equally 'bad'. It means nothing
It was just Grubby's approach to the series, it was smart. Only thing that went wrong was his g2 he thought Happy would open as he did in g3. They are both very good players, everyone should know.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
25%
★★★- Good game (7)
58%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
17%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
22%
★★★- Good game (4)
44%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
11%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Losers Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (5)
71%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
14%
★★★- Good game (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
14%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
That pylon spot is so bs. Been playing random on NA server recently (fun builds with z/t, learning p) and I got owned twice in a row by Tails, abusing that spot both games.
First time, I just couldn't figure out how his zealots got into my natural. Saw it during the second game, but it was too late already
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (5)
63%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (3)
38%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
8%
★★★- Good game (7)
54%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
15%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
15%
13 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
Poll: Recommend Winners Match Game 3?
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
20%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
40%
★★★- Good game (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
20%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
20%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
meh always biggest problem by grubby, always busy with building structures etc and thats why he never look whats up with his army if opponents army is (suddenly) there. This happens to me too if I play T or P. Impossible with Zerg because creep helps/warns me ^^
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
30%
★★★- Good game (3)
30%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
10%
10 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On September 10 2014 04:02 DJHelium wrote: I think it's quite smart by Grubby to go for these 1 base builds. He's abusing the lack of scouting from Happy.
Happy not only sent out multiple scvs to scout Grubby's base, but also scouted around Happy's own base to look for proxies, and even preemptively lifted his natural up to defend better.
On September 10 2014 04:02 DJHelium wrote: I think it's quite smart by Grubby to go for these 1 base builds. He's abusing the lack of scouting from Happy.
Happy not only sent out multiple scvs to scout Grubby's base, but also scouted around Happy's own base to look for proxies, and even preemptively lifted his natural up to defend better.
Well, yeah, after he spotted the Gateways in the corner of the main, the lack of in-base tech and the lack of an expo, of course he scouted for proxies.
On September 10 2014 04:02 DJHelium wrote: I think it's quite smart by Grubby to go for these 1 base builds. He's abusing the lack of scouting from Happy.
Happy not only sent out multiple scvs to scout Grubby's base, but also scouted around Happy's own base to look for proxies, and even preemptively lifted his natural up to defend better.
Ok, lack of reaper opening is what I meant. A lot harder to scout without it.
Happy is doing a great job at scouting. But it's not possible to know what the protoss has proxied, so you have to make an educated guess if it's blink, DTs, void rays or immortals.
On September 10 2014 04:02 DJHelium wrote: I think it's quite smart by Grubby to go for these 1 base builds. He's abusing the lack of scouting from Happy.
Happy not only sent out multiple scvs to scout Grubby's base, but also scouted around Happy's own base to look for proxies, and even preemptively lifted his natural up to defend better.
Well, yeah, after he spotted the Gateways in the corner of the main, the lack of in-base tech and the lack of an expo, of course he scouted for proxies.
On September 10 2014 04:02 DJHelium wrote: I think it's quite smart by Grubby to go for these 1 base builds. He's abusing the lack of scouting from Happy.
Happy not only sent out multiple scvs to scout Grubby's base, but also scouted around Happy's own base to look for proxies, and even preemptively lifted his natural up to defend better.
Ok, lack of reaper opening is what I meant. A lot harder to scout without it.
Happy is doing a great job at scouting. But it's not possible to know what the protoss has proxied, so you have to make an educated guess if it's blink, DTs, void rays or immortals.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
33%
★★★- Good game (3)
25%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
8%
12 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On September 10 2014 04:10 Deathstar wrote: hmm didn't except this wp happy
and by happy I mean grubby
Sick edit bro, bet Kaelaris would love if they casted the games with a 3 hour delay instead of a 3 min and he'd gladly edit the games to call everything correctly.
On September 10 2014 04:10 Deathstar wrote: hmm didn't except this wp happy
and by happy I mean grubby
Sick edit bro, bet Kaelaris would love if they casted the games with a 3 hour delay instead of a 3 min and he'd gladly edit the games to call everything correctly.
