EPTOn June 18 2013 21:09 thepuppyassassin wrote:
Which final fantasy was she in again?
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/KqNFVv6.png)
Which final fantasy was she in again?
euhhmm my final fanatasy?
[OSL] Ro32 Groups A&B 2013 WCS KR Season 2 - Page 86
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
freerolll
Belgium1056 Posts
euhhmm my final fanatasy? | ||
|
zyzq
United States3123 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:09 Pandemona wrote: Oh my that HERPDEDERP moment  So all together there is 24,000 ish, give or take a couple 100 watching via VLC and a few watching 2 streams etc. I'm watching on TV, don't forget the korean viewers | ||
|
Highwinds
Canada954 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:09 Waxangel wrote: ehhhh just wait until Rain gets eliminated from the Ro32, you'll all hate Bo1 :D yeah i remember when he got elimianted in Ro32 last time.... We obv need Bo5 for next season's GSL ro32  | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:09 Waxangel wrote: ehhhh just wait until Rain gets eliminated from the Ro32, you'll all hate Bo1 :D Nah more reason to like Bo1 if that happens. | ||
|
BadBinky
Finland649 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:08 Oddball28 wrote: I agree the game is good. I don't deny that fact at all. In fact is was one of the most i've seen in a while. However i'm just annoyed with people talking about the best of one system like there isn't flaws. Just like MVP and other players shines in best of fives or sevens, the possibility of having those players go out in a best of one system against an inferior player in a longer series, is a loss for me. It's kinda like having Sjow beat Life in a bo3 just for him to loss painfully in the next game. Although not fully compareable. Also dont think that i dont appreciate upsets, it gives a tournament life. But all in all i prefer the bo3 far more than the bo1. Each to his own i supose. DH is staged OSL is bo1 | ||
|
fuzzylogic44
Canada2633 Posts
| ||
|
Laryleprakon
New Zealand9496 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:09 Pandemona wrote: Oh my that HERPDEDERP moment So all together there is 24,000 ish, give or take a couple 100 watching via VLC and a few watching 2 streams etc. + Korean TV/Internet streams. | ||
|
xuanzue
Colombia1747 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:09 Waxangel wrote: ehhhh just wait until Rain gets eliminated from the Ro32, you'll all hate Bo1 :D rain and life are the new drg | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:08 Oddball28 wrote: I agree the game is good. I don't deny that fact at all. In fact is was one of the most i've seen in a while. However i'm just annoyed with people talking about the best of one system like there isn't flaws. Just like MVP and other players shines in best of fives or sevens, the possibility of having those players go out in a best of one system against an inferior player in a longer series, is a loss for me. It's kinda like having Sjow beat Life in a bo3 just for him to loss painfully in the next game. Although not fully compareable. Also dont think that i dont appreciate upsets, it gives a tournament life. But all in all i prefer the bo3 far more than the bo1. Each to his own i supose. you compare very different things and what some people forget is that these players know perfectly what they're doing. They're not going into the matches with the mindset "oh fuck I have such a huge chance to lose", but rather the whole training environement of the player is preparing the game to come for hours so it must be a success. It makes the game so much more different. | ||
Waxangel
United States33093 Posts
just say it's 750,000 ppl watching it without any verification, like any LoL or Dota2 quote of "chinese viewers" | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12022 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:06 DrPandaPhD wrote: I dislike widow mines design. Balanced or not. The "chance to be amazing but can also be useless" design is bothering me :/ Pretty much every unit is like that though, especially banelings | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:06 Ammanas wrote: ..and this is why you do Bo1 (I would stop with this nonsense, but there is too much people still thinking it's somehow inferior as far as 'fun to watch' is concerned -.-) Giving most of the credit for the quality of the games to the bo1 like some people are doing is a fallacy in itself. Or you could just wait until we have a day with poor games or favored players gets knocked out and see what people say then. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
 | ||
imallinson
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:08 Oddball28 wrote: I agree the game is good. I don't deny that fact at all. In fact is was one of the most i've seen in a while. However i'm just annoyed with people talking about the best of one system like there isn't flaws. Just like MVP and other players shines in best of fives or sevens, the possibility of having those players go out in a best of one system against an inferior player in a longer series, is a loss for me. It's kinda like having Sjow beat Life in a bo3 just for him to loss painfully in the next game. Although not fully compareable. Also dont think that i dont appreciate upsets, it gives a tournament life. But all in all i prefer the bo3 far more than the bo1. Each to his own i supose. It also takes away Life  | ||
|
Oddball28
Denmark2121 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:11 Boonbag wrote: you compare very different things and what some people forget is that these players know perfectly what they're doing. They're not going into the matches with the mindset "oh fuck I have such a huge chance to lose", but rather the whole training environement of the player is preparing the game to come for hours so it must be a success. It makes the game so much more different. Very different things? You have to compare them if you want make some sort of assesment of which format you like or dislike or which you find worse or better. How else do you want to make a comparison? Jesus. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49498 Posts
On June 18 2013 20:22 T.O.P. wrote: Noob. People used to watch the korean stream and the korean ads. people still do. | ||
|
Lunareste
United States3596 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:06 Ammanas wrote: ..and this is why you do Bo1 (I would stop with this nonsense, but there is too much people still thinking it's somehow inferior as far as 'fun to watch' is concerned -.-) I said it already in the thread, but I prefer bo3 because there's less possibility for flukes in the long run, but bo1 is better for intensity because losing a map has humongous implications. | ||
|
Kommander
Philippines4950 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:11 Qikz wrote: Pretty much every unit is like that though, especially banelings Way better design philosophy than free units, that's for sure | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On June 18 2013 21:10 fuzzylogic44 wrote: bo1 sure makes things more captivating Agreed, more games doesn't always equal more entertainment. I tend to drift off with mass Bo3's, we could've potentially had 9 ZvZ's earlier | ||
| ||
