EPT[WCS EU] Premier Division Qualifiers - Page 60
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
| ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:07 Shellshock1122 wrote: Pretty sick from Xigua to make it this far playing from China. Hope he can make it. Would like to see the Chinese scene do something Yeah it would be nice if a chinese player qualify but not today please. | ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
| ||
|
Aeromi
France14462 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:11 Boucot wrote: Yeah it would be nice if a chinese player qualify but not today please. Yeah please. ^_^ | ||
|
DeathProfessor
United States1052 Posts
However I think I would rather see Beasty get a spot. | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:12 DeathProfessor wrote: To me Chinese scene just as foreign as any other foreigner so I root for China anyway! However I think I would rather see Beasty get a spot. They're not in each other's way. | ||
|
Fubb
Germany160 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:12 DeathProfessor wrote: To me Chinese scene just as foreign as any other foreigner so I root for China anyway! However I think I would rather see Beasty get a spot. Well Beasty and XiGua aren't competing for a spot today, since they are on different sides of the bracket | ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:09 grs wrote: It looks like there is price money like on a regular Go4SC2, so I guess they play it out. Usually having a tournament without any losers bracket is fine because you just go with If A > B & B > C then A > C... However since the top TWO advance you can't say that because A > B and C > D that A > D or C > B. A better way of ensuring the "best two" advance would be a losers bracket in ro4 (essentially GSL style group play for the last 4 players). | ||
|
DeathProfessor
United States1052 Posts
Beastyqt Starnan 1-1 | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
Keidy
253 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:15 AlternativeEgo wrote: Beasty 1-1 Starnan what stream? | ||
|
[17]Purple
United Kingdom3489 Posts
| ||
|
grs
Germany2339 Posts
On April 15 2013 04:14 DusTerr wrote: Usually having a tournament without any losers bracket is fine because you just go with If A > B & B > C then A > C... However since the top TWO advance you can't say that because A > B and C > D that A > D or C > B. A better way of ensuring the "best two" advance would be a losers bracket in ro4 (essentially GSL style group play for the last 4 players). What does your answer have to do with my post you are quoting? | ||
|
DOUDOU
Wales2940 Posts
| ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
Russian http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/EmpireTVorg.ZERG | ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
|
Deckkie
Netherlands1595 Posts
| ||
|
DeathProfessor
United States1052 Posts
| ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
| ||
| ||
