data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
[WCS EU] RO16 Group C Premier Season 1 2013 - Page 43
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Clefairy
1570 Posts
![]() | ||
SCST
Mexico1609 Posts
| ||
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
WCS EU including analytic MC = best WCS. | ||
Sent.
Poland9097 Posts
| ||
nvs.
Canada3609 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:45 TheBB wrote: Thought experiment time. Alice is a lot better than Bob, and will beat him every time offline, but only 60% of the time online, due to whatever reasons. You don't know this, but you have them play 10000 online games and Alice wins 6000 of them. Who is better? Your claim is that you can't know, since this is flawed information, but actually it shows that Alice is clearly the stronger player. The problem is your theoretical cutoff seems to be 10,000 games to derive a 60% winrate for Alice. Around here, people see a top Korean lose one game cross-server to an inferior foreigner and then lose their minds about how they've "lost their touch" or that foreigners are "closing the gap." You can definitely lay some groundwork with a players relative skill using online play, but I would never use it for any sort of ranking system. | ||
figq
12519 Posts
| ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:49 une_certaine_verve wrote: Social media segment is atrocious. Literally nothing is being said. Total waste of time (and money if they do pay the guy for just that) ... and a perfect example why people should use them LESS. | ||
SCST
Mexico1609 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:52 m4inbrain wrote: I just wanna say btw, i love having so many brits over here casting. Their english is just so much more "eloquent" and "snobbish", i just love it. WCS EU including analytic MC = best WCS. Snobbish LOL, that's like a compliment sandwich. Compliment + douchebaggery + compliment = Sandwich. . | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:49 Yaotzin wrote: Flawed information remains flawed even if it happens to be correct in one instance. Broken clock and all that. The online results tell you nothing; Alice could be far better but suffering from lag, or Bob could be better but suffering from lag. It's impossible to know until they play offline. I'm still pretty sure you mean "little" and not "nothing". If I were to play a million online games against Life and win all of them it would be outrageous to claim that this tells you nothing about Life's abilities. | ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
Flamehaze
Poland67 Posts
This. | ||
Dundron2000
Sweden1140 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:52 Clefairy wrote: Social media guy's job sucks ![]() yea.. shit. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
Penev
28440 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:52 Clefairy wrote: Social media guy's job sucks ![]() Haha. Some people here are far too serious unfortunately.. | ||
SCST
Mexico1609 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:52 Sent. wrote: I'm actually starting to like the social media segment. Yeah, sometimes it's a bit weird but certainly it doesn't deserve the hate I see here. I agree, think its just that some people strongly dislike it, while most of us don't mind and it probably is actually doing what they want . . . that is, increasing the social media buzz about the show lol. | ||
Vertitto
Poland750 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:52 pepe08 wrote: not everyone whatching wcs knows TL. but i am sure ereryone belives 40k people are here...NOT yea but but saying the same thing every day "what's going up in social media?" "well, there's smth going on on TL and reddit and twitter". he could as well answered "some forum stuff...you know....". They should not be showing the social media thing if nothing special appeared on them | ||
Clazziquai10
Singapore1949 Posts
| ||
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:53 SCST wrote: Snobbish LOL, that's like a compliment sandwich. Compliment + douchebaggery + compliment = Sandwich. . I didn't mean it douchebaggy though. I always see Redeye with a black tailcoat and a monocle, he even has the posture for that (with one hand on the back) and stuff. I really like that. ^^ | ||
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
On May 17 2013 02:53 TheBB wrote: I'm still pretty sure you mean "little" and not "nothing". If I were to play a million online games against Life and win all of them it would be outrageous to claim that this tells you nothing about Life's abilities. It tells you about his abilities in a specific context - playing you online. Granted I'm being hyperbolic, you can say a build is bad online for example - latency doesn't affect such a thing. But for anywhere latency is involved, you simply don't know if a player is playing anything like they would offline. | ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
| ||