Are you trying to say something to me? I legit thought Happy was going to win
On September 10 2014 04:35 DeathSquire36 wrote: Is Grubby still missing thermal lance? What is going on here?
I think so but I don't have the volume on so I can't hear the sweet voice of Apollo/Kaelaris telling me whether or not this is true
Same, I have to keep it muted here. But he is definitely missing it still. His colossi are getting trashed in every engagement, this is a huge blunder. C'mon Grubby, I wanted you to win...
Nuke harass is pretty cool (and embarrassing to Grubby) but I wish Happy would send a few bio units to the top right and mid left bases, because Grubby isn't moving out at all lol.
On September 10 2014 04:44 Darkhorse wrote: Grubby realize you don't have range dammit. You must have noticed when you tried to come down your ramp and they couldn't fight
I played a TvZ where i had no combat shield for 30mins
On September 10 2014 04:44 Darkhorse wrote: Grubby realize you don't have range dammit. You must have noticed when you tried to come down your ramp and they couldn't fight
I played a TvZ where i had no combat shield for 30mins
On September 10 2014 04:44 Darkhorse wrote: Grubby realize you don't have range dammit. You must have noticed when you tried to come down your ramp and they couldn't fight
I played a TvZ where i had no combat shield for 30mins
Well that's a little tougher to realize. I expect my marines to get annihilated by banelings regardless
On September 10 2014 04:44 Darkhorse wrote: Grubby realize you don't have range dammit. You must have noticed when you tried to come down your ramp and they couldn't fight
I played a TvZ where i had no combat shield for 30mins
Well that's a little tougher to realize. I expect my marines to get annihilated by banelings regardless
I don't know... I was taking good fight, with equal upgrade and i was not understanding why i was losing those fights... Should be easy to realize but sometime you're too focused to see obvious things!
On September 10 2014 04:49 Fanatic-Templar wrote: Wait, does Grubby actually not have Extended Thermal Lances? He's going to feel like a Genius when he realises.
44 minutes in and he's still building range-less colossi. He's not going to realize until after the game. What a shame.
On September 10 2014 04:51 Boucot wrote: I don't see nuke games very often, especially in TvP but this game is way way better than the one vs ToD at DH Winter 2011.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
8%
★★★- Good game (3)
12%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (12)
48%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (7)
28%
25 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On September 10 2014 04:49 Fanatic-Templar wrote: Wait, does Grubby actually not have Extended Thermal Lances? He's going to feel like a Genius when he realises.
44 minutes in and he's still building range-less colossi. He's not going to realize until after the game. What a shame.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
8%
★★★- Good game (3)
12%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (12)
48%
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (7)
28%
25 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
On September 10 2014 04:49 Fanatic-Templar wrote: Wait, does Grubby actually not have Extended Thermal Lances? He's going to feel like a Genius when he realises.
44 minutes in and he's still building range-less colossi. He's not going to realize until after the game. What a shame.
Honeslty you have to understand how devastated Grubby must feel. He obviously prepared those matches pretty well and would have made a good ro8 contender. So sad.
EPT
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/8qsgg4G.png)
![[image loading]](http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/images2/thumb/3/30/Writers_Icon.png/15px-Writers_Icon.png){kind=icon}
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/r9ZH0.png)
WCS EU
WCS_DE | 
WCS_FR | 
WCS_PL | 
WCS_ES | 
WCS_RU | 
WCS_IT | 
WCS_PT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/6wl40.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/640.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/4567.jpg)
MC vs 
Serral ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/2159.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/2889.jpg)
Happy ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/bv8Kw.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/3wcCS.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/WdLE8.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/oo393En.jpg)
Serral in G1. 
ty for translation
![[image loading]](http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070402110246/uncyclopedia/images/b/bc/Santa_drunk.gif)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ak93CxN.jpg)
![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BxHd7jUIEAAnhAj.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/b77KeJX.png)
