[SPL] Postseason Semis - SKT vs CJ Day 3

[SPL] Postseason Semis - SKT vs CJ Day 3 - Page 27

Post a Reply

Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 45 Next All

Calt

Finland1140 Posts

July 22 2014 11:24 GMT

#521

Soulkey multitasking a lot better qq

Thrillz

4313 Posts

July 22 2014 11:24 GMT

#522

Nice splitting by SK and not so much by Effort.

robson1

3632 Posts

July 22 2014 11:24 GMT

#523

On July 22 2014 20:22 Zealously wrote:
I'm liking Effort's position more and more I think

Effort is winning. ...

or his bank carrying him?

Heartland

Sweden24584 Posts

July 22 2014 11:25 GMT

#524

On July 22 2014 20:23 Tsubbi wrote:
we cant nerf the mothership core because of pvp but zvz is in this pathetic state for all of hots, first muta, now this...

but it's fun now! Shame it has to be until 200 supply that Roach becomes fun

Undead1993

Germany17651 Posts

July 22 2014 11:25 GMT

#525

soulkey wasted waay too much imo. effort wins

Yoshi Kirishima

United States10357 Posts

July 22 2014 11:26 GMT

#526

On July 22 2014 20:21 robson1 wrote:

Show nested quote +

On July 22 2014 20:20 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:

On July 22 2014 20:17 TheDwf wrote:

On July 22 2014 20:11 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:

On July 22 2014 19:48 TheDwf wrote:

On July 22 2014 19:44 Exarl25 wrote:

On July 22 2014 19:44 TheDwf wrote:

On July 22 2014 19:41 Exarl25 wrote:
It is viable. There is absolutely no chance in hell he would do the same thing 3 times on this map in such important games if it didn't have merit. Standard play fails too if your build isn't tight enough and you are slow on your transitions. If he got that AA up faster the game goes on.

If he gets that AA up he still loses to the addition of Templars. Air/Templars wins everything in lategame TvP.

Going to trust in the judgement of a team in the playoffs of Proleague over yours.

Sure, the 0-2 record against answers that were not hilariously off speaks for itself.

This is as silly as saying that a bio player losing 0-2 proves that bio isn't viable, just because his composition wasn't hilariously off. You were tricked and have 2 vikings too few to defend his colossi. You didn't scout ahead enough and ran into some storms. Etc. etc.

In a pro game you can lose if anything is slightly off. That's common sense. You should know this.

I also choose to trust a professional gamer who was comfortable enough to let the game go that long and do it 3 times and surely has a much better understanding of the game than you to say it's not viable.

Believe if you want to believe. The day the mech:bio ratio isn't 500:1 anymore in high level Korean TvP, the conversations about the viability of mech can start. Until that's it's pure faith from people who want to believe vs the trial of reality.

Well when such an occurrence as the sudden burst of mech in TvT in MLG Anaheim (after people consider it not to be viable simply because it isn't played much) has happened, I can believe in anything. Or in 2012 with mech finally being used in TvZ after being absent in GSL since virtually 2010. To me the amount of times a style is used isn't directly connected to how viable it is.

So 4 years of pros randomly throwing it in and getting punished for it don't convince you.... alrighty then. Keep believing.

Getting punished for what? Air/HT in HotS? For 4 years?

If you're talking about WoL, Terran won in TvP with mech more often than lost. I found every single game in GSL and wrote the score down. The point is not popularity or if it's better than bio or not. If it can win, then that's what I consider to be viable. Again, that's like the people saying back in TvT and TvZ that mech isn't viable, because it's used so infrequently. There's such a thing as players not figuring something out until later.

Also if you're going to say players randomly threw it in and lost with it, then why are you judging a style's viability based on those?